FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Personal Injury Attorney in Davis

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with personal injury matters that demand topnotch legal representation, Carlson Bier is the go-to law firm. Fast gaining a sterling reputation in Davis for our exceptional service, we understand how crucial it is to have passionate advocates fighting on behalf of injury victims. Our attorneys bring together decades long experience and commitment; focusing exclusively on personal injury cases which include car accidents, workplace injuries or slip-and-fall cases. We rigorously fight to protect your rights while ensuring you receive the maximum compensation deserved from insurance companies who often try to underpay rightful claims. Carlston Bier takes pride in successfully handling hundreds of personal injury cases throughout Illinois; combined with this impressive track record are countless testimonials from satisfied clients over the years bearing witness to our unmatched expertise and professionalism. Thusly, when safety meets compromise, turn not to second bests but make Carlson Bier your trusted ally amidst such adversities – where client care rules paramount above all!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Personal Injury Lawyers in Davis Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury law – a branch of the legal field dedicated to assisting individuals who have suffered physical or emotional harm due to the negligence or intentional actions of others. At our firm, based in Illinois, our experienced team of attorneys strike a springboard for those impacted by such incidences so they can leap forward towards recovery and adequate compensation.

We understand that you may be feeling overwhelmed right now; perhaps you’ve just been involved in an unfortunate incident and are unsure about your rights, liabilities, or potential avenues for redress. However, it’s essential to realize that personal injuries aren’t restricted to physical harm. They embody a broad spectrum that includes psychological duress induced directly or indirectly through various channels like defective products, accidents at work places, traffic accidents and medical malpractice amongst others.

• Defective Products: This involves cases where an individual has sustained some form of injury from using a product that turned out defective as designed or manufactured.

• Work-related Incidents: Accidents may occur at workplaces leading to significant impairment or even death.

• Traffic Accidents: These typically encompass instances where one is injured due to another party’s oversight on the roads.

• Medical Malpractice: Misdiagnosis or wrong treatment approach could lead to decimating consequences ranging from direct physical trauma to mental distress.

There often tends to be confusion regarding whom should bear responsibility in these circumstances? Can you claim damages? How much should you expect? What is the duration within which lawsuits should be filed? We tirelessly strive at Carlson Bier to ensure we furnish lucid answers and solutions tailored according to each distinctive circumstance surrounding any personal injury debacle.

The task might seem daunting when navigating this minefield alone—as exacting laws govern every step along the tortuous path paved with litigation jargon often inaccessible even for educated minds not versed in legalese! It becomes crucial then not only entrusting full faith but aligning with an accomplished wingman, who could guide and guard all the way. Take heart in knowing that our team provides exemplary service to ensure your rights are protected against any infringements as a result of lax wrongdoing or negligence.

Consider Carlson Bier like a bulwark for fair compensation and just recovery in personal injury cases. We take the burden off your shoulders with indispensable support right from initiating legal proceedings to successful closure rendering top-notch representation throughout. To us, it’s more than winning—we endeavor towards comprehensive claim management, reputation restoration, damages calculation, but most importantly ensuring comfort levels enabling individuals back on track without having to worry about mounting bills and undetermined waiting periods.

Justifiably you may ask: why should I trust Carlson Bier? Here’s why:

• Knowledge & Expertise: Our attorneys have extensive experience handling various types of personal injury related cases.

• Stellar Reputation: We pride ourselves on earning a strong reputation based on consistent results achieved for our clients.

• Focus On Clients: In every case we commit the necessary resources and expertise required offering unwavering focus translated into winning strategies!

Impacted due to personal injury attributable to someone else’s neglect or intentional misconduct? It can be an excruciatingly painful time – emotionally more so than physically. Comprehending slew of complex rules encapsulating Illinois’s liability or insurance claims regulations or even Dragooning through court procedures seem next-to-impossible while convalescing through such tumultuous period alone; hence rely on proven performers—Trust Carlson Bier! Our experienced corps of personal injury lawyers will not only direct you towards securing deserved damages but also help untangle entwined intricacies associated within the ambit of how Illinois laws might influence your case.

Take the first step with us at Carlson Bier toward understanding your rights as well as prospective resolution vis-a-vis redress for incurred injuries followed by assuring adequate relief correspondingly aligned satisfactorily meeting damages claimed. Desirous to understanding how much your case may be worth? Neatly nestled below is the button guiding you towards putting speculated calculations to rest with definitive value comprehension formulated by our elite team of personal injury lawyers at world renowned Carlson Bier in Illinois!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Davis Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Davis

Areas of Practice in Davis

Cycling Crashes

Dedicated to legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or unsafe conditions.

Fire Burns

Offering specialist legal assistance for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Clinical Malpractice

Providing professional legal advice for patients affected by physician malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Merchandise Obligation

Managing cases involving unsafe products, supplying professional legal guidance to individuals affected by harmful products.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble and Slip Incidents

Skilled in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to victims seeking justice for their injuries.

Childbirth Harms

Extending legal help for kin affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Accidents

Incidents: Committed to helping victims of car accidents receive just remuneration for harms and harm.

Scooter Mishaps

Dedicated to providing representation for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

18-Wheeler Accident

Providing professional legal assistance for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for harms.

Building Mishaps

Engaged in assisting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Traumas

Committed to extending expert legal assistance for persons suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Traumas

Adept at dealing with cases for people who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Jogger Crashes

Committed to legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Unjust Loss

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and expert legal services to ensure justice.

Neural Injury

Focused on defending victims with paralysis, offering expert legal assistance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​