...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Dawson

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When seeking compensation for dog bite injuries in Dawson, turning to Carlson Bier can be the most effective move you can make. With a distinguished reputation throughout Illinois, this team of seasoned personal injury professionals specializes in delivering justice for victims of canine-related incidents. The magnitude and gravity of these cases are deeply understood by our experts at Carlson Bier. We diligently work to prove liability in dog bite cases and strive fearlessly towards attaining maximum reimbursement for all damages incurred. Navigating through the intricate legal processes requires a thorough knowledge base—one that comes only with specialist training as enacted by Team Carlson Bier. Not just armed with prowess on legislation but also imbued with compassion— we understand your pain, aid your recovery while ensuring that justice is serviced timely and aptly. For the residents or visitors invocated in Dog Bite Incidents around Dawson area- remember that when matters get legally grim after a dog attack – Trust no one else but ‘Carlson Bier’. Your home state champions: standing unwavering for your rights!

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Dawson Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are committed to providing unparalleled legal support and advice for victims of personal injuries. A significant part of our practice focuses on representing those who have suffered from dog bite injuries – a deeply traumatizing and often overlooked form of personal injury. Our attorneys, based in Illinois, are well-versed in state legislations surrounding these cases.

Often seen as man’s best friend, dogs can unfortunately cause harm too. Dog bite injuries not only cause physical pain and suffering, but also lead to emotional trauma that may last for years. Many are unaware that under certain circumstances, the law provides protection and compensation for such victims. It is vital to emphasize here:

• The owner’s liability: In most instances in Illinois, the pet owner is held accountable if his or her dog attacks someone.

• Statute of Limitations: Under Illinois law, victims generally have two years from the date of incident to file their case.

• Necessary Documentation: Accurate medical records attributing your injuries to the dog attack can significantly strengthen your claim.

• Legal Assistance: An experienced attorney is essential in obtaining appropriate compensation.

Dog bites often lead to more than just superficial wounds; they can result in severe infections due to transmission of bacteria through saliva. Rabies remains one serious health concern associated with dog bites. Moreover, canine-inflicted injuries might require costly treatments like surgery or skin grafts along with recovery therapies including physiotherapy or counseling.

Our team at Carlson Bier assists victims navigate this complex process by ensuring their rights are protected while negotiating deserved settlements for physical ailments as well as psychological damage caused by such incidents. Our vast experience includes serving clients with claims concerning a variety of breeds and situations which helps us develop effective strategies tailored to each individual case.

Emotional distress cannot be undermined; an unexpected assault by a domestic animal can result in lifelong fear restricting individuals from engaging socially especially around pets. Sufferers might develop acute anxiety disorders post such incidents which might hinder their everyday life drastically. Carlson Bier understands this and advocates for compensation encompassing these mental traumas as well.

The most imperative step post a dog bite injury is receiving appropriate medical attention to ensure timely treatment and accurate documentation of the injuries sustained. Subsequently, seeking legal advice becomes crucial in identifying eligible claims based on pertinent state laws and regulations.

At Carlson Bier, we firmly believe that your focus should be solely on recuperation instead of being burdened by accumulating medical bills or indeterminate negotiations with insurance companies. We strive to bear the load of pursuit while you heal, offering guidance at each step ensuring you understand what’s happening and are satisfied with the progress.

We always aim at obtaining fair settlements covering all incurred costs like medical expenses, lost wages due to absence from work, along with compensating non-economic damage related to discomfort or lasting fear caused by the incident. However, if necessary and in best interest of our clients, we are prepared to aggressively litigate their case in court ensuring justice prevails.

Indeed having a seasoned lawyer can make an enormous difference while dealing with repercussions of a dog bite injury: not only assisting legally but also psychologically throughout this challenging ordeal providing empathy mixed with top-notch legal proficiency – That is the promise at Carlson Bier!

Now that you have been apprised about various aspects surrounding Dog Bite Injuries under Illinois law as handled by Carlson Bier’s proficient team, give yourself the opportunity to rightfully address this unwarranted adversity. Take control today; do not allow fiscal worries exacerbate your emotional distress further. Use our unique tool designed specifically for evaluating prospective cases like yours instantly online: simply click on the button below! Understand how much your case could possibly be worth without leaving comfort zone or getting obliged towards any commitment: knowledge certainly empowers! With Carlson Bier as your ally during these trying times – remember ‘You don’t have to stand alone!’

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Dawson Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Dawson

Areas of Practice in Dawson

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Expert in legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or hazardous conditions.

Burn Injuries

Extending skilled legal services for people of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Medical Negligence

Ensuring dedicated legal services for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Fault

Handling cases involving unsafe products, providing adept legal services to victims affected by defective items.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Trip and Slip Injuries

Specialist in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking recovery for their harm.

Birth Injuries

Extending legal support for households affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Crashes: Devoted to guiding victims of car accidents obtain appropriate remuneration for wounds and impairment.

Scooter Mishaps

Expert in providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

18-Wheeler Accident

Offering specialist legal representation for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for hurts.

Construction Site Collisions

Concentrated on advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Cognitive Damages

Expert in providing expert legal representation for patients suffering from brain injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Injuries

Expertise in tackling cases for persons who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Dedicated to legal support for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Unjust Demise

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and adept legal guidance to ensure justice.

Vertebral Trauma

Expert in representing clients with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal representation to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer