FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Dawson

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a spinal cord injury can be profoundly life-changing, impacting both the victim and their loved ones. If you or a family member has experienced this trauma in Dawson, Carlson Bier’s highly skilled legal representation is paramount to securing rightful compensation. Our firm holds an immeasurable commitment to standing up for victims of spinal cord injuries. Backed by years of experience and profound knowledge in personal injury law, Carlson Bier attorneys work tirelessly to ensure justice is served. We meticulously examine every element of each client’s case and apply sophisticated strategies aimed at maximizing your recovery process legally – emotionally as well as financially. At Carlson Bier, we appreciate the delicacy surrounding such devastating events; thus, our approach emphasizes sensitivity while attaining results that compensate properly for physical human loss. Looking for effective legal assistance following a spinal cord injury requires thoughtful decision-making; however you’re not alone – with dedication expertise helped many navigate complexities towards triumphant outcomes makes us unparalleled choice your journey seeking justice.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Dawson Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the repercussions of Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI) and are committed to offering comprehensive legal support to victims in Illinois. SCI is a serious type of personal injury that results from sudden, traumatic blows to your spine causing fractures or dislocation of vertebrae. It disrupts the normal functions of your spinal cord resulting in partial or complete loss of sensory and motor functions.

Post-injury life represents significant physical, emotional, and financial challenges for victims and their families. Many victims are left unable to work owing to long-term disability, while others face exorbitant medical expenses for rehabilitation and therapy. Our team of professional attorneys provides exhaustive consultation and representation for individuals who have suffered spinal cord injuries due to someone else’s negligence.

As Carlson Bier specialized personal injury lawyers based in Illinois, we delve deep into the aspects pertaining to SCI – involving its many classifications each carrying distinct implications legally:

– Complete: This involves total loss of all motor function below a certain level on the body where the trauma took place.

– Incomplete: Some functionality remains beneath the primary level affected by trauma.

– Tetraplegia or quadriplegia: Indicates paralysis from neck downwards.

– Paraplegia: Implies paralysis from waist downwards.

These vast categories all carry varying degrees of impact on an individual’s daily life; sometimes relegating them entirely dependent on care providers among other implausible situations.

Our skilled team works meticulously at establishing liability in cases involving SCI stemming from events like car accidents, sports injuries, falls, assault incidents or complications during surgery – which can lead back to either negligent behavior such as drunk driving or breach of duty by healthcare practitioners respectively. We believe it’s our moral obligation primarily towards ensuring you are rightfully compensated for your pain & suffering plus medical expenses brought upon through no fault but rather due uncontrollable circumstances beyond control thereby falling squarely under premise “duty care.”

Moreover, recognizing the intricacies of Illinois law, our dedicated lawyers also lay emphasis on seeking additional compensation considering factors including but not limited to lost wages, loss of earning potential and lose one’s enjoyment of life. To ensure best representation possible during these proceedings – we undertake understanding full impact suffered post-injury that has inevitably disrupted your routine thus fundamentally impacting overall quality of life.

At Carlson Bier, each Spinal Cord Injury case is uniquely assessed ensuring thorough understanding all aspects before crafting compelling legal arguments for maximizing our clients’ rightful compensation. We adopt a result-oriented approach backed by decades-long combined experience within field allowing us to consistently deliver unparalleled results in favor victims.

For anyone residing in Illinois undergoing spinal cord injury related challenges owing negligence third party – Carlson Bier assures steadfast support. As a leading personal injury attorney group focused on advocating for individuals affected by SCI; we offer impeccable track record litigating these cases while being firmly rooted across principles compassion, integrity respect towards clients stepping alongside them this trying journey.

Your spinal cord injury doesn’t have to define you. Let the experts at Carlson Bier navigate the complexities of the legal world, rippling through your life’s circumstances post-injury towards generating positive outcomes in your court battle over personal injuries. Tap into our specialist strength today and find out what your case could possibly be worth by clicking on the button below – here lies opportunity stare adversity face reclaim what was unjustly taken away.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Dawson Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Dawson

Areas of Practice in Dawson

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Proficient in legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or unsafe conditions.

Scald Burns

Supplying specialist legal assistance for people of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Healthcare Malpractice

Extending expert legal support for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Fault

Addressing cases involving dangerous products, supplying expert legal assistance to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Malpractice

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble and Fall Occurrences

Skilled in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking compensation for their suffering.

Childbirth Damages

Supplying legal support for families affected by medical negligence resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Incidents

Crashes: Dedicated to guiding victims of car accidents secure equitable compensation for wounds and destruction.

Motorbike Collisions

Committed to providing legal support for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Truck Accident

Ensuring expert legal representation for persons involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for harms.

Building Site Mishaps

Dedicated to supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Cerebral Injuries

Dedicated to providing dedicated legal services for patients suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Harms

Specialized in dealing with cases for people who have suffered harms from dog bites or beast attacks.

Jogger Crashes

Expert in legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unjust Passing

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and expert legal guidance to ensure justice.

Neural Trauma

Focused on advocating for victims with spinal cord injuries, offering expert legal guidance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​