FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Dayton

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a spinal cord injury can be an overwhelming experience, often inducing stress and uncertainty. At Carlson Bier, we are dedicated to offering the highest caliber of legal support for those affected by these debilitating injuries in Dayton and its environs. Regardless of how severe your condition may seem, we provide compassionate yet effective representation so that you’re not alone during this challenging time. Our wealth of knowledge regarding federal and Ohio State laws surrounding personal injury cases gives us the means to proclaim your rights tenaciously in court or at negotiation tables effectively. We fully understand the intricacies involved in spinal cord injuries litigation reflecting our specialized focus on every aspect, thus making us a premier partner when seeking justice for such injuries supposed caused by negligence or recklessness from others. Acknowledging the importance of professional guidance after a devastating event like a spinal cord injury is crucial; hence carefully picking Carlson Bier as your dedicated law group might significantly impact pushing forward towards healing while securing satisfactory compensation grounded on unwavering commitment upheld legally.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Dayton Illinois

Carlson Bier is a trusted personal injury law firm in Illinois, specializing in a plethora of cases that involve serious harm sustained due to another’s negligence or deliberate act. Substantial expertise has been developed within the domain of spinal cord injuries; an area which we feel deserves closer attention given its significant impact on the lives of victims.

Spinal Cord Injuries(SCIs) have severe and life-altering consequences both physically and emotionally. What sets them apart from other injuries is they are typically instantaneous – one unfortunate incident can culminate into enduring pain and disability, affecting not only mobility but also independence. Such devastating implications surge past physical suffering into areas like emotional trauma, loss of job prospects, climb in medical expenses, and reduced quality of life.

A key point in understanding SCIs is recognizing primary versus secondary injury events. Primary injuries occur at the moment of impact – when the spine takes sudden trauma leading to fractures or dislocation. Secondary injuries evolve progressively over time as resultants – swelling, inflammation, or bleeding around the spinal region – introducing further complications by impairing nervous system functions.

However terrifying it may seem, our role as your attorneys is to support you through this daunting process while seeking rightful compensation for your ordeal. Experienced professionals at Carlson Bier consider various factors that contribute to potential settlements: ongoing medical bills, future care costs including rehabilitation therapy if applicable, lost wages or diminished earning capacity along with non-economic damages such as pain and suffering arising from SCI.

It behooves those affected by these heartbreaking circumstances to promptly seek legal guidance considering strict statute limitations within which personal injury claims must be filed under Illinois law.

Navigating intricate details associated with liability laws in SCI cases requires forensic acumen every step of legal proceedings- identifying responsible parties be it manufacturers (product defect), property owners(premises liability) or other entities(public places); gathering compelling evidence; liaising with health experts to rationalize levelled allegations; advancing strong arguments in judicious forums – a mere glimpse of proactive measures Carlson Bier execute to arm your claim with highest recovery chances.

We, at Carlson Bier believe firmly in building trust – while our successful track record gives credence to our promise of formidable representation; we’d also like you to know that empathy forms core underpinning of our professional approach as we echo your pain and frustrations throughout this relentless pursuit of justice. We adopt the shield and the sword, defending your rights whilst taking aggressive recourse for recovering due compensation.

Embrace new hope amidst these turbulent times as our dedicated team stands by anticipating every question and providing comprehensive legal advice relatable to your unique circumstances– from consulting health specialists who will help evaluate present & future medical requirements (to hone settlement targets) right up through insurance dealings targeting fair outcomes without unnecessary prolongation of the restitution process.

Remember, spinal cord injuries present manifold challenges but armed with knowledge and backed by steadfast legal support such as ours; each step taken towards claiming rightful restitution brings you closer towards rebuilding disrupted life bearings.

Armed with an understanding about SCIs, their implications on affected lives compounded further due strenuous endeavours warranted for procuring appropriate claims – invoke the courage within to seek justified reparations! Click the button below now to ascertain an estimated value for your case. It’s time you recognized just how robust a stance can be built around a legion of facts supporting your cause. Rest assured, Carlson Bier stands fortified- all geared up in returning power back into your hands!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Dayton Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Dayton

Areas of Practice in Dayton

Cycling Incidents

Expert in legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Fire Burns

Offering adept legal help for individuals of major burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Clinical Malpractice

Delivering experienced legal representation for clients affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Commodities Accountability

Managing cases involving faulty products, offering adept legal help to clients affected by harmful products.

Aged Neglect

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Slip and Stumble Occurrences

Skilled in managing stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking redress for their suffering.

Birth Harms

Delivering legal support for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in infant injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Incidents: Concentrated on helping victims of car accidents get reasonable settlement for damages and damages.

Bike Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal advice for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

18-Wheeler Collision

Extending adept legal services for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair claims for injuries.

Building Crashes

Focused on advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Cerebral Damages

Focused on ensuring specialized legal advice for victims suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Harms

Specialized in tackling cases for persons who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Accidents

Expert in legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Demise

Working for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and experienced legal assistance to ensure compensation.

Neural Impairment

Committed to defending victims with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal representation to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440