...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in De Soto

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a dog bite injury can be traumatic and may result in substantial damages. Carlson Bier, a reputable Illinois law firm, specializes in personal injury cases particularly linked to canine attacks showing an extensive grasp on this niche in the complex world of law. With unrivaled expertise and compassion that they bring into each case, your quest for justice will not seem as daunting. The team at Carlson Bier understands the specific nuances of such injuries: physical harm, emotional trauma or even potential infection risks associated with bites. Skilled attorneys navigate through these intricacies to substantiate your claim effectively aligning with the stringent Illinois laws on dog bites. Offering personalized attention to detail that every victim deserves our professionals ensure a tenacious battle against insurance companies failing to offer fair compensation owing falsely calculated claims based solely around property damage laws ignoring emotional distress inflicted by animal attacks.. Trust cram_ne_carlson bier_?{carlson}” for their stellar representation skills coupled with empathy genuinely extending beyond their professional duty making them standout amid various legal firms so choose wisely – Choose Carlson Bier!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in De Soto Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are your premier personal injury law group in Illinois dedicated to representing victims of dog bite injuries. Being bitten or attacked by a dog can be an extremely frightening experience that often results in significant physical and emotional harm. Some of the most common injuries include puncture wounds, scarring, infections like rabies or tetanus, nerve damage as well as significant emotional trauma such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

What sets us apart is our extensive knowledge about animal behavior and breed-specific laws, which helps provide the backbone for building a comprehensive case on your behalf. This isn’t just limited to understanding patterns of canine behavior; it requires familiarity with nuanced legalities surrounding them too.

In Illinois, under the Animal Control Act, when a pet owner fails to control their pet resulting in a non-provoked attack, they can be held accountable for medical expenses and any necessary plastic surgery needed due to disfigurement caused by the incident. Notably –

• The dog doesn’t need to have had previous dangerous tendencies.

• Provocation is considered on various factors: the age & conduct of the victim etc.

• If there was no provocation & you were legally allowed at where you were bitten – then you might not even have fault assessed against you.

It’s vital that all incidents are reported promptly regardless of severity because this information forms key evidence should legal intervention become necessary later. Therefore, after ensuring your safety:

– Seek immediate medical attention.

– Document everything – pictures from different angles show extent & type of wound(s), location of occurrence highlighting lack of precautions if applicable etc.

– Preserve clothing damaged during incident (do NOT wash).

– Gather witness contact details if possible.

Once these steps are followed diligently reducing chances for speculation on circumstances leading up to an attack whilst establishing patterns assisting investigate potential negligence – it significantly increases likelihood towards successful resolution depending upon scope adversaries employ mitigating their liability.

While we hope that you will never have to face such a traumatic experience, it is imperative to be informed about your rights and how a dedicated law firm like Carlson Bier can help protect them. Our meticulously crafted approach ensures you receive quality medical care while we pursue maximum compensation for your losses.

The legal system may seem bewildering or possibly daunting– but we’re here every step of the way providing support during this testing time. You are not alone – In fact; our team has provided top-tier personalized representation, achieving significant settlements over decades for countless clients experiencing similar incidents.

But even excellent attorneys might falter without sufficient resources – Thankfully at Carlson Bier, our resources & proficiency mean complex litigation battles involving larger entities won’t dissuade us from effectively holding responsible parties accountable.

At any juncture where questions concerning your ordeal rear up, don’t hesitate to reach out – We offer free consultations where our attorneys assess specifics towards understanding feasibility concerning claims filed against liable individuals/corporate bodies including insurance company contingencies encountered reassuring clear roadmap of methods seeking closure through justice served in favor.

When it comes to finding an advocate whose main concern is empowering victims regain control over lives restoring peace of mind they deserve – Choose Carlson Bier; our dedication guarantees commitment towards helping deliver results exceeding expectations. Click on the button below now to find out what your case could potentially be worth—We’ve got nothing but time and dedication!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For De Soto Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in De Soto

Areas of Practice in De Soto

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Expert in legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or risky conditions.

Fire Traumas

Providing expert legal services for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Hospital Incompetence

Delivering expert legal support for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Accountability

Managing cases involving unsafe products, offering expert legal support to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Neglect

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Trip and Fall Mishaps

Expert in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal representation to individuals seeking redress for their losses.

Neonatal Harms

Delivering legal support for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Car Mishaps

Crashes: Dedicated to supporting clients of car accidents secure appropriate payout for harms and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Expert in providing legal advice for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

18-Wheeler Accident

Ensuring adept legal services for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing fair claims for hurts.

Construction Site Incidents

Dedicated to assisting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Cognitive Traumas

Expert in providing professional legal support for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Damages

Adept at tackling cases for victims who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Specializing in legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering compensation.

Unjust Loss

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and professional legal representation to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Damage

Expert in defending persons with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​