...

Bicycle Accidents in Delavan

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the aftermath of a bicycle accident, Carlson Bier stands as an unparalleled choice in legal representation. This highly esteemed personal injury attorney group has specialized experience in handling Bicycle accidents law intricacies and is dedicated to bring their depth knowledge to serve clients battling for justice and rightful compensation. With our unyielding commitment towards client satisfaction, we strategically navigate the complexities surrounding each case, ensuring optimum outcomes. Grounded on astute judgment and comprehensive understanding of Illinois laws pertaining to bicycle accidents, Carlson Bier unfolds pathways that lead only towards success without unnecessary delays or compromises. While being vigilant about ethical advertising standards reinforced by Illinois regulations, we express utmost resolve serving clients far beyond geographical barriers despite not having physical presence therein; your location never hinders our boundless dedication or capability to represent you effectively. Choosing Carlson Bier guarantees steadfast legal aid committed wholly towards safeguarding your rights after a Bicycle Accident anywhere around the state including Delavan city indeed.

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Delavan Illinois

With extensive experience and a razor-sharp focus on personal injury law, Carlson Bier is among the leading authorities when it comes to representing victims of accidents, particularly bicycle accidents in Illinois. Our attorneys come equipped with an intricate understanding of the complexities surrounding these cases, poured seamlessly into our robust portfolio as unequivocal proof of our dedication towards protecting your rights and ensuring you receive rightful compensation for damages sustained.

Bicycle-related accidents often lead to debilitating injuries that can significantly affect one’s physical well-being and financial situation. At Carlson Bier, we’re acutely aware of this reality. That’s why we pull away no stone unturned when assembling comprehensive claims tailored specifically to meet unique legal needs pertaining to bicycling accident cases. With an impeccable record of securing favorable verdicts and settlements for our esteemed clients, we take great pride in graphing a trajectory towards victory for those whose lives have been jolted by bicycling incidents.

Key Aspects about Bicycle Accidents:

• Cyclists are entitled to the same rights as drivers: A factor often overlooked is that cyclists possess identical rights as motorists on roads. They are justified in occupying a full lane if necessary and have the right-of-way during certain situations.

• Helmet use does not govern liability: Not wearing a helmet while cycling does not necessarily prove negligence on your part or exempt the motorist from liability should an accident occur.

• Shared fault could decrease award value: Illinois follows comparative negligence laws where if you were partially at fault in causing the incident — your reward might be reduced relative to your share of blame.

These concepts only scratch the surface; bicycle accident law is layered with complexities which need expert navigation — this is how Carlson Bier strives to make a valuable difference.

At Carlson Bier, our services are underpinned by deep respect for each client’s individual circumstances coupled with undeterred resolve fuelled by years of skillful practice. You become part of our family as we, step by step, unravel the complexities of your case and streamline the legal process to ensure it’s more digestible for you. Our attorneys dedicate themselves to bolstering strategies that would stand the test in court while ensuring they’re comprehensible enough so you understand every phase.

The aftermath of a bicycle accident can be both overwhelming and intimidating; our team is tailor-made for this challenge. We are committed to providing ardent representation that corners no short cuts, regardless of the circumstances surrounding your case – whether it involves hit-and-run, drunk driving, or distracted driving incidents.

Accidents turn lives upside down in seconds – but securing ample compensation shouldn’t drag on forever. At Carlson Bier, with our powerful blend of personal injury know-how and bicycling-specific expertise — we strive tirelessly towards achieving timely resolution. Your peace-of-mind during recovery is pivotal. You focus on getting better while we concentrate on building an unassailable case for justice to prevail.

Last paragraph:

The journey towards rightful compensation begins here at Carlson Bier. Navigate through the foggy roads post-accident with unwavering support from a team of Illinois-based experts specializing in personal injury law — specifically concerning bicycle accidents. Click on the button below now to gain an insight into how much your case could potentially be worth; remember there’s strength in starting early — strength found abundantly here at Carlson Bier where you aren’t just another statistic but a valued member of our everyday success stories.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Delavan Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Delavan

Areas of Practice in Delavan

Cycling Incidents

Dedicated to legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Fire Injuries

Giving adept legal services for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Physician Malpractice

Extending experienced legal assistance for persons affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Accountability

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, supplying adept legal services to clients affected by faulty goods.

Elder Neglect

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip & Tumble Injuries

Skilled in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking redress for their harm.

Childbirth Injuries

Delivering legal support for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Mishaps

Collisions: Committed to assisting patients of car accidents receive appropriate compensation for wounds and harm.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Expert in providing representation for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Big Rig Incident

Providing experienced legal representation for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for harms.

Building Mishaps

Focused on representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Neurological Harms

Focused on offering professional legal representation for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Traumas

Specialized in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered harms from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Jogger Mishaps

Specializing in legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Wrongful Fatality

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and skilled legal assistance to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Dedicated to supporting victims with vertebral damage, offering expert legal guidance to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer