FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Depue

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from dog bite injuries can be profoundly traumatic, disrupting your peace and security. Carlson Bier is the go-to law firm for comprehensive representation in Depue, Illinois. As accomplished attorneys specializing in personal injury lawsuits, we understand the immense stress inflicted by such unfortunate accidents. Don’t allow insurance companies to undervalue your claim; let us fight diligently for you to ensure just compensation for medical bills or emotional distress resulting from a dog bite accident under the Animal Control Act’s guidelines. Our commitment stands tall on our long-standing reputation of unrivaled excellence in handling various injury disputes including dog bites cases with optimal success rates – true testament to our expertise. Carlson Bier holds steadfast dedication on personalised attention to each case and thorough investigation skills giving victims an upper hand during lawsuit proceedings. When seeking proficient legal assistance after a dog attack incident within Depue vicinity, consider Carlson Bier—the key towards securing significant recovery while abiding wholly by Illinois regulations regarding law practice standards as well as advertisement ethics.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Depue Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we represent the cause of dog bite victims with steadfast dedication and expertise accrued over our years of practice in Illinois. Dog bites can result in not only physical harm but also psychological trauma that festers over time. We strive to illuminate your path to justice after succumbing to such a traumatizing incident.

Dog attacks, though usually uncommon, can lead to severe injuries or emotional distress when they occur. It is estimated that around 4.5 million people are bitten by dogs each year in the United States alone! Among these casualties, children count for the majority and often carry enduring scars both externally and internally.

The laws surrounding dog bites are explicitly enshrined within the confines of liability law under the umbrella of personal injury law in Illinois. These bits of legislation dictate that a pet owner is fully liable if their animal injures another person without provocation on public property or while legally upon private property.

• The “one-bite rule”, which granted an exception for first-time incidents, no longer holds sway as per Illinois Law.

• Defenses like provocation, trespassing or committing other crimes may absolve owners from full liability.

• Correction officers’ canine units are exempted if they bite during official duties provided there was no negligence involved.

If you have been a victim of a dog attack, you must be made aware of certain key steps integral to preserving your rights:

1. Seek immediate medical assistance: This not only protects your health but also serves as documented proof of injury necessary for potential claims.

2. Report the incident: Report what transpired promptly to local health authorities or animal control officials.

3. Gather evidence: Photographs, witness accounts, dog ownership details can all play pivotal roles in solidifying your case.

4. Consult with an attorney: It’s crucially pertinent to seek guidance from a seasoned attorney who specializes in personal injury cases involving dog attacks.

Navigating through the legal labyrinth can be daunting, especially during a stressful time of recovery. That’s where Carlson Bier steps in. Our proficient team meticulously handles each case from inception to resolution on your behalf while maintaining open, candid communication throughout the entire process.

Successful claims could potentially cover costs related to medical expenses, trauma counseling, lost wages due to inability to work, loss of earning capacity for severe injuries that extend incapacitation into the future and suffering inflicted upon you along with further potential damages.

It is noteworthy that Illinois operates under a statute of limitations for personal injury cases – generally allowing only two years post-incident to file a claim. Acting promptly can keep precious legal options within reach and preclude any tightening constraints from closing off viable pursuit paths.

With our uncompromising commitment at Carlson Bier, we pledge to vigorously advocate for you so as not just ease this burden but set a precedent preventing future occurrences. We operate with transparency rooted in an empathetic understanding of each individual case and its subsequent unique needs. We place immense value on forging personalized attorney-client relationships designed for comfort and efficiency amidst these trying times.

It’s time you knew what rights are yours by law after suffering such painful experiences which were no fault of your own! Find out how much your case might truly merit without delay. Each minute spent wondering might equate to valuable resources wasted that ideally should have been channeled towards mending the harm wrought upon you or your loved ones.

Don’t let another dog bite go unaddressed! Your justice doesn’t have to suffer in silence anymore. If you’re ready for firm action directed to restore some semblance of normalcy into your life coupled with well-deserved relief, click on the button below now! Discover how much your unique case is worth today because it’s both critical and consequential; every victim deserves their day at court…and rightfully so!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Depue Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Depue

Areas of Practice in Depue

Bicycle Accidents

Proficient in legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or risky conditions.

Thermal Traumas

Extending expert legal help for people of intense burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Clinical Carelessness

Offering expert legal assistance for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Fault

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, delivering adept legal guidance to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Neglect

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring protection.

Slip and Slip Accidents

Specialist in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to persons seeking compensation for their injuries.

Newborn Wounds

Supplying legal aid for families affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Collisions

Mishaps: Dedicated to supporting patients of car accidents receive just remuneration for damages and destruction.

Motorbike Accidents

Expert in providing legal services for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

18-Wheeler Incident

Extending adept legal representation for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recovery for injuries.

Worksite Collisions

Engaged in advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Head Injuries

Focused on extending specialized legal services for persons suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Wounds

Adept at addressing cases for victims who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Focused on legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Passing

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and adept legal services to ensure compensation.

Backbone Damage

Specializing in representing victims with vertebral damage, offering professional legal representation to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440