FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Des Plaines

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the unforeseen trauma of a dog bite injury, you require reliable legal representation to navigate the complexities of Illinois law. Carlson Bier is your optimal partner in ensuring justice and fair compensation for any harm incurred. Our expert attorneys specialize in personal injury cases including dog bite injuries. We are well-versed with Des Plaines’ unique demographic, cultural context, and local judiciary precedents – crucial insights that aid courtroom success despite not being physically located here. Our impeccable reputation stems from our track record of vigorously championed claims leading to significant settlements for clients across varying locales within Illinois. At Carlson Bier, we promise swift action while empathetically understanding your pain and its impact on your life quality. Also noteworthy is our transparent fee structure devoid of hidden costs – we only charge after successful case resolution! Trust us at Carlson Bier as your first step towards recuperation post a distressing dog bite injury incident.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Des Plaines Illinois

Dog bite injuries can be traumatic and have long-lasting impacts on the victims’ physical health as well as their psychological well-being. Here at Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury law, comprehending intensely the gravity of your situation, and upholding an unwavering commitment to aid our clients throughout Illinois who have been affected by such unfortunate events.

A dog bite incident is hardly ever a minor issue. In 2020 alone, it was reported that nearly one in five of those bitten by dogs required medical attention for their wounds. Furthermore, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates thousands undergo reconstructive surgery due to severe dog bites each year.

Being committed Illinois personal injury attorneys, we understand that following such an incident numerous concerns could arise:

– The extent of medical expenses

– Time off work and lost wages

– Psychological trauma accompanied by therapy costs

These worries may seemingly insurmountable right now but rest assured that at Carlson Bier law firm we are equipped with the expertise to guide you adeptly through this difficult time. Our professional team will strive relentlessly to recover these costs from those responsible so you can focus solely on reaching restoration.

Michigan City data reveals over half Arizona residents own pets. Regrettably though, not every pet owner acts responsibly which escalates potential risks resulting in innocent people being injured by aggressive dogs. When these tragedies occur due to neglect or violation of leash laws or confined space regulations by irresponsible owners, legal action should follow suit.

Seeking compensation independently without professional help can be extremely daunting and challenging given the intricate maze composed of state-specific laws pertaining to dog bites. Remember-

– There’s no universal set pattern for awards.

– Compensation varies depending upon numerous factors—including severity of injuries.

– It takes seasoned professionals like us who are familiar with local jurisdiction and possess a wealth of experience dealing with similar cases successfully to ensure optimal justice is served.

Helping countless victims garner significant compensation for dog bite injuries, our firm is committed to aiding you negotiate not only medical bills but additional losses such as lost wages and ongoing therapy costs.

If you or a loved one has been the unfortunate victim of a dog bite injury, remember that it’s essential to document everything from the incident. This includes-

– The identity of the dog owner

– Witnesses’ contact information

– Medical records and expenses

Having a score of qualified Illinois personal injury attorneys, Carlson Bier comprehends each case at its individual level, assessing all factors vigilantly before devising an action plan because having thorough documentation strengthens your claim exponentially!

While we cannot turn back time and undo what happened, we can certainly work towards improving conditions post this traumatizing experience. It’s important not to let fear overshadow your justice—reach out to us today!

We comprehend how daunting these circumstances may be which is why our intention goes way beyond merely unleashing platitudes. Our commitment lies in making this journey easier for you by shouldering legal burdens while you focus on healing psychologically as well as physically.

You have rights under Illinois law if you’ve been injured by someone else’s pet. We invite you to click the button below now for a detailed evaluation of how much your case might worth. You’re under no obligation whatsoever nor do owe us anything unless we win your case! Trust Carlson Bier; allow us to advocate zealously on your behalf so that together we can forge ahead establishing not just accountability but also ensuring due restitution aligning with fairness and justice prevails!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Des Plaines Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Des Plaines

Areas of Practice in Des Plaines

Bicycle Accidents

Proficient in legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or perilous conditions.

Flame Injuries

Providing professional legal help for victims of grave burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Hospital Misconduct

Extending experienced legal support for persons affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Responsibility

Addressing cases involving problematic products, delivering expert legal services to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Abuse

Protecting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip & Fall Mishaps

Adept in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking justice for their suffering.

Birth Wounds

Supplying legal assistance for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Incidents

Accidents: Dedicated to assisting clients of car accidents obtain just compensation for hurts and losses.

Motorbike Collisions

Committed to providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

18-Wheeler Crash

Providing specialist legal representation for drivers involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for damages.

Building Site Mishaps

Engaged in supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Neurological Impairments

Focused on providing expert legal services for patients suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Wounds

Specialized in tackling cases for clients who have suffered harms from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Accidents

Committed to legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Death

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and expert legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Spine Harm

Expert in defending victims with spine impairments, offering professional legal representation to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440