FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in Des Plaines

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with Slip And Fall Accidents, time is of the essence; that’s why you need a reliable and experienced attorney group like Carlson Bier. With a well-established reputation throughout Illinois, our legal team prioritizes your best interests every step of the way. We’re committed to making sure those at fault are held accountable for their negligence. In the face of any slip and fall incident occurring in Des Plaines, it’s crucial to have competent lawyers who understand local conditions and regulations fully engaged on your case. That’s where we come into play – astute analysis backed by comprehensive knowledge of injury law specific to Des Plaines’ unique context is part of what sets us apart from other firms servicing this area.

The formidable experience endowed in our firm allows us not just ensure justice but also negotiate fitting compensation for your suffering—physical or emotional. Trusting Carlson Bier means choosing unparalleled service tailored exclusively for you.

Please note: while we don’t have a physical office in Des Plaines, we serve clients across Illinois seamlessly thanks to our digital efficiency!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in Des Plaines Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that Slip and Fall Accidents can occur unexpectedly and have catastrophic consequences. Our experienced personal injury attorneys champion your rights, walking with you every step of the way as you navigate this difficult chapter in your life.

Slip and fall accidents come under the umbrella of premises liability claims within the larger field of personal injury law. These incidents occur due to dangerous or dilapidated conditions on another person’s property – residential or commercial. It could be a wet floor at a store, an icy walkway outside an office building, uneven flooring at a home, or numerous other scenarios. To successfully establish legal footing in slip and fall accident cases necessitates demonstrating that the property owner was negligent.

Negligence in these cases is demonstrated by proving one of three things:

• The property owner or an employee must have caused the slippery surface, worn spot, or dangerous bulge or tear on which the accident took place.

• The property owner was aware of the dangerous condition but failed to address it.

• A “reasonable” person taking care would have noticed and addressed the problematic situation.

Building a successful case requires evidentiary support for any assertions made above – this may encompass written reports, testimonies from witnesses/victims, video footage if available amongst others.

Additionally, two significant factors play vital roles in shaping such lawsuits: comparative negligence & statute of limitations. Comparative negligence assesses whether you contributed to your own injuries by acting negligently; hence its consideration during trials mainly influences potential compensation amounts significantly. On the other hand, Illinois’ statute-of-limitations law gives victims two years from when they became aware (or should’ve become) about their injuries resulting from slip-and-fall incidents to initiate lawsuit processes.

Ultimately though? Matters surrounding personal injury laws – especially concerning slip-and-fall situations – are intricate requiring holistic understanding coupled with sharp legal acumen; employing professional assistance becomes quintessential here for pursuing fair compensation demands.

As part of the Carlson Bier team commitment, we ensure comprehensive understanding of your unique circumstances using specialized legal strategies to build a strong case initiative. Our objective, always, is to get you the maximum amount of compensation for your medical bills, lost wages due to inability to work or reduced capacity to earn and pain and suffering.

Decades-long experience with slip-and-fall accidents cases across Illinois assists our professional counsel in overcoming complexities associated with these personal injury claims uniquely. As we emphasize integrity alongside justice, you’re secured by competent representation ensuring that negligence-caused lifestyles disruptions are not merely endured — they’re reckoned & righted!

Remember though – it’s crucial not initiating claims procedures without sound understanding about potential rewards; assessing ‘damages’ accurately becomes an elementary step before venturing into lawsuits. This involves knowing whats ‘at stake’, translating into critical decisions influencing favorable lawsuit outcomes.

Curious about what your case might be worth? Don’t let uncertainty hold you back from seeking the compensation and justice you deserve. Click on the button below for a free evaluation and find out how much your case could potentially yield – putting first steps forward toward regaining control over life’s unpredicted slips! At Carlson Bier, where expertise meets empathy, we believe in driving positive change one case at a time – yours!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Des Plaines Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Des Plaines

Areas of Practice in Des Plaines

Bike Collisions

Dedicated to legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Giving expert legal advice for victims of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Healthcare Negligence

Providing experienced legal assistance for persons affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Commodities Liability

Managing cases involving defective products, offering professional legal help to individuals affected by harmful products.

Elder Misconduct

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip and Fall Incidents

Adept in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking compensation for their harm.

Birth Traumas

Delivering legal aid for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Crashes: Concentrated on assisting individuals of car accidents obtain equitable remuneration for harms and damages.

Motorcycle Crashes

Focused on providing legal support for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for harm.

Semi Crash

Providing professional legal services for persons involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for hurts.

Construction Site Mishaps

Dedicated to supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Brain Traumas

Focused on offering professional legal services for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Injuries

Skilled in addressing cases for clients who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Expert in legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Demise

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and experienced legal support to ensure justice.

Spine Impairment

Expert in advocating for persons with spine impairments, offering professional legal services to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440