FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Des Plaines

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve suffered a spinal cord injury in the Des Plaines area, Carlson Bier is your most reliable legal recourse. We are highly specialized in representing and safeguarding interests of victims with devastating back injuries often resulting from car accidents, falls or other incidents. Our expert attorneys possess essential knowledge for handling complex issues arising from spinal cord injuries, including medical costs, benefits claims and lastly seeking rightful compensation for pain and suffering endured. By engaging Carlson Bier as your personal injury lawyer firm based in Illinois guarantees strict adherence to the highest standards of professional integrity alongside vigorous representation that our esteemed clients duly deserve. We not only provide astute advice but also tactical legal guidance aimed at achieving promising outcomes for all our clientele pertaining to their predicaments because at Carlson Bier we believe every case deserves justice. Your plight matters; let us guide you through with compassion while assuring uncompromising representation towards securing victory against those liable for causing such life-altering harm close to home.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Des Plaines Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we give meticulous attention and tireless advocacy to those who have suffered Spinal Cord Injuries due to another party’s negligence. A spinal cord injury is a severe and often life-changing event that can happen from several incidents like motor vehicle accidents, slips and falls, or construction sites mishaps. The consequences go far beyond the immediate physical damage; it often has a profound impact on an individual’s lifestyle and general wellbeing.

Understanding the intricacies of spinal cord injuries is vital in building strong personal injury cases. There are two main types of spinal cord injuries: complete and incomplete. A complete injury results in total loss of functionality below the level of injury, while an incomplete injury translates into some operational abilities retained beneath the point of harm.

• Severity markers include paraplegia (impairment in motor or sensory function of lower extremities) and quadriplegia (total or partial loss of all four limbs’ use).

• Symptoms differ widely amongst victims but may include extreme back pain, inability to walk, paralysis in different body parts, problems with bladder control or breathing difficulties.

The complications could extend over time too:

• Potential long-term effects encompass chronic pain syndromes, depression and anxiety disorders from drastic lifestyle changes and dependency issues.

• Secondary health conditions such as respiratory problems or heart diseases might develop over time considering the significant strain this kind of trauma puts on these systems.

As you approach litigation for spinal cord injuries, having effective legal aid provided by knowledgeable professionals becomes indispensable. At Carlson Bier, our seasoned team works relentlessly towards your rightful settlement claim using knowledge stemming from decades-long experience dealing with similar cases across Illinois.

Solid evidence collection forms the backbone of successful compensation claims:

• Documentation associated with your accident scene – images or video footage

• Medical reports confirming diagnosis

• Hospital bills detailing treatment costs

These pieces help create compelling arguments that directly link the other party’s negligence to your condition escalating the chances of favorable outcomes.

Whether it involves confronting insurance companies unwilling to pay adequate compensation or taking matters to court, we are committed to securing maximum financial recovery. Litigation for spinal cord injuries typically covers the vast array of expenses like medical bills, loss of potential income due to disability, and pain & suffering endured. At Carlson Bier, our relentless pursuit stems from understanding that these compensations drastically improve our clients’ quality of life in many cases enabling them access to better healthcare and support systems.

Partnering with us provides you with clear legal advice tailored specifically around your unique circumstances. We understand that each case is as unique as the people it affects. Our approach centers around this uniqueness – leaving no stone unturned in exploring every possible avenue towards your full-fledged compensation.

Being involved in an accident resulting in a spinal cord injury is undeniably challenging on multiple fronts – be it health-wise or financing necessary treatments and adjustments needed post-accident. This journey could seem daunting; however, remember that you do not have to embark on it alone when reliable legal partners such as Carlson Bier remain a call away.

We encourage those who’ve suffered spinal cord injuries owing to someone else’s negligence not to handle this burden on their own—the pursuit for rightful compensation deserves experienced attorney services catering exclusively towards personal injury law scenarios. To discover what rights you might reserve under Illinois law and evaluate how much your case could likely be worth based upon previous similar settlements procured by us – click the button below now! Trust in your strength during this difficult time but also trust in us at Carlson Bier for achieving justice rightfully deserved.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Des Plaines Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Des Plaines

Areas of Practice in Des Plaines

Bicycle Incidents

Dedicated to legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or perilous conditions.

Scald Damages

Giving skilled legal assistance for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Medical Carelessness

Providing dedicated legal assistance for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Obligation

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, delivering skilled legal support to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Abuse

Defending the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Fall & Fall Mishaps

Specialist in handling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to individuals seeking restitution for their injuries.

Birth Harms

Providing legal assistance for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Car Collisions

Collisions: Focused on supporting sufferers of car accidents secure equitable payout for damages and losses.

Motorcycle Crashes

Expert in providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Trucking Accident

Providing specialist legal assistance for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for harms.

Building Site Accidents

Concentrated on supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Traumas

Expert in extending compassionate legal assistance for persons suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Traumas

Skilled in dealing with cases for persons who have suffered damages from dog bites or animal attacks.

Jogger Mishaps

Dedicated to legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Unfair Demise

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and adept legal support to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Dedicated to supporting victims with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440