FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Diamond

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the distressing aftermath of a dog bite injury in Diamond, one requires exceptional legal representation. Carlson Bier is an unwavering partner that families can count on to represent them diligently through this arduous process. Their familiarity and extensive experience with Illinois’ prevailing statutes provide victims with robust legal support they need while seeking compensation for physical harm or emotional trauma incurred from a canine attack. Weaving together fact-based evidence, expert testimonies, and decades-long professional expertise, Carlson Bier builds strong cases that ensure each client obtains optimal justice for their ordeal. This law firm acts as an advocate during negotiations making sure victims receive fair settlements representing medical expenses, wage losses amongst other considerations under Illinois laws governing such incidents. They tenaciously protect your rights against insurance companies’ tactics whilst ensuring all complexities are seamlessly addressed during the recovery journey . You owe it to yourself to trust only the best when dealing with life-changing injuries – seek out Carlson Bier’s team of seasoned personal injury lawyers today.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Diamond Illinois

Carlson Bier, esteemed personal injury attorney group based in Illinois, is well-versed and competent at dealing with a myriad of personal injury cases. Today we extend our expertise to educate you specifically on Dog Bite Injuries – an unfortunate circumstance that affects many individuals across the state yearly.

Dog bites may vary from minor nips or scratches, to significant injuries that can lead to physical disfigurement and psychological distress. However, these incidents don’t always translate into mere inflictions; they can also spawn unduly financial setbacks due to hefty medical bills and lost wages during recovery periods.

An integral first step following a dog bite incident is immediate medical attention. Not only does this safeguard your health by preventing potential infections or complications, but it also provides significant documentation for any future legal proceedings. Records of these incidents contribute substantially towards building a solid case.

Illinois has specific laws concerning Dog Bite Incidents under the Animal Control Act. Understanding the provisions of this law can be pivotal if you ever find yourself in such predicaments:

• Full Compensation: The victim stands eligible for complete compensation for their suffering caused by a dog bite.

• Liability Without Provocation: If the dog attacked without being threatened or incited, the responsibility automatically falls on the owner.

• “One Bite Rule” Does not Apply: This rule protects owners whose dogs have never bitten before –– Illinois does not follow this rule. Instead, it operates under strict liability laws holding owners accountable regardless of past occurrences.

At Carlson Bier, we focus on helping you understand these nuances so as to reinforce your position should you unfortunately become embroiled in such circumstances.. We firmly believe robust knowledge enables swift actions as opposed to quick decisions made out of lack of awareness which often tend to cause further damage than aid resolution.

In addition thereto, time plays an essential role and acts as key contributor in establishing your claim’s legitimacy post an incident— more often than not seen bolstering defense. Calcium deposits that form during the healing process can radically underline bite markers, while waiting to seek medical attention may restrict your ability to claim entire damages.

We understand how these situations often lead to not just physical but also profound emotional distress— and we’re right here to guide you through navigating these complex legalities. Our seasoned team of professional attorneys has dedicated their careers in personal injury law, with an exemplary track record that testifies their expertise especially pertaining to dog bites incidents, reflecting not just our know-how but observantly efficient assistance and representational skills.

Carlson Bier takes immense pride in fighting for the rights of victims involved in dog bite cases. Alongside ensuring justice being met out rightfully, we hold a steadfast belief that no victim should bear undesired financial strains due to another’s negligence – provoking us towards maximising compensatory gains on behalf of aggrieved individuals.

Take advantage of our extensive experience and unmatched resources. Let Carlson Bier direct you on the road to recovery, both physically and financially from unwanted trauma ensuing desolate experiences such as dog bites . Equipped with comprehensive knowledge about laws related thereto alongside practical exposure- experience handling real life instances, we assure optimum results best suited favouring you above all else .

With numerous uncertainties hanging around post any injurious incident like so , one question which undoubtedly rattles every individual’s mind pertains valuing their claim’s worthiness . To answer this query shaping your next course action , click the button below well-adjusted understanding endorsing reasoning behind valuation attributed against your claims thereby standing at par if not above typical standards without bearing slightest hesitation or apprehension .

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Diamond Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Diamond

Areas of Practice in Diamond

Bicycle Collisions

Specializing in legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or perilous conditions.

Flame Damages

Offering specialist legal support for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Hospital Carelessness

Delivering experienced legal representation for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Fault

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, delivering adept legal assistance to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip & Fall Mishaps

Adept in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking restitution for their losses.

Neonatal Traumas

Providing legal help for households affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Accidents: Concentrated on supporting sufferers of car accidents get fair remuneration for hurts and losses.

Scooter Crashes

Expert in providing legal support for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

Big Rig Mishap

Delivering expert legal support for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for injuries.

Worksite Crashes

Committed to supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Brain Impairments

Focused on providing expert legal services for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Damages

Adept at handling cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Expert in legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Passing

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and adept legal services to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Committed to defending persons with backbone trauma, offering expert legal support to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440