FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Dieterich

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to dog bite injuries, immediate legal advice and representation become crucial. With Carlson Bier, you can expect nothing but the highest level of professionalism and expertise for your case. Our seasoned attorneys comprehend the emotions involved after a traumatic event like a dog bite injury in Dieterich. Not only do we understand Illinois law on personal injury claims from animal attacks thoroughly, but our dedication towards rectifying these unjust events is unmatched. Having successfully represented numerous cases similar to yours over several years, our team provides comprehensive coverage tailored specifically to your circumstance with proven results surpassing expectations consistently. At Carlson Bier, empathy fuels our striving efforts while commitment guides us each step of providing an assertive approach protecting your rights under difficult circumstances such as Dog Bite Injuries litigation process revealing why we’re among the preferable choices when seeking effective legal help in dealing with severe injuries inflicted by canine aggression throughout Illinois regions including Dieterich.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Dieterich Illinois

Dealing with dog bite injuries can be traumatic and challenging on their own; handling the associated legalities without professional guidance may intensify the struggle. As experienced personal injury attorneys, we at Carlson Bier understand this fully well. Our team, based out of Illinois, is at your disposal to guide you through the complexities of dog bite cases and ensure that justice is served in favor of all victims of such unfortunate incidents.

Dog bite injuries vary significantly in terms of their severity – ranging from minor nips or scratches to severe wounds resulting in permanent disfigurement, scarring or even diseases. In many instances, individuals may need physical therapy or prolonged medical care. The trauma brought about by a vicious attack often leads to psychological damage as well.

Key pointers regarding claims for Dog Bite Injuries include:

• Legally speaking, owners are liable for any harm caused by their dogs. This includes being financially responsible for medical bills incurred by someone bitten by their pet.

• Proving liability does not require one to show that they had no fault in provoking an attack; under Illinois law, owners are held ‘strictly liable’ for any attacks provoked or unprovoked.

• It’s worth noting that serious incidents involve not just high medical costs but also lost wages due to missing work during recovery periods.

Indeed, if you have been unjustly impacted by a canine’s harmful behavior instigated from carelessness or laxity on part of its owner/handler here in Illinois – you do have rights! As accomplished dog bite injury lawyers who’ve relentlessly fought for victim compensation over numerous years, Carlson Bier equips you with resolute representation tailored towards obtaining maximum recompense permitted under our state laws.

Legal proceedings related to such cases demand comprehensive knowledge of related statutes – including those pertaining animal control as well as residential lease laws when applicable – all aimed towards stringent victim protection. Since these rules continue evolving along with societal norms and perceptions revolving around pet ownership, it’s critical for your legal representative to be effectively and actively conversant with recent changes. This is exactly what we at Carlson Bier promise – timely legal guidance that keeps up with evolving laws and litigation strategies.

For those injured by dog bites who are fearful about the potential costs associated with seeking professional legal assistance, you can be assured; our team works on a contingency basis which means you are not obligated to pay unless successful in obtaining compensation for your injury.

At Carlson Bier, we understand the magnitude of emotions involved when finding yourself or loved ones bitten by dogs – fear, confusion, frustration…and then concern about impending expenses as days roll into tense waiting rooms of hospitals. Our approach goes beyond ordinary legal services; we provide emotional support and empathetic listening – offering an environment where our clients feel comfortable sharing their experiences and concerns regarding their cases. Partnering with us takes off weighty burden that comes latched to dog bite incidents from victims’ shoulders onto ours – specialists vastly experienced in this area of personal injury law.

Whether the incident involves pit bulls breeds known for aggressiveness or other dogs posing unexpected safety risks through attacks unprovoked or otherwise, enlisting services managed by seasoned experts like Carlson Bier increases chances at securing restitution satisfactorily substantial enough to cover current medical bills as well as future costs tied to physical therapies potentially needed for complete recovery.

Understanding how nerve-wracking it can be dealing with aftermaths of nasty dog attacks without slightest inkling into one’s rights uniquely positioned under diverse Illinois laws particularly tailored towards protecting victims like you inspires action on our part! Press on the button below right away to find out how much your case may be worth. We’re here waiting ready to help illuminate whatever uncertainty might currently cloud your view regarding rightful entitlements perceivable from holding careless pet owners accountable through smartly planned litigation processes proactively designed around dog bite-related injuries– fueled by an unparalleled dedication. Carlson Bier is your trusted resource for comprehensive, caring litigation in personal injury cases related to dog bites.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Dieterich Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Dieterich

Areas of Practice in Dieterich

Cycling Incidents

Proficient in legal advocacy for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Scald Wounds

Offering skilled legal services for patients of grave burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Clinical Misconduct

Ensuring professional legal services for victims affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Fault

Handling cases involving unsafe products, delivering expert legal support to individuals affected by defective items.

Senior Neglect

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble & Trip Mishaps

Expert in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking justice for their suffering.

Neonatal Traumas

Delivering legal assistance for kin affected by medical carelessness resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Collisions: Dedicated to aiding sufferers of car accidents get appropriate remuneration for damages and harm.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Specializing in providing representation for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for harm.

Trucking Crash

Extending experienced legal assistance for persons involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair claims for damages.

Construction Site Incidents

Concentrated on assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Neurological Harms

Specializing in delivering compassionate legal assistance for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

K9 Assault Injuries

Specialized in tackling cases for persons who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Jogger Incidents

Expert in legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Demise

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and expert legal support to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Harm

Dedicated to supporting persons with paralysis, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440