FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Dieterich

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one has suffered from spinal cord injuries in Dieterich, Carlson Bier’s impeccable team of experienced attorneys is prepared to fight for your rights. Our deep understanding of the devastating impact that such injuries can cause – both physically and emotionally – allows us to provide compassionate legal representation while aggressively pursuing the compensation our clients deserve. With an impressive history of achieving successful outcomes in complex spinal cord injury cases, each attorney at Carlson Bier brings profound competence coupled with relentless dedication. We strive not only to help our clients navigate through their legal battles but also aim towards ensuring they rebuild their lives post-injury confidently. As skilled negotiators and seasoned trial advocates, we have cemented our reputation as formidable personal injury lawyers capable of providing robust and strategic support at every stage of your case across Illinois state lines. Entrusting your case with Carlson Bier means securing a dedicated partner who prioritizes protecting your best interests even in the face of daunting challenges related to spinal cord injuries.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Dieterich Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that spinal cord injuries represent some of the most severe and life-changing events a person can experience. With our team of dedicated personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, we are committed to providing the necessary support, guidance, and legal representation needed during such trying times.

One of the key factors when dealing with spinal cord injuries is understanding its complexities and consequences. The spinal cord serves as an essential messenger between your brain and body; any disruption can have significant impacts on your quality of life. Spinal cord injuries often result in partial or complete paralysis, impacting the victim’s mobility and independence.

• Severity: Spinal Cord Injuries commonly classified into two categories: ‘Complete’, indicating total loss of motor function below the level of injury, and ‘Incomplete’ where there is some degree of movement or sensation remaining.

• Regions Affected: Based on where the impact occurs along the spine – Cervical (neck), Thoracic (chest), Lumbar (lower back) or Sacral (pelvis) regions – different areas of body functionality may be affected.

• Long Term Implications: These injuries often require lifelong care involving physical rehabilitation and adaptive equipment for daily living activities. They also dramatically affect earning capacity due to reduced employment possibilities.

A vital aspect when assessing spinal cord accident cases is identifying fault; was it a consequence of someone else’s negligence? If so, then typical causes include but are not limited to automobile accidents, medical malpractice surrounding surgery complications, slip-and-fall accidents due to insufficient area maintenance by property owners or even unnatural causes like violent encounters.

Analyzing these components wisely could potentially secure financial coverage for current medical expenses incurred during treatment procedures following initial trauma response—emergency surgeries mean skyrocketed bills—as well as future healthcare requirements like ongoing therapy sessions. Moreover reimbursement might extend covering lost earnings potential ensuring better financial stability.

Embracing our attorney-client relationship at Carlson Bier, we believe in empowering our clients by educating them about their legal rights and options. By depending on us for your Personal Injury Claim, you are choosing a law firm with years of experience and expertise that only focuses on personal injury lawsuits especially involving Spinal Cord Injuries.

You may wonder why it’s essential to choose a lawyer who specializes in this area? Well, not all attorneys understand the medical science behind spinal cord injuries or how insurance companies determine settlements concerning complex cases like these. Unlike others, we do! Being aware of the intricacies surrounding a victim’s ordeal- painful rehabilitation period or drastic lifestyle changes following immobilization- is what distinguishes us and shapes our comprehensive legal approach. Our team works tirelessly alongside medical experts gathering substantial evidence against negligent parties ensuring maximized compensation deserving for your pain & suffering.

We recognize navigating through such instances could be overwhelming and hence want to support by leading legally safeguarding your best interest during recuperation time. We operate on a contingency fee basis which means no upfront costs; our fees are only collected when favorable recovery is secured on your behalf.

Remember, an immediate step following accidents causing serious harm like spinal cord injury should be contacting experienced legal counsel who can leverage investigation before critical evidence vanishes adversely affecting winning possibilities.

With Carlson Bier, rest assured every aspect will be meticulously assessed—looking beyond presented facts discovering overlooked but liable entities; calculating fair compensatory sum considering all agony endured during post-injury journey including emotional distress from loss of life joys due to mobility restrictions set in place.

Please take advantage of free case evaluation today simply by clicking the button below where information will remain entirely confidential. Understanding potential worth helps clarify expectations setting realistic pursuits moving forward dealing with harrowing aftermaths.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Dieterich Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Dieterich

Areas of Practice in Dieterich

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Dedicated to legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or perilous conditions.

Scald Traumas

Extending expert legal services for patients of grave burn injuries caused by accidents or indifference.

Clinical Misconduct

Extending expert legal assistance for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Accountability

Handling cases involving dangerous products, offering adept legal guidance to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Elder Neglect

Defending the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Stumble and Slip Incidents

Professional in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking restitution for their losses.

Childbirth Traumas

Extending legal support for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Crashes

Crashes: Focused on guiding clients of car accidents gain equitable recompense for wounds and impairment.

Motorcycle Accidents

Expert in providing representation for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for traumas.

Trucking Accident

Extending specialist legal support for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for losses.

Construction Site Incidents

Committed to supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Brain Traumas

Dedicated to offering specialized legal services for individuals suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Injuries

Specialized in addressing cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or animal assaults.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Expert in legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Demise

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending empathetic and experienced legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Vertebral Injury

Focused on defending persons with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440