FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Dixmoor

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one in Dixmoor, Illinois have suffered from a dog bite injury, Carlson Bier is the reliable legal choice to help navigate through your legal geography. Dog bites can cause severe physical and emotional trauma deserving rightful compensation. At Carlson Bier, we’re committed not only to upholding your rights but also advocating for maximum compensation using our expert understanding of Illinois’ Dog Bite Injury Laws. Our dedicated team scrutinizes every facet of the case with unrivaled expertise – from understanding intricate liability laws to accurately estimating insurance claims. We leverage years of experience in providing meticulous representation for dog bite victims amidst challenging adversities and court proceedings. With proven success records reflecting our relentlessness and commitment towards clients across different cities including Dixmoor, Carlson Bier stands as an ideal partner break free from any burdens statutory limitations impose while ensuring optimal settlements are reached as swiftly as possible when dealing with dog bite injuries – safeguarding your interest irrespective of where you live within Illinois.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Dixmoor Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the emotional trauma and physical pain that result from dog bite injuries. As dedicated personal injury lawyers based in Illinois, we champion for victims’ rights by providing legal services designed to help them recover and get their lives back on track. Dog bites can lead to significant medical costs, lingering emotional distress, lost wages due to missed work days, and reduced quality of life—consequences which victims should not bear alone.

Dog bite cases have numerous intricacies that require specialized knowledge. Our knowledgeable team thoroughly understands Illinois law’s fine points regarding these incidents. Recognize that it is your right under Illinois law to recover financial compensation following a dog bite incident if the owner did not take necessary precautions or failed to control their pet adequately.

Here are some key points about dog bite cases you should know:

– A responsible party: In most situations, the dog’s owner is liable for damages.

– Negligence determination: If an owner fails in his duty of care towards others around his animal and this negligence results in a bite or attack, they could be found legally accountable.

– Strict liability Rule: Unlike other states that follow the ‘one-bite rule,’ Illinois abides by what’s known as a “strict liability” rule – meaning the victim does not need to prove the animal’s previous vicious behavior; demonstrating harm caused by an unprovoked attack secures your case legally.

Proving these elements convincingly often requires professional expertise; our experienced attorneys can effectively consolidate all needed evidence while navigating intricate legal statutes.

The aftermath of a canine attack includes more than cuts or bruises; psychological effects may last longer than visible wounds. Victims often experience post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), fear of dogs (cynophobia), distressing flashbacks, sleep disturbances among other mental health conditions that affect day-to-day living. Hence forth understanding this multidimensional impact influences how we advocate for you.

Driven by a mission to provide our clients with the best possible outcomes, we build each case meticulously, ensuring every detail is accounted for. We assess medical and psychological treatment costs, emotional distress, any loss of income, plus potential future expenses related to your injury while developing a comprehensive claim. In severe cases where plastic surgery may be required or infection might have escalated causing extensive treatments; our skilled team strategically emphasizes on serious implications from your dog bite incident seeking adequate compensations.

We consider it an honor and privilege to represent you in this overwhelming phase. With compassion and resilience as our hallmark virtues, at Carlson Bier we understand that each client’s needs are unique – thus offering tailored legal strategies reinforced with substantial resources using correct avenues only acceptable under Illinois law standards complying by location specificity rule diligently.

Despite enduring such traumatic experience remember there is hope and assistance available competently guiding you through this ordeal. We envision creating secure spaces for open dialogue prioritizing victim’s well-being above all promoting their integral recovery process effectively.

Ready to find out more? The first crucial step towards safeguarding your rights is understanding what they encompass including the worth of your case considering each identifiable damage parameter thoroughly. If you’ve been injured by a dog bite in Illinois, help is just a click away. By contacting us at Carlson Bier, not only will we work tirelessly on your behalf but also assure guidance promptly adapting according to evolving personal circumstances reassuring clients throughout their journey with us fostering long term relationships grounded in trust. Change begins here! Be encouraged to click on the button below to get an accurate appraisal – reclaim control over your narrative pursuing rightful justice rightfully entitled for you efficiently warranted by commitment excellence encapsulating Carlson Bier foundation principles meticulously striving towards client satisfaction unfailingly maintaining highest professional integrity benchmarks emanating through every interaction steering victims towards desired healing destination progressively one step at a time unwaveringly believing that You Matter Most!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Dixmoor Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Dixmoor

Areas of Practice in Dixmoor

Bicycle Crashes

Proficient in legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or unsafe conditions.

Flame Burns

Offering professional legal help for people of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or carelessness.

Hospital Misconduct

Providing specialist legal representation for victims affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Fault

Dealing with cases involving dangerous products, delivering professional legal guidance to victims affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Malpractice

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip and Fall Accidents

Skilled in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking restitution for their injuries.

Infant Wounds

Offering legal guidance for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in childbirth injuries.

Auto Accidents

Collisions: Committed to supporting sufferers of car accidents obtain equitable settlement for damages and damages.

Scooter Crashes

Committed to providing representation for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for harm.

Big Rig Incident

Ensuring professional legal representation for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair claims for harms.

Construction Mishaps

Committed to supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Head Harms

Expert in delivering dedicated legal services for victims suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Harms

Proficient in managing cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Jogger Crashes

Expert in legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Unwarranted Death

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and expert legal assistance to ensure fairness.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Expert in representing clients with backbone trauma, offering professional legal support to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​