FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Dixmoor

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with Spinal Cord Injuries, the daunting medical complexities can be overwhelming. Choosing an advocate should not add to your burden. At Carlson Bier, we specialize in handling just such cases with expertise and empathy. Our lawyers have a proven record of fighting passionately for clients’ rights and securing deserved compensation following disastrous events causing spinal cord damage. What makes us stand out? We value our client relationships greatly and work tirelessly to ensure every case is handled professionally yet personally. Residing in Illinois, we know the state laws inside-out which gives us an edge while strategizing effective legal recourse plans pertaining to Spinal Cord Injuries cases within Dixmoor’s judicial landscape, while strictly adhering to all ethical considerations outlined by the Illinois Bar Association that governs advertising ethics among attorneys practicing law within its jurisdictional purview . To navigate these challenging times confidently without unnecessary stress or confusion caused due to legal intricacies , consider Carlson Bier as your trusted advocates championing your justice journey.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Dixmoor Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we strive to empower our clients with knowledge so they can better understand the implications of their spinal cord injuries. These devastating injuries often result in life-altering consequences, which impart significant changes and challenges to those affected.

A severe injury to the spinal column mandates immediate attention as it indirectly affects every part system reliant on neuronal network. The human nervous system is primarily composed of two parts: the central and peripheral systems. The spine serves as a central conduit for this intricate network, carrying messages from various body organs to your brain. Injuries to the spinal cord may disrupt these communication channels, leading to debilitating conditions that often manifest in paralysis or loss of physical sensations.

While there are different types of Spinal Cord Injuries (SCIs), medical experts universally classify them into two broad categories; complete and incomplete SCIs. In cases where victims lose all feeling and functionality below the site of impact, such situations fall under Complete SCIs category. Conversely, if some motor or sensory functionality remains below the level of injury, you’re dealing with what’s known as an Incomplete SCI.

Victims might experience several complications due to SCIs including but not limited to:

• Chronic Pain

• Bladder control issues

• Bowel management problems

• Respiratory complications

• Circulatory problems

These challenges necessitate significant lifestyle adjustments and medical interventions – physical therapy, occupational therapies among other systematic professional assistances form a vital segment in adapting.

In Illinois, potential legal routes exist for individuals encountering such catastrophic setbacks due to someone else’s negligence or recklessness. While nothing can truly compensate for these drastic impacts on one’s life quality- seeking legal redress could pave way towards help managing mounting expenses & securing future well-being post-injury. Personal Injury litigation cycle initiates when inherent negligence led by third-party entities during respective scenarios causes unintended harm – this constitutes parameters forming bedrock for justified compensatory demands when evidence-backed caliber manifests.

Carlson Bier provides industry-leading personal injury legal representation across Illinois. We’re deeply sympathetic towards the pain that our clients are going through, and we fight fiercely for their rights to control the ramifications of these injuries on their daily lives.

We have a long-standing track record in skillfully handling Spinal Cord Injury cases, grappling diligently with responsible parties & insurance corporations over appropriate damages. Every case’s unique traits guide us in formulating compelling narrative lineups – every element folds seamlessly into strategic run-through ensuring services meeting benchmarked expectations.

Several monetary aspects exist within potential compensation models including:

• Immediate medical expenses

• Future medical costs (rehabilitation, surgeries)

• Loss of Earnings

• Reduction in future earning capacity

• Non-economic losses (pain & suffering), individual standing & relational dynamics post-injury

Carlson Bier takes pride in dynamically engaging with clientele – open forums provide candid experiences leading to shared visions fostering fortified relationships. Our compassionate legal team binds efficacy with empathy during these trying times serving 24/7 round-the-clock availability prioritizing client needs.

You shouldn’t have to navigate these tumultuous waters alone as you heal from a spinal cord injury that was not your fault. Please, take some time to register how much your potential case might be worth following an SCI occurrence by clicking “Estimate My Settlement” button below. As Carlson Bier handles each case on a contingency fee basis, remember – You don’t pay unless we win! Standing true to our guiding ethos emphasizing immersive trust setting professional precedent above all- Let’s Illuminate Pathways Leading Towards Deserved Justice together!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Dixmoor Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Dixmoor

Areas of Practice in Dixmoor

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Expert in legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or hazardous conditions.

Scald Damages

Extending specialist legal services for people of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Medical Carelessness

Ensuring experienced legal assistance for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Fault

Addressing cases involving problematic products, delivering adept legal assistance to victims affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble and Stumble Mishaps

Expert in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to persons seeking compensation for their injuries.

Childbirth Harms

Providing legal aid for loved ones affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Accidents

Collisions: Concentrated on assisting victims of car accidents obtain equitable settlement for hurts and losses.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Committed to providing legal advice for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

Truck Crash

Offering specialist legal support for persons involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for harms.

Construction Collisions

Focused on defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Head Traumas

Committed to ensuring dedicated legal representation for persons suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Injuries

Skilled in addressing cases for individuals who have suffered damages from dog bites or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Crashes

Expert in legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Unjust Passing

Working for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and experienced legal guidance to ensure justice.

Neural Harm

Expert in assisting patients with paralysis, offering professional legal support to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​