...

Bicycle Accidents in Dixon

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the wake of a bicycling accident, embarking on legal procedures can be daunting. Carlson Bier is your go-to choice for resolving bicycle-related conflicts proficiently and smoothly across Dixon. As dedicated personal injury attorneys in Illinois, our expertise spans years of dealing with varied cases, offering insightful clarity and proactive solutions to transform complex processes into manageable tasks. We are known for fostering uncompromising professional standards while staying compassionate towards our clients’ situation. Our primary focus lies in alleviating the stress involved post-accident by ensuring your rights are protected and justice prevails through fair compensation recovery procedures. What distinguishes Carlson Bier from others is unrivaled dedication coupled with an extensive understanding of biking laws intricacies that inform strategic measures delivering successful outcomes time after time. Regardless of how intricate or laborious your case might seem at a mere glance, we, at Carlson Bier strive hard to bring light even amidst toughest challenges by providing adept advice and exemplary representation throughout any bicycle accident proceedings you face.

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Dixon Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are committed to serving you with the utmost level of professionalism, compassion, and legal expertise. As dedicated personal injury attorneys in Illinois, a particular area of our specialization is bicycle accidents. Our goal is not only to represent you effectively but also to ensure that you are educated about your rights as a cyclist and the nuances of bicycle accident law.

Bicycle accidents can often lead to disastrous injuries or even fatalities; however these unfortunate events can also result in complex litigation due to certain intricacies. Establishing liability in such cases requires thorough investigation and expert understanding of law and facts. At Carlson Bier we bring years of experience in handling bicycle accident cases which allows us to navigate through this complexity and fight for your rightful compensation.

There are key factors that influence bicycle accident cases:

• Evidence Collection: Gathering crucial evidence at the scene such as photographs, witness testimony, police reports is paramount.

• Understanding Right-of-Way Laws: Disputes involving right-of-way stipulations make evident knowledge essential.

• Helmet Law Compliance: Often helmet-wearing compliance could be raised during settlement discussions or trial.

• Bicycle Maintenance Status: A fully-maintained bike might have better chances of receiving higher settlements compared to a poorly maintained one.

‎Being struck by a motor vehicle while on a bicycle can cause severe physical impacts like fractures, traumatic brain injuries, spinal cord injuries among other debilitating consequences. Moreover psychological traumas deriving from these serious incidents cannot be ignored. These ramifications inevitably lead to costly medical bills, loss of income due to incapacity for work and mental anguish causing strain on familial relationships thereby affecting overall quality life.

We guide you through filing an insurance claim if required followed by pursuing legal action all encompassed within respective statute limitations adhering stringently complying lawful guidelines. Crafting persuasive complexities litigations merging analytical proficiency attention detail litigation techniques helping prove negligence thus maximizing recovery damages ensuring justified closure conclusion case imperatively significant only mirrors dedication firm showcasing ironclad commitment towards clients.

Remember, it’s crucial that you always consult with a personal injury attorney particularly when dealing with bicycle accident cases. Carlson Bier is here to provide practical advice and comprehensive support during this strenuous time. We strive relentlessly fighting hammer tongs seeking justice clients giving undivided attention every case handling treating client unique individuals assessing evaluating components impacts ensuring nothing left unquestioned unexplored enhance chances favorable outcome.

At Carlson Bier, we passionately dedicate our efforts to stand up for your rights and secure the compensation you deserve which is reflective in our dogged commitment not only carrying out ethically but also striving endlessly meet deliver expectations fostering trust reliability thus establishing lifelong relationships.

Are you ready to fight for what you’re owed? Are you tired of being burdened by medical bills and lost wages caused by someone else’s negligence? If so, then don’t wait another moment. Find out how much your case may be worth by clicking on the button below. Trust us – as committed advocates with diligent pursuit of securing your wellbeing and safeguarding your legal interests, we are here for upright construction of tenacious representation! Your journey towards just compensation starts today with Carlson Bier at helm steering course resolute determination!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Dixon Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Dixon

Areas of Practice in Dixon

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Specializing in legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Damages

Providing expert legal services for victims of severe burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Healthcare Malpractice

Ensuring professional legal representation for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Fault

Addressing cases involving problematic products, extending expert legal guidance to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Misconduct

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip and Slip Incidents

Specialist in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal representation to victims seeking restitution for their harm.

Childbirth Harms

Providing legal support for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Crashes: Dedicated to guiding victims of car accidents get equitable settlement for wounds and losses.

Motorbike Incidents

Focused on providing legal support for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

Semi Accident

Ensuring specialist legal services for drivers involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for harms.

Construction Site Accidents

Committed to representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Cerebral Harms

Expert in ensuring expert legal support for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Injuries

Adept at handling cases for individuals who have suffered wounds from canine attacks or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Crashes

Focused on legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Death

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and skilled legal representation to ensure justice.

Vertebral Impairment

Expert in advocating for individuals with paralysis, offering expert legal guidance to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer