Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Dixon

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the unfortunate event of a pedestrian accident, your rights and wellbeing should be protected. Engaging professional legal counsel is imperative to ensuring you receive equitable treatment and justice. Among the leading professionals in this field stands Carlson Bier – an acclaimed personal injury law firm based in Illinois with unparalleled expertise covering pedestrian accidents. Possessing a deep understanding of Illinois laws governing traffic incidents, our team is equipped to provide comprehensive representation that brings peace of mind during such challenging times.

At Carlson Bier, we value empathy, sensitivity and assertive advocacy for every client we serve. By choosing us as your legal ally following a pedestrian accident, you are entrusting dedicated experts who prioritise securing long-term solutions over isolated victories.

Our relentless pursuit for just reparation reflects our commitment towards standing up against insurance companies likely to dispute their liability in pedestrian mishaps. We strive for optimal settlements or verdicts through meticulous strategies robustly grounded on fact-finding investigations relevant to each unique case’s aspects.

The prowess of Carlson Bier lies not merely within proximity but palpable in its proven record across numerous locals inclusive Dixon where residents have benefits from superior quality jurisprudence offered by us.

About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Dixon Illinois

Pedestrian accidents are an unfortunate but all too common occurrence. If you or a loved one has been involved in a pedestrian accident, Carlson Bier is here to help guide you through the complex legal process that often follows such incidents. As personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, we have extensive experience representing victims of pedestrian accidents, ensuring their rights are upheld and they receive the compensation they deserve.

Understanding the nuances of pedestrian accidents is crucial as each case presents its own unique circumstances. In most instances, these accidents involve a pedestrian struck by a motor vehicle, leading to significant injuries due to pedestrians’ lack of protective gear compared to those in vehicles. These may range from minor contusions and fractures, severe traumatic brain injuries, spinal cord damages, and in worst-case scenarios- fatal injuries leading to wrongful death cases.

Several factors contribute towards these occurrences:

• Distraction: When drivers or pedestrians are not paying attention to the road.

• Failure to yield right-of-way: Drivers often neglect giving way at crosswalks.

• Speeding: Driving above speed limit decreases reaction time.

• Impaired driving: Alcohol or drug-induced negligence can lead to collisions.

The consequences following these events are both physical and emotional trauma for victims alongside mounting financial burdens associated with medical bills and lost wages. It’s pertinent that you consult a competent attorney from Carlson Bier who can evaluate your particular situation and ensure rightful compensation demands are made on your behalf.

Facing insurance companies alone can be daunting since their primary aim reduces payouts as much as possible; hence it’s essential that victims equip themselves with proficient lawyers who understand intricacies involved – standing up against these giants proving fault on part of negligent parties while discussing settlement options if necessary.

Illinois law operates under comparative negligence theory meaning that even if partly at fault (less than 51%), able still collect damages proportionate percentage determined during proceedings. This gives room for each party involved responsibility assigned accordingly providing more comprehensive justice.

Our team at Carlson Bier also assists in gathering reliable evidence following a pedestrian accident. This includes police reports, witness testimonies, surveillance footage if available, and documentation of the victim’s injuries from medical professionals. We’ll guide you through each step of this process to strengthen your case against adverse parties involved leading to securing rightful compensation.

Due to the statute of limitations in Illinois, it is critical that victims reach out as soon as possible after an accident for a thorough consultation – usually two years from date incident occurred-but can vary depending on specific circumstances making it imperative you consult attorney promptly post-accident.

Navigating Illinois’ legal landscape alone without expert advice increases risk of falling prey unsavory tactics deployed by defense teams further adding stress upon already tumultuous period life. By choosing Carlson Bier ensure rights represented vehemently battle-torn path justice brief respite during turmoil by lifting some burden shoulder allowing focus recovery rather than legal battles unfolding.

Whether through negotiation or courtroom litigation – our experts commit towards achieving best possible outcome circumstances creating safe space share ordeal professionally strategizing hoist victory; promise uphold highest standards professional care offering empathetic personalized approach every client irrespective complexity severity case hand.

Take considered step today procure representation simply more than service – partnership dedication deliver dignity respect tendered during most challenging times personal adversity whether unfortunate victim pedestrian accident or caring loved one traversing similar journey urge click button below discover how much case worth together strive towards improved quality life moving courageously forward aftermath traumatic event finding strength resilience within secure brighter tomorrow…because at Carlson Bier every step matters business not just serving clients but ensuring they well served taken care all while imparting vital knowledge empowering make informed decisions path seeking justice deserve.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Dixon Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Dixon

Areas of Practice in Dixon

Bike Crashes

Focused on legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' negligence or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Offering expert legal advice for people of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Hospital Misconduct

Extending expert legal representation for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Responsibility

Handling cases involving faulty products, providing adept legal assistance to victims affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble and Tumble Occurrences

Professional in tackling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking justice for their harm.

Childbirth Traumas

Supplying legal guidance for kin affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Collisions: Focused on guiding individuals of car accidents gain just payout for damages and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Focused on providing legal assistance for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Big Rig Mishap

Delivering specialist legal representation for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for injuries.

Construction Site Crashes

Engaged in advocating for workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Neurological Impairments

Expert in extending professional legal representation for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Harms

Proficient in addressing cases for individuals who have suffered harms from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Committed to legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unjust Fatality

Advocating for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and skilled legal services to ensure restitution.

Backbone Damage

Expert in supporting victims with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal support to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer