FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Dongola

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the unfortunate event of a dog bite incident in Dongola, Carlson Bier, an esteemed attorney group specializing in personal injury cases and known for unrelenting pursuit of justice, should be your first choice. This prominent law firm has demonstrated its invaluable expertise specifically in navigating intricate Dog Bite Injuries lawsuits. The commitment to acting in the client’s best interest sets them apart from others. Furthering their approach with a blend of compassion during your trying times and aggressive representation against liable parties guarantees that you get due respect and empathy along with tough legal action. In essence, when dealing with Dog Bite Injuries , which often involve complex layers requiring detailed litigation knowledge grounded on Illinois state laws, it is imperative to choose a reliable advocate like Carlson Bier. This dedicated law firm can play an instrumental role ensuring you receive just compensation for ensuing physical harm or emotional distress resulting from any calamitous canine encounters.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Dongola Illinois

At Carlson Bier, a renowned Illinois-based law firm, we specialize in diverse fields of personal injury law and one of them is dog bite injuries. Having an in-depth understanding of all facets that surround this area, our team stands as a pillar of hope for those left physically and psychologically traumatized due to menacing canine encounters.

When you or your loved ones become victims of such unforeseen incidents, it can turn your world upside down, causing unimaginable agony and distress. The impact goes beyond physical harm; emotional trauma often accompanies the ordeal as well. In Illinois state law recognizes these complexities and seeks to offer legal reprieve through established regulations under the Animal Control Act which enshrines most provisions regarding dog bite injuries.

• Firstly, Illinois operates under the statute ‘strict liability’, this implies that if a dog injures another person without provocation while they were peacefully conducting themselves anywhere legally permissible then default responsibility lands on the dog owner.

• It’s crucial also to understand that not only bites qualify for compensation but any harm caused by dogs e.g., scratches or knockdowns leading to fractures.

• Importantly too is comprehending ‘Comparative Negligence’ where section 5/2-1116 applies. Under certain circumstances where both parties share some blame then damage rewards can be lessened according to degree fault contribution.

With regards to compensation, Illinois avails various subcategories one can pursue after acquiring significant proof:

1) Medical bills

2) Psychological counseling costs

3) Loss wages

4) Property damaged during encounter

Remember however that all claims following a dog bite should transpire within two years from occurrence date otherwise deemed invalid per Section 5/13-202 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

There’s no one-size-fits-all answer when speculating how much case value ultimately pans out since several dynamics dictate end result including severity and permanency injury sustained plus future consequences like potential medical procedures or therapeutics.

In spite of these intricacies surrounding dog bite injuries, our central mission at Carlson Bier is to demystify the process for you. We assure transparent and comprehensive attorney-client engagement throughout our dealings. Our highly skilled team ascertains that all your queries are aptly addressed, planned actions elaborated on clearly and potential legal penalties or opportunities promptly delivered in a comprehensible manner.

At Carlson Bier, your fight becomes ours too – compensations battles do not have to be solitary journeys skimmed with uncertainty and fear. Step onto grounds of assurance having us by your side through taxing times right up to rewarding victories.

For any immediate assistance or inquiries regarding dog bite cases and their intricate collectives, feel free to reach out to us anytime; we’re here to serve you diligently. Your journey towards complete healing pivots around assertive recuperation– both physical and financial- allowing you the serenity necessary for proper recovery mode without added pain from overdue bills stacking up against strained income sources owing from sudden work absence due to injury downtime.

On this note, let’s discover together what genuine relief feels like navigating the complicated world of personal injury law suitably equipped and guided by seasoned expertise trustfully accumulated over many successful years serving similar victims now finding their deserved justice within Illinois courts jurisdiction.

Taking one step further towards closure is as simple as clicking on the button below that would give an estimated valuation signalizing a winning start placing you way ahead in claiming rightful compensation owed in restitution for torment suffered unjustifiably.

When walking with Carlson Bier; rest assured victory isn’t just pursued relentlessly but won exceptionally well above average standard conventions! Don’t struggle alone anymore –Let’s win this together!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Dongola Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Dongola

Areas of Practice in Dongola

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Specializing in legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Burns

Supplying professional legal support for people of serious burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Hospital Misconduct

Extending expert legal services for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Liability

Taking on cases involving problematic products, offering expert legal support to customers affected by faulty goods.

Aged Neglect

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble and Stumble Accidents

Professional in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to persons seeking restitution for their losses.

Birth Injuries

Extending legal aid for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Incidents: Committed to supporting victims of car accidents secure equitable recompense for wounds and impairment.

Bike Crashes

Specializing in providing representation for motorcyclists involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

Truck Crash

Offering adept legal services for persons involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing fair recompense for hurts.

Worksite Crashes

Concentrated on assisting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Head Damages

Committed to extending specialized legal services for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Harms

Skilled in addressing cases for victims who have suffered damages from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Accidents

Focused on legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Unjust Fatality

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and experienced legal support to ensure redress.

Spine Injury

Focused on advocating for clients with paralysis, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​