...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Downs

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the repercussions of a dog bite injury, having the right team by your side can make all the difference. Carlson Bier, accomplished Personal Injury Lawyers in Illinois, focus on ensuring that victims of these traumatic incidents do not bear their burden alone. Specializing in Dog Bite Injuries, our expert attorneys understand these cases involve unique complexities and emotional distress they inherently carry; thus we consistently strive to alleviate any strain throughout this process. We respect that every case is personal and requires meticulous attention to detail which defines our legal approach at Carlson Bier making us stand out among other firms getting you the justice you deserve promptly and efficiently across Illinois including Downs. Our firm’s dedication to your physical recovery as well as financial recuperation offers comprehensive assistance for every client. With a reputation built upon trustworthiness and excellence coupled with understanding intricacies revolving around local legal statutes places us among top recommended considerations when seeking representation for dog bite injuries irrespective of where it occurred within Illinois state lines.Rooted in commitment.. cruising through challenges.. choose Carlson Bier—Promising professional support without borders!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Downs Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are not just personal injury attorneys. We’re advocates for justice, safety, and accountability. We understand how severely an unexpected incident like a dog bite can impact your life, causing both physical harm and emotional trauma. Dog bites might seem trivial to some but these injuries often result in extensive medical treatment, long-term disability or even disfigurement.

When you become a victim of a dog attack, the law provides various avenues for compensation and it’s important to be informed about them. Understanding key aspects surrounding this legal landscapes empowers you as you navigate towards justice:

• Illinois Dog Bite Law: Under Section 16 of the Animal Control Act of Illinois statute (510 ILCS 5/), the owner or keeper of any animal is liable if their pet attacks or injures another person without provocation. The injured party must only demonstrate they were behaving peaceably and had lawful right to be where the attack occurred.

• Scope Of A Claim: Legal damages that may be claimed include past and future related medical expenses such as plastic surgeries and psychological treatments; wage loss due to inability to work during recovery; non-economic damages including pain, suffering, mental distress; punitive damages in cases where owners deliberately ignored risk associated with their pet’s behavior.

• Timeframe For Action: Keep in mind that under the Illinois Statute of Limitations for Personal Injury Cases (735 ILCS 5/13-202), there is a two-year time limit to initiate legal action from the date when an injury was inflicted.

Embarking on a path towards justice in dog bite incidents requires making complex decisions fraught with technicalities – all while dealing with physical pain along with devastating effects it has on your daily routine.

Therein lies our mission at Carlson Bier – smoothing out this journey for you through compassionate service married with powerful representation underpinned by deep-seated knowledge specific laws governing injury claims in our beautiful state of Illinois. We thrive on prioritizing your requirements, valuing the trust you place in us above all else – remaining meticulously detail-oriented when building your case and relentlessly persistent about obtaining the rightful compensation you deserve.

Now that you know a bit more about Carlson Bier, Illinois’s dog bite law and what a claim may encompass – remember, this is just an outline. Each case is unique possessing its own complexities and details requiring a skilled examination. Let our team customize an effective legal approach for your specific circumstances. Allow us to comb through every thread of evidence, leverage applicable laws with precision, craft compelling narratives backed by proof and advocate fiercely for justice throughout every stage in your lawsuit.

The journey from being victim to victorious doesn’t have to be one navigated alone: as much as we are fighters in courtrooms passionately arguing cases; we are here for you with empathy and understanding listening carefully whenever you need us.

By clicking the button below now, let us help estimate how much your case could potentially be worth. From physical injuries to psychological scars – no element will be overlooked while calculating an estimated value particularly because our focus remains firmly anchored on representing not merely attorney clients but lives forever changed needing advocacy articulated with infinite care. At Carlson Bier: Justice begins here!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Downs Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Downs

Areas of Practice in Downs

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Expert in legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or hazardous conditions.

Flame Injuries

Extending specialist legal support for people of intense burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Medical Negligence

Offering specialist legal services for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, supplying expert legal services to customers affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Neglect

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble & Tumble Injuries

Professional in managing trip accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking justice for their losses.

Birth Damages

Offering legal assistance for kin affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Car Accidents

Incidents: Concentrated on guiding victims of car accidents obtain just remuneration for injuries and harm.

Motorcycle Incidents

Focused on providing legal assistance for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring just recovery for harm.

Big Rig Mishap

Offering experienced legal representation for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for harms.

Building Collisions

Dedicated to advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Brain Impairments

Focused on providing specialized legal assistance for persons suffering from neurological injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Wounds

Proficient in dealing with cases for persons who have suffered harms from canine attacks or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Crashes

Specializing in legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Unjust Passing

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and adept legal representation to ensure fairness.

Spine Harm

Expert in assisting individuals with spinal cord injuries, offering professional legal support to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​