...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Du Quoin

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re a victim of dog bite injuries within Du Quoin, Carlson Bier law firm is your compelling resource. We have vast litigation experience in vicious animal attacks and profoundly understand Illinois’ stringent laws relevant to this issue. As skilled personal injury attorneys, we assertively advocate for clients hurt by irresponsible pet owners or handlers. Excellence defines our service as we pursue maximum compensation while easing the overwhelming stress that comes with such situations. Our committed team delves into comprehensive investigations ensuring every fact supports your claims efficiently. Confused about the legal path post-incident? Worry not, our experts at Carlson Bier proactively clarify every detail ranging from immediately essential medical care to long-term treatment costs considerations proving accountable party’s negligence for optimized settlements outcome. Choosing us translates it into benefitting from our constant accessibility accompanied by cordial guidance through all processes till resolution arrives—unmatchable dedication exclusively dedicated to prioritizing your rights and restoring normalcy swiftly after suffering traumatic canine injuries inside Du Quoin.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Du Quoin Illinois

In the bustling state of Illinois, where many individuals live cheek by jowl with their loveable pets, dog bite injuries sadly abound. We at Carlson Bier are well-versed in this aspect of personal injury law and strive to help victims navigate the legal process for obtaining compensation. Dog bites can lead to severe physical harm such as puncture wounds, nerve damage, scars, or fractured bones. Putting yourself back together after a traumatic episode not only entails medical attention but legal recourse as well.

Familiarizing yourself with Illinois’s dog bite laws is an integral part of your claim making process. Should you be unaware, let it be known that The Land of Lincoln follows a strict liability when it comes to animal attacks— meaning owners are held responsible irrespective of whether their pet has no previous record of aggression or not.

Understanding your rights begins with identifying key facts about dog bite claims:

• Owners’ Liability: For any injury caused by their domesticated animal, the owner is held liable under Illinois law.

• One Bite Rule Does Not Apply: Unlike other states, Illinois does not apply the “one-bite rule.” Consequently, you may file a claim even if it was the first instance that an otherwise docile animal attacked someone.

• Proving Negligence Is Not Required: As per Illinois statute 510 ILCS 5/16 (515/505), demonstrating neglect on part of the owner isn’t essential for proving liability.

A successful personal injury lawsuit post-dog attack necessitates certain elements:

• You did not provoke the dog.

• The incident transpired in a place where you were legally permitted to be – public property or while lawfully on private property.

Your dealings with these aspects require acute professionalism and diligence which Carlson Bier brings into every case.

As specialists in personal injury litigation pertaining to canine assaults and associated incidents within the beautiful state of Illinois, our core objective remains committed towards delivering full-fledged legal support to victims. Our well-equipped staff ensure that your claim, case processes, required documentation, negotiations with insurance companies, or even a court appearance if necessary are effectively dealt with.

Recovery is not just physical; it is also financial and emotional. The devastating effects of dog bites often go beyond injuries — there’s lost income due to missed workdays, medical bills for treatment and surgeries in extreme cases (sometimes including psychological counseling), residual anxiety around dogs and the general trauma associated with the ordeal. You don’t need to shoulder these burdens alone; at Carlson Bier we understand what you’re going through and are eager to offer our aid.

One thing worth noting about hiring us is clarity. We rely on a contingency fee structure which means you owe us nothing unless we win the lawsuit or settle successfully out-of-court on your behalf. With no hidden fees or surprises, choose Carlson Bier for assured transparency throughout your personal injury claim process.

In conjunction with compassionately catering to injured individuals, we strive towards educating clients like you about their rights as per Illinois law – offering detailed consultations that actually clarify rather than confuse. At Carlson Bier, our team believes firmly that informed decisions lead to better outcomes.

Navigating the aftermath of a traumatic dog bite incident can be overwhelming but remember this: In times of adversity lies opportunity – an opportunity herein put forth by Carlson Bier? Why wait then? Better consult one today!

Are not all Personal Injury Lawyers created equal? Confused over selecting the right representation?

Without further ado, click on the button below! Discover more about how much compensation you could be entitled to receive for suffering caused by such an unfortunate incident. Don’t let uncertainty dampen your spirits— seek justice diligently while marking the end of distressing days caused due to a regretful encounter with man’s best friend turned foe. Trust Carlson Bier on your journey towards recovery and rightful recompense.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Du Quoin Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Du Quoin

Areas of Practice in Du Quoin

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or perilous conditions.

Burn Traumas

Providing expert legal support for victims of major burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Clinical Carelessness

Providing experienced legal representation for clients affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Fault

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, offering professional legal assistance to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Neglect

Defending the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble & Fall Injuries

Skilled in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal services to victims seeking justice for their injuries.

Neonatal Wounds

Delivering legal aid for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Collisions: Dedicated to guiding individuals of car accidents receive just recompense for injuries and losses.

Motorcycle Collisions

Expert in providing legal assistance for bikers involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for harm.

Semi Collision

Offering expert legal services for drivers involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for damages.

Building Site Mishaps

Committed to representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Head Damages

Focused on providing dedicated legal services for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Injuries

Skilled in tackling cases for people who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Accidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Demise

Working for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and experienced legal assistance to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Injury

Committed to defending persons with paralysis, offering professional legal services to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​