FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Du Quoin

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with a pedestrian accident in Du Quoin, trusting Carlson Bier can make all the difference. Our expertise as personal injury lawyers distinguishes us within Illinois and beyond. Having litigated various pedestrian accident cases, we understand the nuances of these matters thoroughly and guide our clients effectively through legal proceedings. We know that each case presents unique challenges; therefore, we believe in devising case-specific strategies to ensure success. Our approach involves meticulous investigation coupled with astute application of legal principles based on our extensive experience and knowledge base.

Carlson Bier’s proficiency in handling pedestrian accidents ensures you receive optimal compensation for your losses – be it medical expenditure or emotional trauma from such an unfortunate incident. Remember: no results with justice denied is a mantra we steadfastly believe at Carlson Bier! Trust our expert team now to represent your best interests during this trying time – an assurance that help from those who genuinely care is available just when you need it most—an advantage only possible with Carlson Bier.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Du Quoin Illinois

Carlson Bier is a prominent Illinois-based law firm specializing in personal injury cases, with particular expertise and success in Pedestrian Accident cases. We understand the physical, emotional, and financial implications of being an unfortunate victim of such an accident. Our highly skilled attorneys are steadfastly devoted to equipping you with comprehensive legal support while ensuring your rights remain secure and uncompromised.

When accidents occur at pedestrian zones or crosswalks due to reckless driving, drunk driving, speeding or traffic violations, the resulting injuries can vary from minor to severe. These may include fractures, spinal cord or brain injuries often leading to pile up medical bills and significant wage loss during recovery period. In worst-case scenarios, these accidents can tragically result in fatalities too.

For those impacted by pedestrian accidents, understanding how liability is determined becomes crucial for seeking justice. Liability involves identifying who was at fault – either partially or wholly. Factors considered here include pedestrian behavior such as jaywalking; driver’s conduct like ignoring speed limits; malfunctioning traffic signals or even improperly designed crosswalks.

Further points highlighting our zeal toward representing pedestrian accident victims:

• Our competent team diligently investigates every aspect of the case – retrieving surveillance footages when available; examining police reports in microscopic detail; interviewing any potential witnesses.

• Working closely with medical practitioners allows us to thoroughly understand prognosis ensuing from injuries which assists immensely during claim settlements.

• Reconstructing the accident scene using state-of-the-art technology often results in uncovering critical evidence.

• Comprehending insurance policies enables us to maximize pertinent coverage benefits helping significantly reduce out-of-pocket expenses

.• High negotiation acuity allows us to get maximum possible compensation for our clients’ damages that serves beyond just covering initial medical bills further including loss wages and psychological trauma management.

At Carlson Bier we believe complete information forms the groundwork for well-informed decisions relying upon a sound awareness about your legal rights along with responsibilities ascertaining the criticality of understanding regulations in place within Illinois state. In scenarios where a pedestrian disregards traffic rules and accidents occur, comparative negligence would be applied confirming that both motorist’s and pedestrian’s actions had contributed to the accident effecting compensation amounts one can recover.

By entrusting us with your case, you can rest easy knowing our legal expertise is diligently at work doing everything possible to bring about a successful resolution – assisting you through every step from filing for damage recovery till achieving it while proactively keeping you informed throughout this process. Our compassionate approach ensures personalized attention while we ardently strive for securing maximum remuneration covering medical bills, wage loss during recovery and other suffered damages.

We steadfastly work on contingency fees basis meaning until absolute success in securement of your rightful compensation no attorney’s fee gets payable affirming our firm commitment towards winning your due justice. With Carlson Bier at forefront providing indispensable legal counsel pertinent to your specific circumstances, you are never alone in navigating these juridical complexities freeing crucial bandwidth enabling complete focus upon recovering without worrying about financial consequences.

Comprehensive knowledge of personal injury law combined with an extensive history getting exceptional results across hundreds cases differentiates us as leading attorneys within Illinois. So don’t shoulder these significant burdens by yourself, partner with us today ensuring that none exploiting any uninsured or under insured loopholes leaving you out-of-pocket financially drained but rather unmask most compelling arguments using effective litigation strategies bolstered up against responsible parties holding them duly accountable for their reckless actions potentially saving countless others falling victim to similar misfortunes.

To understand how much your unique claim maybe worth click on the button below that will transition positively setup journey toward regaining life back transforming adverse experiences into robust resolutions – for life often tests resilience before blessing resurgence making us stronger than yesterday; everyday.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Du Quoin Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Du Quoin

Areas of Practice in Du Quoin

Bike Accidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or risky conditions.

Fire Injuries

Extending professional legal services for people of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or negligence.

Clinical Misconduct

Delivering professional legal services for victims affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Liability

Managing cases involving faulty products, supplying skilled legal guidance to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Mistreatment

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip and Tumble Accidents

Adept in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking restitution for their harm.

Childbirth Harms

Supplying legal help for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Incidents

Accidents: Committed to helping sufferers of car accidents gain appropriate remuneration for damages and damages.

Motorbike Accidents

Focused on providing legal services for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for harm.

Trucking Accident

Providing specialist legal representation for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for hurts.

Construction Collisions

Engaged in advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Brain Damages

Dedicated to offering dedicated legal representation for persons suffering from brain injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Injuries

Expertise in tackling cases for individuals who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Focused on legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering compensation.

Unfair Loss

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and professional legal assistance to ensure compensation.

Spine Harm

Expert in representing victims with paralysis, offering specialized legal guidance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​