FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Du Quoin

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with life-altering spinal cord injuries, having the right advocate to uphold your legal rights in Du Quoin can make a crucial difference. Carlson Bier, an esteemed personal injury law firm based in Illinois, is perfectly equipped to ensure you or your loved one’s case receives the robust defense it deserves. Masterful litigators and versatile negotiators alike are devoted at our firm to providing compassionate representation for victims of spinal cord injuries; heartfelt advocacy shaped by expert knowledge and solid experience. With an profound understanding of Illinois state laws as they pertain to these intricate cases, every attorney within Carlson Bier consistently delivers results that surpass client expectations – across geographical boundaries and beyond city lines. Choosing us translates into electing relentless pursuit of justice sprinkled generously with professional dignity and respect essential for such sensitive situations. Ensuring recovery from potential financial burdens accompanying devastating circumstances like Spinal Cord Injuries is why we consider ourselves not just attorneys but also partners in helping reclaim lives left shattered post-incident.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Du Quoin Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we’re not just attorneys—we’re advocates for individuals who have suffered spinal cord injuries throughout the state of Illinois. Spinal Cord Injuries (SCIs) are devastating traumas with profound implications on both physical and emotional wellness. Despite their grave impact, understanding their causes and consequences contributes to better treatment efforts and preventative measures.

There’s a multitude of reasons one may sustain damage to their spinal cord. Potentially caused by accidents from car crashes, slip and falls, or construction site mishaps; these incidents often stem from someone else’s negligence or recklessness. Medical malpractice also plays a significant role: surgical errors or delayed diagnosis can exacerbate an existing condition, leading to severe spine-related complications.

Given the central nervous system’s vital connection with the human spine, any damage to this crucial part not only affects mobility but bodily functions as well. Symptoms might vary greatly in scope and severity—ranging from minor symptoms such as pain or discomfort at the injury site to more severe manifestations like total paralysis of limbs (quadriplegia), limited lower body movement (paraplegia), respiratory issues, bladder control problems, sexual dysfunction among others.

Moreover, living with a spinal cord injury goes beyond adjusting physically; its psychological toll is undeniably immense as well. As experienced personal injury attorneys, we are sensitive to this dual impact—an essential perspective when seeking fair compensation outcomes for our clients.

• Primary financial burdens include medical expenses––hospital stays, surgeries & therapy.

• Long-term costs encompass home modification needs ––like installing wheelchair ramps.

• Loss of earnings capacity due to inability to work should be factored into any claim.

• Non-economic damages represent loss of life quality ––emotional distress & diminished enjoyment in life activities resulting from adjustments forced upon by sustained SCIs.

But here at Carlson Bier, we affirm that no one should bear these overwhelming burdens alone without appropriate recompense. As your trusted legal ally, we stand by you every step of the way. Our commitment goes beyond fighting for a fair settlement—it’s about ensuring that our clients understand their rights and options while providing compassionate counsel throughout.

Legal claims following an SCI often involve complex medical and legal principles—a team adept in the nuances of Illinois law is vital in building a persuasive case. At Carlson Bier, our expertise extends to years of handling spinal cord injury cases, allowing us to strategize the best course of action specific to each client.

We strongly believe knowledge empowers; thus, we prioritize educating our clients on their situation—understanding their claim’s worth and how different variables might affect it. Through seamless communication and collaboration, we counter litigation hurdles together—bringing due justice closer to reach.

Time is crucial when advancing a personal injury case—the earlier you engage with us at Carlson Bier; the better positioned you’ll be in securing essential documentations & laying out timely strategies. It’s our avowed mission to achieve justice for those wronged needlessly open up doors towards appropriate aftercare—and ultimately a recovered life beyond rehabilitation.

Concerned about attorney fees? Rest assured we embrace the contingency fee system—you merely owe us if we win your case! Eliminating upfront costs means lifting one worry off your shoulders—you can channel your energy into recuperation efforts rather than financial concerns.

Navigating through post-SCI experience can be overwhelming—but remember: You don’t have to face these challenges alone. Let us carry some weight off your shoulders—we’re here ready to serve as your capable advocate amidst adversity.

Curious about potential compensation? Take decisive action today! Click on the button below—to discover what damages might be recoverable from your spinal cord injury claim alongside dedicated professionals from Carlson Bier committed t relentlessly fight for your interests. Shift from uncertainty towards clarity—even amidst tough times: With Carlson Bier by your side! Because everyone deserves access to fair and just compensation.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Du Quoin Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Du Quoin

Areas of Practice in Du Quoin

Cycling Collisions

Focused on legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or dangerous conditions.

Flame Burns

Extending specialist legal assistance for victims of major burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Physician Misconduct

Ensuring professional legal support for persons affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Liability

Addressing cases involving defective products, extending specialist legal assistance to customers affected by defective items.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble and Fall Mishaps

Professional in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking compensation for their damages.

Neonatal Wounds

Extending legal guidance for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Crashes: Focused on assisting victims of car accidents gain fair payout for injuries and losses.

Scooter Collisions

Focused on providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Big Rig Collision

Ensuring adept legal assistance for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for injuries.

Building Site Collisions

Focused on defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Brain Damages

Expert in delivering expert legal advice for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Traumas

Specialized in handling cases for victims who have suffered damages from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Incidents

Focused on legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Undeserved Fatality

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and professional legal support to ensure restitution.

Neural Impairment

Dedicated to representing clients with spine impairments, offering professional legal representation to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​