FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Dunlap

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one has suffered from dog bite injuries in Dunlap, seeking legal representation is essential and the Carlson Bier law firm offers impeccable service. Our group of experienced personal injury lawyers specialize in dog bite cases, ensuring that victims receive their due compensation for medical bills, pain and suffering. Over the years, we have garnered an exceptional track record of successful outcomes which makes us unmatched when it comes to handling such complex claims. The nuances surrounding Illinois’ Dog Bite Statute are well-understood by our dedicated team who put their best foot forward to make certain justice prevails. Every case dealt with at Carlson Bier is given personalized attention; your rights will be prioritized and protected diligently throughout the legal process. At no point should your peace of mind suffer undue strain due to negligence on part of an irresponsible pet owner — trust on Carlson Bier’s impressive expertise as leaders navigating through these challenging waters effectively within strict accordance to Illinois laws.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Dunlap Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that suffering a dog bite injury can be both physically and emotionally traumatic. As a distinguished personal Injury law firm based in Illinois, our specialized team of attorneys is devoted to assisting victims of such incidents in obtaining the compensation they rightly deserve. Our legal experts leverage their deep understanding of Illinois law, coupled with extensive experience litigating dog bite cases, to guide you through this daunting process.

Dog bites can lead to severe injuries which include but are not limited to puncture wounds, nerve damage, facial scarring or even psychological harm. Unknown to many, repercussions from these injuries often extend beyond immediate physical pain; loss of earnings from inability to work during recovery period and high medical bills for treatment tend to burden victims financially. Hence it’s crucial that victims fully comprehend the depth involved in these cases and know their rights under Illinois Law.

To assist in your understanding:

• Illinois’ Animal Control Act states that if a dog or other animal attacks or injures someone without provocation while out of its property boundaries, the owner is held liable for damages suffered by the victim.

• Liability falls on shoulders of the pet’s owner regardless whether his/her pet had history of aggression or totally never attacked anyone before.

• Irrespective if an attack occurs on public property or private property (provided victim is legally allowed) – Owner liability stands strong.

Thus ensuring all encompassing protection under this comprehensive legislation.

Additionally important is seeking appropriate legal aid as soon as possible post incident. Due process requires thorough investigation including collection & preservation of evidence – like witness testimonies, photographs – crucial for building a solid case which is no small task given emotional hardship endured post-incident.

Here at Carlson Bier, we pride ourselves in providing our clients attentive tailored service thus making recounting your ordeal less distressing whilst maximizing your claim potential; bringing us one step closer to justice served! We give meticulous attention into understanding every facet of the case – from empathizing with emotional stress; comprehending physical pain/hardships endured to calculating future financial stresses our clients might face due to said incident.

Remember, you have a right under law to claim compensation not only for medical expenses but also any physical & psychological stress, loss of earnings or potential future earnings. Should tragedy befall where such unfortunate event results in fatality – surviving kin do have an equal right pursuing compensation for pecuniary losses alongside tender sympathies.

It’s essential you feel comfortable and confident about your legal representation while battling these challenging circumstances. At Carlson Bier, through dedicated Client-Attorney Relationship we strive ensuring exactly that. Navigating complexities of Dog Bite Injury Law coupled with negotiating claims against powerful insurance corporations requires well seasoned attorneys who are both compassionate & aggressive fighters when it comes representing your best interests.

Finally please note that despite misconceptions – Being bitten by dog outside of one’s home doesn’t automatically mean owner has no liability! Illinois’ One-Bite Rule doesn’t generalize all scenes rather each case is evaluated thoroughly on its own feet.

In conclusion, if you’ve been affected with a dog bite incidents in Illinois remember: Help at Carlson Bier is just a click away! Let our team of experts navigate nuances pivotal towards debunking myths associated whilst holding guilty parties accountable leading eventually towards effective monetary restitution making ordeal less strenuous overall.

Finding strength post-trauma can seem daunting however know that there’s always dependable assistance available; We at Carlson Bier hope to make journey lighter understanding the sheer fact that restitution goes beyond mere remuneration; enabling closure and justice onto traumatic chapter life threw unexpectedly at you!

Stand tall knowing rights sheathed within palms ready combat stepping ahead fearlessly! Just take step courageously clicking button below discover true worth camouflaged amidst adversities painted black helping unfurl canvas smeared hues resilience ultimately resultant fruition deservedly yours by law.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Dunlap Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Dunlap

Areas of Practice in Dunlap

Bicycle Accidents

Proficient in legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Fire Wounds

Extending adept legal help for patients of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Hospital Negligence

Ensuring dedicated legal services for patients affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Obligation

Handling cases involving dangerous products, extending professional legal support to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Neglect

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble & Slip Incidents

Adept in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking recovery for their suffering.

Birth Damages

Providing legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Car Mishaps

Accidents: Devoted to assisting sufferers of car accidents receive fair compensation for damages and damages.

Scooter Crashes

Focused on providing legal assistance for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

18-Wheeler Accident

Extending specialist legal support for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for harms.

Construction Incidents

Engaged in defending employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Cognitive Impairments

Expert in delivering compassionate legal assistance for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Injuries

Expertise in addressing cases for persons who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Accidents

Specializing in legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Fatality

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and expert legal guidance to ensure redress.

Backbone Damage

Specializing in assisting individuals with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440