...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Dupo

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Have you suffered a dog bite injury in Dupo? Carlson Bier are the experts when it comes to handling dog bite cases, boasting years of experience and understanding that sets us apart. Navigating through personal injury law can be complex; however, our dedicated team ensures dealing with your case is smooth and straightforward. We understand every situation is unique – we offer tailored legal strategies to maximize the compensation you receive. Our competent attorneys remain updated on Illinois state statutes governing these specific types of injuries so they provide impeccable representation focused on results for each client. Dog bites may seem ordinary but can cause severe emotional distress, financial burden, physical discomfort and even loss of employment due to recovery time off work. Let us alleviate your stress by providing top-tier legal services aimed at enhancing your peace of mind while fighting for justice on your behalf. Choose Carlson Bier for reliable legal representation in matters concerning dog bite injuries – because we believe that no one should suffer from someone else’s negligence.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Dupo Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your advocate in times of personal strife arising from dog bite injuries. Based out of Illinois, we are a team of dedicated personal injury attorneys committed to helping our clients navigate their way through the significant legal and medical challenges associated with such offenses.

Dog bites can have serious ramifications beyond the initial injury. They might lead to severe infections, nerve damage, significant blood loss, post-traumatic stress disorder or even death in extreme cases. In tandem with these health consequences come skyrocketing medical bills and potential lost wages due to recovery time.

Our extensive understanding of Indiana’s Dog Bite Law gives us a distinctive edge while representing you. The law primarily follows the “one bite” rule that holds the owner liable if they had reason to believe their dog posed danger, whether this was because it had attacked before or shown aggressive tendencies.

It is imperative for you as a potential claimant to be aware of certain key points:

• Owners are strictly liable for dog attacks occurring when their pets are off-leash outside their property.

• Landlords may also be held responsible if a tenant’s dog bites someone

• Statutory limitation specifies formal actions must begin within two years from the date of injury.

Our seasoned lawyers at Carlson Bier take on these complex litigations headfirst. We engage in meticulous case analysis and employ decisive arguments with proof obtained through thorough investigations.

Apart from constructing an infallible case strategy around state laws and elements surrounding negligence or liability; providing emotional support and empathetic counsel hold equal significance toward our pursuit for justice on your behalf. We aim not only towards securing rightful compensation but also delivering peace of mind amidst adversity.

Victims must never feel burdened by accountability in dog attack incidents; perpetrators need to face responsibility proportionate extent to damage inflicted by their canine. This forms the cornerstone philosophy toward every undertaking here at Carlson Bier.

Spearheaded by professionals carrying commendable credentials showcasing decades of combined legal experience, our firm operates on the very values embedded into its foundation – fairness, transparency, dedication and competence. We strive to translate these principles into tangible outcomes for clients who choose to entrust us amidst severe physical and mental trauma following grievous dog bite incidents.

Injury cases are never straightforward, and each situation requires tailored treatment. Determining the exact value of your claim involves careful evaluation of numerous variable factors such as medical expenses, lost wages, future earnings potential or even any punitive damages that may apply.

Turn toward Carlson Bier’s comprehensive counsel for a fair assessment abounding in expertise we have been accumulating over considerable periods fighting tooth and nail for victims just like you.

Do not leave it too late; let our specialized team lend assured guidance throughout this challenging journey with unyielding perseverance. You possess a legitimate right towards solid representation under circumstances preying upon vulnerability – one that we passionately uphold alongside uncompromising regard for justice served.

We invite you to take the next step toward claiming what is rightfully yours by browsing further into our website’s various resources dedicated solely to equip you better against at-fault parties refusing due recompense.

Extend toward an ally equipped with ample knowledge about dog bite injury claims within Illinois’ jurisdiction—a law firm exceeding traditional client expectations marking profound success through years nurturance devotion paired adequately nuanced legal insight—Carlson Bier.

To find out more about how much your case could potentially be worth whilst gaining invaluable clarity backdropped by unpretentious interaction resonating genuine concern throughout professional disposition exhibited from every staff member at Carlson Bier, click on the button below now. Your fight becomes ours well before initiating formal court proceedings until eventual closure enriches your life with deserved peace-of-mind replacing stress endured hitherto—the Carlson Bier promise!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Dupo Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Dupo

Areas of Practice in Dupo

Bicycle Accidents

Focused on legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Flame Injuries

Offering adept legal services for victims of major burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Medical Malpractice

Ensuring specialist legal assistance for victims affected by physician malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Obligation

Handling cases involving problematic products, supplying professional legal guidance to victims affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Neglect

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble & Slip Injuries

Expert in managing trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking restitution for their damages.

Birth Wounds

Delivering legal support for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Incidents: Committed to supporting individuals of car accidents gain equitable compensation for hurts and damages.

Scooter Incidents

Focused on providing legal advice for bikers involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

Big Rig Mishap

Providing experienced legal representation for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for injuries.

Construction Accidents

Focused on representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or recklessness.

Neurological Harms

Dedicated to providing expert legal services for victims suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Damages

Expertise in tackling cases for people who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Expert in legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Passing

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, offering sensitive and expert legal guidance to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Expert in representing individuals with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal assistance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​