Wrongful Death Attorney in Dupo

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing the pain of losing a loved one to a wrongful death, Dupo residents find solace and support in Carlson Bier. Our esteemed group of attorneys combine unparalleled legal acumen with an empathetic approach to navigate these heart-wrenching cases. At Carlson Bier, we understand that no financial compensation can fill the void left by a departed dear one. However, obtaining rightful justice becomes pivotal in ensuring closure for surviving family members while holding negligent parties accountable.

Our unmatched dedication towards our profession has helped us secure favorable judgments for countless grieving families who approached us after life-altering personal tragedies. We meticulously investigate each case’s nuances and provide tailored legal strategies based on unique circumstances surrounding every wrongful death lawsuit.

Choosing Carlson Bier reaffirms your faith in fairness within Illinois’ legal system – where achieving justice isn’t simply argued but ardently fought for! Our diligent preparation combined with resolute action makes us your premier choice in seeking justice during such trying times without ever compromising on compassion or understanding. Trust is not merely given; it’s earned – something that we believe wholeheartedly at Carlson Bier.

About Carlson Bier

Wrongful Death Lawyers in Dupo Illinois

Losing a loved one is a painful experience; more so when the death was preventable and caused by someone else’s negligence. Carlson Bier, an established personal injury attorney group in Illinois, understands your anguish under such circumstances and stands ready to assist you in seeking justice through wrongful death claims.

A wrongful death claim arises when an individual loses their life as a result of another person’s intentional action or negligence. Illinois law provides for the family members or representatives of the deceased’s estate to file this lawsuit seeking compensation for the emotional pain, loss of income contribution, funeral costs, medical bills related to final care among others.

Key considerations with Wrongful Death lawsuits include:

– Identifying responsible parties: Establishing liability can be complex involving multiple at-fault parties. Our experienced attorneys meticulously investigate every aspect ensuring all liable entities are held accountable.

– Proving causation: The burden of proof lies on the survivors making the claim hence proving that neglect led directly to the demise is crucial.

– Statute of limitations: In Illinois, a wrongful death lawsuit must be filed within two years date of loss unless specific exceptions apply.

Choosing Carlson Bier ensures sensitivity towards your grieving process along mustered fervor in fighting for your rights. We strive diligently preparing each case from consultation stage through trial if necessary maximizing mends for our clients while holding wrongdoers accountable for their actions.

Our legal support extends beyond mere courtroom presentations; it involves compassionate individualized service to each client understanding that no two cases nor individuals’ suffering can ever be alike. Through this approach, we have earned reputation as one of Illinois’ formidable personal injury attorney groups known frequently securing optimum settlements for individuals battling tragedy aftermaths.

Why choose us?

– Specialized Expertise: Byzantine nature associated wrongful deaths require experienced hands navigating seeming obstacles faced during building compelling lawsuits against negligent parties protecting victim families’ interests.

– No up-front fees: To alleviate further distress, Carlson Bier operates under a contingency fee basis implying we don’t get paid unless we win your case.

– Settlement negotiation skills: Our adept lawyers are experts in negotiating sizeable settlement amounts from insurance companies who often oppose clients’ rightful compensation offerings.

It’s essential to know that each case is unique; your experience will not be identical to that of others gaining large-sum settlements. At Carlson Bier, we measure success through real progress made towards restoring your life stability instead of focusing on promised dollar amounts that may or may not eventuate.

We invite you now to click below and receive an obligation-free evaluation by our experienced personal injury attorneys tailored specifically for your situation. Gaining a clear understanding about what potential worth could be associated with asserting wrongful death claim helps significantly during this trying time ensuring you can begin charting path forward after tragedy strikes. Trust in expertise exemplified by Carlson Bier – together let us seek justice and restoration bearing those unexpected lacerations thrown at you by fate unannounced.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Dupo Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Wrongful Death FAQ​

Wrongful death occurs when a person’s death is caused by the negligence or recklessness of another person.

The following people may be able to file a wrongful death lawsuit:

  • The spouse or children of the deceased
  • The parents of the deceased
  • The siblings of the deceased
  • The personal representative of the deceased’s estate

To prove a wrongful death claim in Illinois, the plaintiff must prove the following elements:

  • The defendant owed the deceased a duty of care.
  • The defendant breached that duty of care.
  • The breach of duty caused the death of the deceased.
  • The plaintiff suffered damages as a result of the death of the deceased.

In a wrongful death lawsuit in Illinois, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Pecuniary damages: These damages are designed to compensate the plaintiff for the financial losses they have suffered as a result of the death of the deceased. This could include lost wages, medical expenses, and funeral expenses.
  • Non-pecuniary damages: These damages are designed to compensate the plaintiff for the non-financial losses they have suffered as a result of the death of the deceased. This could include pain and suffering, loss of consortium, and loss of parental guidance.

The statute of limitations for wrongful death lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the death to file a lawsuit.

If you have any questions about your legal rights or options after a wrongful death, you should contact an experienced wrongful death attorney.

All Attorney Services in Dupo

Areas of Practice in Dupo

Bike Mishaps

Specializing in legal support for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or risky conditions.

Scald Wounds

Giving expert legal assistance for victims of serious burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Physician Misconduct

Providing dedicated legal advice for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Merchandise Responsibility

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, delivering professional legal assistance to individuals affected by defective items.

Geriatric Misconduct

Protecting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Fall and Stumble Occurrences

Professional in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking justice for their suffering.

Newborn Harms

Delivering legal guidance for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Mishaps

Mishaps: Concentrated on assisting clients of car accidents receive equitable settlement for damages and harm.

Scooter Accidents

Expert in providing legal support for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Semi Crash

Ensuring experienced legal assistance for persons involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for losses.

Worksite Crashes

Focused on assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Brain Harms

Specializing in providing specialized legal representation for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Damages

Adept at handling cases for people who have suffered traumas from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Specializing in legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Unfair Loss

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and experienced legal representation to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Focused on advocating for individuals with paralysis, offering professional legal assistance to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer