FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in East Dundee

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with Spinal Cord Injuries, having a committed and experienced legal team can be the turning point in your case. Carlson Bier has distinguished itself as a leading advocate in Illinois for those impacted by such injuries. Our reputation stems from our diligent pursuit of justice, unparalleled expertise, and compassionate approach to law practice. We understand that living with a spinal cord injury brings up emotional, financial,and medical challenges which is why we stand with you every step of the way through this complex journey offering reliable counsel based on an in-depth understanding of the subject matter related law practices.Our dedication extends to East Dundee residents who require top-notch representation for spinal cord injury claims.No distance too great,no situation too grueling;our scope reaches out to all corners without compromising our quality.We relentlessly fight for rightful compensation ensuring no stone is left unturned.Carlson Bier efficacy underscores one thing – entrust us,your significant matters will be expertly handled.Choose steadfast excellence.Choose equity.Make Carlson Bier your first consideration when it comes to Spinal Cord Injuries attorneys.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in East Dundee Illinois

As expert personal injury attorneys, we at Carlson Bier understand the life-changing impact a spinal cord injury can have on an individual. It is our commitment to guide you through the legal complexities involved in such delicate matters and shed light on some important facets of spinal cord injuries.

Spinal cord injuries occur when there’s damage to any part of the spinal cord or nerves attached to it, often resulting from accidents or falls that give jolts or cuts to the neck or back region. This traumatic event results not only in physical pain but also triggers financial strain and emotional distress.

A significant effect of these injuries is seen in the victim’s daily activities. Disruption of normal body functions, reduced mobility, loss of sensation, and even complete paralysis are amongst many debilitating problems faced by victims depending largely on where and how severe the damage is.

From a monetary perspective, medical expenses for initial treatment followed by ongoing care can put tremendous weight on your pockets. According to leading research institutes and healthcare organizations:

– Initial hospitalization costs post-injury alone may range between $150k – $480k.

– While average yearly expenses for patients with high tetraplegia could be over $180k

– Even with minor conditions like Incomplete Motor Function, the expenditure likely exceeds $40K annually.

Another striking factor associated with spinal cord damages is mental health risks; depression prevalence rates among injured individuals are reported significantly higher than general population rates.

Here at Carlson Bier, our role as personal injury attorneys goes beyond just lawyering because we grasp how devastating Spinal Cord Injuries can be for victims and their families alike. Navigating through insurance claims or lawsuits becomes all too complicated amidst these personal hardships they already endure. Hence, our skilled team strives to alleviate this additional legal burden off your shoulders doing what we do best – fighting tirelessly defending your rights to secure maximum compensation feasible under Illinois law so you can focus entirely on recovery

Moreover, we firmly believe in empowering our clients by giving them a clear understanding of Illinois’s legal landscape concerning spinal Cord Injuries. For instance:

– Under Illinois’ statute of limitations law, you must file a personal injury lawsuit within two years from the date of the accident.

– Illinois follows a comparative fault rule that may reduce or even deny compensation if you’re found to be partially at fault for your injuries.

At end of day, success isn’t merely about getting you just any settlement amount; instead, it’s about getting what your case is genuinely worth considering all facets of the impact this traumatic event has had and will continue to have on your life.

We hope this detailed overview gives our potential clients valuable insight into spinal cord injuries and related implicative aspects. At Carlson Bier, your needs remain above everything else as we symbolize compassion integrated with concrete action towards justice.

If the harsh reality of a spinal cord injury is something you or loved one are grappling with currently due to another party’s negligence, take advantage now of the expert services offered here at Carlson Bier. Don’t allow yourself to be overwhelmed by mounting medical expenses while shouldering an unbearable burden alone. Click on the button below and find out today how much your case could potentially stand to gain under Illinois law.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For East Dundee Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in East Dundee

Areas of Practice in East Dundee

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Expert in legal support for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or hazardous conditions.

Burn Injuries

Extending professional legal help for individuals of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Clinical Incompetence

Extending professional legal advice for victims affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Liability

Handling cases involving problematic products, delivering expert legal services to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip & Trip Injuries

Specialist in handling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to victims seeking restitution for their harm.

Birth Wounds

Delivering legal aid for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Car Collisions

Crashes: Focused on helping patients of car accidents obtain equitable compensation for harms and impairment.

Scooter Collisions

Committed to providing representation for motorcyclists involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Semi Accident

Delivering professional legal representation for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for hurts.

Building Site Mishaps

Concentrated on supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Brain Damages

Specializing in extending compassionate legal support for victims suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Traumas

Expertise in tackling cases for clients who have suffered injuries from dog bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Expert in legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Unfair Death

Working for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and experienced legal support to ensure redress.

Neural Harm

Focused on supporting patients with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal support to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​