...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in East Galesburg

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffered a dog bite injury in East Galesburg? At Carlson Bier, we understand the distress such injuries can inflict—not just physically, but emotionally and financially. Our respected team of personal injury attorneys specialize in Dog Bite Injuries and are exceptionally equipped to guide you through the processing maze, ensuring that justice is served. With extensive experience representing individuals who have suffered traumatic dog-related injuries in Illinois, our legal capabilities at Carlson Bier span beyond typical litigation sessions. We support victims by exploring all available avenues for compensation – medical bills reimbursement or dealing with long-term consequences of trauma introduced by unexpected incidents. Representing your interest resiliently until optimal resolution has been reached is our unequivocal commitment at Carlson Bier—your reputable ally whenever dog bite misfortunes arise. Rest assured, when choosing us as your legal partner for Stand-alone Dog-Bite Injury cases in Illinois—you’re not only investing resources; you’re entrusting precious peace-of-mind into able hands of well-versed professionals redefining customer-centric legal service standards.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in East Galesburg Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are committed to bringing justice to victims of personal injuries. As seasoned experts in this field, our core focus involves various types of situations where legal remedies and defenses are associated with wrongful conduct. Specifically, we have consistently pursued the best interests of individuals suffering from a sub-category of such personal mishaps, Dog Bite Injuries.

Dog bite injuries can lead to considerable trauma including physical incapacitation and psychological distress. According to the `Illinois Animal Control Act,’ a victim has a right to seek legal compensation for injuries caused by dogs if it can be proven that the dog attacked, injured or attempted injury without provocation while the victim was conducting themselves peacefully in an area they were lawfully entitled to be. Several important facets surround these types of cases:

• Under Illinois Law, dog owners are held strictly liable for any harm their pets cause.

• The state operates under ‘Strict Liability’ which means you do not have to prove negligence.

• There is no ‘One-Bite rule’ meaning victims do not have to establish knowledge about the aggression or dangerous nature of their pet.

• A range of damages like medical bills, disfigurement, disability among others may potentially be claimed.

At Carlson Bier we have a profound understanding of both statutory provisions and nuanced complications intrinsic to Dog Bite Injury cases. We diligently strive towards achieving appropriate reimbursement whether it pertains directly related expenses such as medical costs (including future projected treatments) or indirect damage experienced through emotional distress leading up-to and post-incident – aspects often undermined in valuation calculations.

We firmly advocate maintaining your rights irrespective of inherent complexities within these cases: loaded terms like ‘provocation’, ambiguity on private property claims or how liability distribution occurs when multiple parties are involved constitute areas where possessing strong legal representation becomes essential.

Having expert guidance on drafting detailed statements recounting incident specifics plus navigating murky grounds concerning comparative negligence reinforces victim stances especially when facing elaborate defense trajectories often adopted by opposing litigators representing pet owners.

Time-bound limitations (Statute of Limitations) require victims to file suits within a stipulated period post-incident. This period is generally two years but may be subject to specific conditions circling the incident specifics or victim’s age; another reason why expeditious consultation with skilled practitioners like us at Carlson Bier is recommended.

We recognize many readers might harbor apprehensions encircling affordability of legal services. Carlson Bier, however, operates on a Contingency basis – meaning we only get paid if you do! Such client-centric approach not only eases financial concerns but also reflects our true commitment towards aligning ourselves with victims’ interests above everything else.

Accumulating combined expertise and maintaining unwavering dedication in alleviating pain points associated with Dog Bite Injuries has positioned Client Bier as reliable professionals equipped to handle your case no matter its intricacy level. Our firm cherishes lasting client relationships developed through provision of deep technical competence laden with compassion and personalized attention.

The ordeal accompanying any incident of personal injury is indeed heart-wrenching and particularly disrupts life rhythms when meted out through an unexpected corner like one’s beloved pet canine. We hope this content has assisted you in understanding key aspects related to Dog Bite injuries & gave you insights about options available via robust appeal for justice mechanisms we offer at Carlson Bier.

If after reading this, you are wondering about worthiness of your potential dog bite case or seek closure through direct Q&A discussion with our proficient team members, click the button below. Take that vital step now towards vindicating yourself while ensuring such incidents can be mitigated in future which collectively contribute towards building safer neighborhoods for everyone residing in Illinois.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For East Galesburg Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in East Galesburg

Areas of Practice in East Galesburg

Bicycle Collisions

Focused on legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Giving professional legal assistance for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Healthcare Malpractice

Delivering specialist legal advice for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Obligation

Taking on cases involving defective products, delivering professional legal guidance to victims affected by defective items.

Elder Misconduct

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip and Fall Injuries

Skilled in managing stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to persons seeking recovery for their losses.

Infant Traumas

Extending legal aid for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Crashes

Incidents: Devoted to supporting clients of car accidents gain just settlement for damages and impairment.

Motorcycle Accidents

Specializing in providing representation for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Extending adept legal advice for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for harms.

Construction Mishaps

Engaged in defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Cerebral Damages

Specializing in providing dedicated legal advice for clients suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Harms

Adept at dealing with cases for people who have suffered injuries from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Jogger Incidents

Focused on legal support for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Wrongful Death

Advocating for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and experienced legal assistance to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Injury

Committed to advocating for individuals with paralysis, offering professional legal support to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​