FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in East Galesburg

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the trauma of a pedestrian accident in East Galesburg, you require reliable, proficient legal support to navigate these complicated times. Carlson Bier has built an enviable reputation on its expertise: delivering high-standard legal services specifically targeted towards dealing with pedestrian accidents. Our experienced attorneys comprehend the complexity and nuances that surround such unfortunate circumstances, ensuring that every case receives the personalized attention it deserves. What sets us apart is our unwavering commitment to advocate for justice. With our unparalleled understanding of Illinois laws and procedures, we confidently work to gain maximum compensation while upholding your rights at all times. Remember not just any law firm can tackle these complex cases; it demands specific experience combined with profound knowledge about local regulations governed by Illinois laws—a niche which Carlson Bier proudly occupies as leaders within this domain. Economic recovery post-accident is paramount; trust no one but Carlson Bier for your representation when seeking reparation following a pedestrian accident in East Galesburg.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in East Galesburg Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are relentlessly committed to providing robust legal representation and advocating for clients who have suffered pedestrian accidents in Illinois. A devastating reality of our modern urban lifestyle is that every year countless lives are upturned by unforeseen pedestrian incidents. Unprepared victims find themselves embroiled not just in physical healing but also the daunting navigation of making successful claims against responsible parties.

A few salient points to understand about pedestrian accident include:

– Pedestrians are 1.5 times more likely than passenger vehicle occupants to succumb in a car crash.

– Most pedestrian fatalities occur in the night hours and often involve alcohol on behalf of the driver or the pedestrian.

Experience has shown us that many pedestrians, unfortunately, don’t realize their rights under Illinois law after an incident occurs. From this vantage point, they may lose out on potential compensation due them without even realizing it.

Pedestrian accidents can lead to substantial injuries including fractures, brain injuries, spinal cord injuries among others; and these could negatively impact one’s quality of life significantly. But rest assured – when you entrust your case with us at Carlson Bier, your predicament becomes a personal concern for us as well; guiding you from uncertainty towards obtaining necessary justice and recompense which inevitably aids healing.

Countless factors contribute to each unique accident such as distracted driving – be it via mobile phone usage or other means-, alcohol-impaired drivers, excessive speeding or simply failing to yield right-of-way. The implications can seem overwhelming for any victim trying to juggle managing their health prognosis alongside seeking necessary recompense through insurance claims processes fraught with red tape.

Our seasoned team at Carlson Bier navigates these complex issues daily utilizing comprehensive investigative techniques. We dissect every contributing factor – however minute– ensuring none slip through cracks due to oversight. This thorough attention guarantees maximized claims underpinned by compelling evidence strengthening legal arguments immensely.

Yet insurance firms notoriously avoid paying full claim amounts to clients unless compelled. The untrained individual is at compelling disadvantage in striving for fair compensation devoid of adept representation. Legal jargon, inconsistent stories, and immense paperwork can not just be overwhelming but potentially manipulative.

At Carlson Bier, we grasp the intricacies of these strategies employers adopt coupled with vast courtroom experience, resulting in overwhelmingly successful victories on behalf of our valued clientele over the years. In addition, our no-win-no-fee philosophy ensures you bear zero financial burden while receiving top-notch representation.

We envisage a scenario where victims are placed first above insurance firms thus evolving towards comprehensive justice and retribution; bridging an environment where pedestrian safety will become a reality rather than mere rhetoric spoken by authorities annually.

Ready to take absolute control of your situation? All you need do now is click the button below to get started finding out what your case could be worth. Rest assured actioning this step.to begin learning about robust options available toward reclaiming control of your life via effective legal routes goes further than simply clicking a button. It demonstrates veritable courage –a readiness to face unpleasant scenery daringly with dedication backed by passionate representation ensuring each victory impacts more pedestrian lives positively. At Carlson Bier, remember that YOUR cause becomes OUR commitment!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For East Galesburg Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in East Galesburg

Areas of Practice in East Galesburg

Bicycle Accidents

Proficient in legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or unsafe conditions.

Flame Wounds

Supplying expert legal services for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Physician Carelessness

Providing specialist legal assistance for patients affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Obligation

Taking on cases involving problematic products, delivering specialist legal assistance to customers affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Abuse

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble & Slip Mishaps

Adept in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking redress for their harm.

Newborn Harms

Providing legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Accidents: Dedicated to aiding victims of car accidents gain reasonable settlement for damages and damages.

Scooter Collisions

Committed to providing legal advice for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for damages.

Big Rig Mishap

Ensuring expert legal support for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for damages.

Worksite Collisions

Committed to representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Neurological Traumas

Expert in delivering specialized legal representation for clients suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Damages

Specialized in tackling cases for persons who have suffered wounds from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Dedicated to legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Death

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and professional legal guidance to ensure justice.

Neural Impairment

Dedicated to defending individuals with vertebral damage, offering professional legal guidance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​