FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in East Garfield Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When the unthinkable accident of a dog-related injury occurs, seeking effective yet personalized legal aid should be your topmost priority. Look no further than Carlson Bier to robustly handle every aspect of Dog Bite Injuries cases. With an authentic reputation garnered throughout Illinois, our genuine commitment is providing comprehensive legal services that navigate through intricate aspects involved in legally dealing with such injuries. Your reassurances are justified: our demonstrable expertise and unwavering dedication position us as proficient attorneys for any individual unfortunate enough to fall victim to the harrowing incident of a dog bite. We prioritize understanding your personal experience before formulating diligent strategies set towards not only securing deserved justice but also efficient physical and emotional recovery processes post-incident. Maximize your potential claims related to medical charges, distress damages or even lost wages due to downtime spent on recuperation; we offer dedicated representation centered around safeguarding your rights while holding responsible parties accountable—thereby making Carlson Bier an undeniable choice when considering professional counsel for Dog Bite Injuries within East Garfield Park surroundings and beyond.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in East Garfield Park Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our experienced personal injury attorneys understand the trauma and disheartening effects of a dog bite injury. Based in Illinois, we have made it our mission to champion for victims of such unfortunate incidents. Unforeseen as they may be, events involving dog bites can lead to massive physical discomfort and emotional distress, not to mention long-term financial implications resulting from medical bills or lost wages during recovery time.

Especially in children who are often less capable of discerning danger in dogs, injuries from attacks can range from minor to fatal ones. The aftermath often entails extensive medical procedures like reconstructive surgery or ongoing psychological support for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In some instances, permanent scarring or disfigurement might occur leading to lifetime consequences which could affect a person’s self-esteem and overall quality of life.

Notably,

– It is crucial to understand that liability for such incidents resides with the dog owner.

– Under Illinois law, the afflicted party has full legal rights to pursue compensatory damages covering all current and future medical costs, loss of earnings, pain suffering and emotional distress.

– Dog owners’ responsibilities are clearly outlined under the ‘Illinois Animal Control Act.’

This law auxiliarily provides monumental leverage in residing justice where it is due.

Our team at Carlson Bier studies each case meticulously; mapping out fastidious research into specifics such as factors that triggered past aggression in dogs if any pre-existing conditions prompted an attack or if there were prior behavioral warning signs that were ignored by the pet owner. Additionally, we rigorously investigate circumstances precipitating an attack while also ensuring circumstantial evidence supports our client’s claim – this could be CCTV footage showcasing unsafe containment measures or witness accounts strengthening your case.

The attorneys at Carlson Bier stand committed not only towards assisting clients through their recovery journey but also towards leveraging full compensation on behalf of victims unjustifiably maimed due to negligent pet ownership. Our meticulous approach ensures a comprehensive understanding of each client’s unique circumstance, subsequently enhancing our ability to fight tenaciously for justice and deserved compensation.

Accessibility is one prominent pillar that shapes Carlson Bier’s efficacy in service pandered. Being aware of your legal rights transformed into choosing appropriate action is undoubtedly imperative. Through sharing this information we aim to empower individuals affected by such traumatic events to confidently claim their rightful compensations.

Navigating legal waters post such an experience might indeed seem intimidating, leaving many overwhelmed at the prospect. Understanding these complexities, we take pride in using clear comprehensible language suitable for any audience when explaining crucial elements relative to each case facilitating informed decisions from all those involved.

Moreover,

– The initial consultation with our specialized attorneys is entirely free.

– We operate on contingency basis meaning that fees are only solicited after successful claims have been established thereby ensuring risk-free advocacy for all clients.

The aftermath of a dog bite incident can be entirely overwhelming but you don’t have to face it alone. Allow the empathetic yet assertive lawyers at Carlson Bier help navigate through this challenging process while ensuring you recover fully; both physically and financially.

Are you curious about the potential value of your claim post a dog-bite injury? Click the button below today! Let our team provide expert legal analysis outlining what you might be entitled to under Illinois law. Your road towards recovery begins here – let us assist in lighting your way forward.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For East Garfield Park Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in East Garfield Park

Areas of Practice in East Garfield Park

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Expert in legal representation for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Burn Damages

Extending adept legal services for people of severe burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Hospital Negligence

Delivering expert legal assistance for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Responsibility

Addressing cases involving faulty products, extending specialist legal assistance to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Malpractice

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble and Slip Injuries

Skilled in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking justice for their harm.

Birth Damages

Supplying legal aid for households affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Incidents

Collisions: Concentrated on aiding victims of car accidents receive reasonable compensation for harms and damages.

Scooter Crashes

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

18-Wheeler Accident

Delivering adept legal support for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just claims for damages.

Building Accidents

Focused on representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Cognitive Damages

Specializing in delivering expert legal representation for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Damages

Specialized in managing cases for victims who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Accidents

Specializing in legal assistance for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Death

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and skilled legal support to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Injury

Expert in supporting patients with spine impairments, offering professional legal representation to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440