FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in East Garfield Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the bustling city of East Garfield Park, pedestrian accidents are unfortunately common. As a victim, it’s essential to have legal representation from attorneys who truly comprehend the weight of your experience and know how to advocate for your rights with precision and passion. The law firm you need is Carlson Bier; distinguished Illinois-based personal injury lawyers specializing in pedestrian accident cases like yours. Their team comprises tenacious professionals known for their unwavering commitment to clients’ well-being.

Carlson Bier tirelessly handles complex legalities involved in claiming compensation post-accident, fighting back against uncooperative insurers with top-tier negotiation skills honed through years in this field. They go over every detail diligently, ensuring negligent drivers accountable while fetching fair compensation commensurate with your pain, suffering loss wages & future medical care needs.

Having represented countless broad-ranged clientele from varying locations including places similar to East Garfield Park – Carlson Bier understands locality specific intricacies that influence case outcomes positively.

Trust Carlson Bier not just for their phenomenal track record but because they genuinely appreciate what’s at stake here: your peace of mind after an unsettling mishap that has left far-reaching impacts on your life.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in East Garfield Park Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your trusted team of personal injury attorneys in Illinois. We specialize in various types of personal injury cases, and today we endeavor to provide a comprehensive understanding on a rather all-too-common occurrence – Pedestrian Accidents.

A pedestrian accident is an incident where an unshielded individual, someone not inside a vehicle or similar mode of transport, faces harm due to the negligence or direct action from another party. Such accidents often lead to severe injuries due to the absence of protective barriers; hence they demand immediate attention for legal and medical aid.

The State of Illinois follows the principle known as “comparative fault” during such incidents. It means that even if you as a pedestrian share some degree of responsibility in the accident, it’s still possible for you to claim damages proportional after deducting your percentage of fault. No case is too minor or too complex for us at Carlson Bier – every person deserves just compensation when their safety has been compromised.

Common causes behind pedestrian accidents include but aren’t limited to:

– Distracted drivers.

– Failure to yield right of way at crosswalks.

– Speeding near populated areas.

– Lackadaisical law enforcement reducing road safety measures.

– Alcohol-impaired drivers.

Understanding these crucial factors enables you stay vigilant while on foot within bustling shared spaces.

As your personal injury advocate, we believe prevention forms the first line against any mishap. Here are essential safety reminders:

– Always use marked crosswalks when available.

– Avoid distractions such as phones while walking near traffic.

– Stay visible and try wearing reflective clothing especially during dark hours.

– As far as possible, walk facing oncoming traffic should there be no sidewalks present.

Despite adhering strictly to the provided guidelines though, unforeseen situations may occur when pedestrians fall victims through no fault of theirs. During these trying moments, navigating through insurance claims and legal procedures can be worrisome. This is where our seasoned team comes to your aid. We diligently work on procuring the financial compensation deserved to undergo medical treatments, secure loss in income or rehabilitation that helps restore pre-accident lifestyle.

At Carlson Bier, we are dedicated and committed to representing your interests rather than appeasing insurance corporations. Our client-first approach in every single case has led to numerous successful outcomes for personal injury victims all through Illinois.

We owe our favorable reputation largely by offering clients an open dialogue at each stage of their case – right from initial consultation until possible settlement or trial. Through this commitment of transparency, you can be rest assured we’re focused on what’s best for your complete recovery and legal success.

Illinois law mandates certain time limits (known as statute of limitations) within which a claim should be filed post an accident. If you’ve been involved in a pedestrian accident recently, waste no time in seeking out professional guidance – call us today!

We implore you — do not let the regressive aftermath following accidents hold power over your future prospects. Allow us at Carlson Bier Personal Injury Attorneys be the strength required for negotiating such trying times effectively.

For more detailed analysis on how much potentially could be claimed considering individual factors applicable in any specific case scenario; click on the button below to find out how much your case might worth.

At Carlson Bier, you come first – together let’s carve out justice served rightly!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For East Garfield Park Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in East Garfield Park

Areas of Practice in East Garfield Park

Bicycle Mishaps

Specializing in legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or risky conditions.

Burn Wounds

Extending adept legal support for victims of major burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Clinical Malpractice

Delivering experienced legal representation for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Accountability

Taking on cases involving problematic products, providing expert legal help to victims affected by faulty goods.

Aged Abuse

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble & Fall Occurrences

Professional in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking restitution for their injuries.

Childbirth Wounds

Providing legal guidance for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Collisions: Devoted to aiding individuals of car accidents receive reasonable remuneration for injuries and harm.

Motorbike Crashes

Committed to providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

Truck Crash

Extending experienced legal services for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for damages.

Construction Site Mishaps

Engaged in defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Neurological Traumas

Specializing in ensuring compassionate legal advice for persons suffering from head injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Wounds

Proficient in handling cases for persons who have suffered damages from dog bites or animal assaults.

Jogger Collisions

Expert in legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Passing

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and adept legal support to ensure justice.

Neural Impairment

Dedicated to representing clients with spinal cord injuries, offering professional legal representation to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440