Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in East Garfield Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the aftermath of a Slip And Fall Accident in East Garfield Park, residents should consider the reputable legal expertise of Carlson Bier. This personal injury law firm excels at handling such complex cases thanks to their extensive knowledge and dedication. Countless individuals have benefited from our distinctive approach to these specific accidents, receiving guidance that comprehensively addresses all legally complex areas. A significant strength of Carlson Bier lies within our ability to efficiently navigate Illinois law, ensuring your claim is appropriately lodged and followed through for maximum recovery potential. Through diligent case preparation, effective negotiation skills, and an unwavering focus on client satisfaction—we strive to secure just compensation for injuries sustained due to someone else’s negligence or recklessness. Trusting us means having complete confidence that every aspect of your case will be meticulously managed by skilled attorneys committed entirely to upholding your rights against formidable adversaries who seek minimal payouts.

About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in East Garfield Park Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in advocating for victims of personal injury cases. Illinois residents who’ve been injured due to slip and fall accidents find their legal guardians in our formidable attorneys, fortified with years of experience and renowned for providing comprehensive legal counsel.

Slip and Fall cases, a specific genre of personal injury law also often termed as “trip and fall”, are unexpected incidents that typically occur when an individual stumbles on a rough surface, slips on a wet floor, or trips over a hazardous object left negligently within walkways or paths. An untamed portion of nature’s wrath such as ice or snow can potentially cause Slip and Fall incidents too. But irrespective of the varied causative factors behind these accidents, responsible parties must be held accountable if their negligence contributes to your pain and suffering.

• Liability – Any business owner, landlord or property manager might fall under the purview of responsibility for maintaining safe conditions which prevent potential Slip & Fall mishaps from transpiring. If there is any knowledge or ‘should-have-been‘ awareness regarding any unsafe condition yet no prompt action was taken to rectify it then they could be held legally liable.

• Proving Negligence – The onus rests upon you the plaintiff to prove that the property owner was at fault by knowingly allowing hazardous conditions to prevail. Photographic evidence, eyewitness accounts, incident reports are among primary evidences necessary.

• Compensation – Lost wages due medical leave post-accident recovery phase; medical bills including ambulance fees, doctor consultations; pain & suffering inflicted psychologically post-incident — receive rightful compensation for all damages physical and psychological alike.

At Carlson Bier we have extensive proficiency in navigating complex terrain of these nuances associated with Slip & Fall accident laws. Our strategic approach coupled with meticulous case-preparation transforms into effective representation ensuring our clients get justice they deserve for injuries sustained due to someone else’s oversight.

While every case bears unique intricacies needing personalized attention, our commitment remains steadfast towards all our clients. We invest dedicated efforts to comprehend the impact of each incident on your life and meticulously build your case by collecting tangible proof to hold negligent parties accountable.

Dealing with pain due an unfortunate accident is grueling enough; you don’t need added stress of navigating tricky legal procedures. It’s where Carlson Bier steps in, easing off burdensome legal challenges while letting you concentrate best on restoring health & normalcy.

Do remember though: statutes stipulate a limited time frame within which a Slip & Fall lawsuit needs be filed post-accident — the ‘statute of limitations’. According to Illinois law, it is two years from the date of injury for personal injury claims. So do not delay seeking trusted legal counsel for fighting your rightful claim’s battle.

Lastly but significantly, if worried about possible hefty fee concerns deterring access to quality representation that you rightfully deserve then rest easy! Carlson Bier advocates operate under contingency-based plan – we get paid only if we win your case!

You have already dealt with hardships imposed due unanticipated accidents; let us shoulder your fight for justice henceforth. The value of each personal injury case varies greatly based on circumstances around cause and effect alike — determining financial recovery involves myriad complexities such as deciphering comparative negligence or calculating non-tangible damages correctly.

Therefore now even as you read through these words, invite yourself to take upon this enriched wisdom further into personalized evaluative discussion regarding your own specific circumstance – utilize below button clicking upon which facilitates discovering what worth does your exclusive case holds potentially earmarking possibilities for compensation hitherto unconsidered perhaps!

Remember it is not just about winning; it indeed is more about ensuring that justice done prevails – allow us at Carlson Bier, Personal Injury Attorneys based in Illinois rendering caring yet strong representation intertwined within clients’ tailored requirements and thus ensuring their rights are robustly protected throughout!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For East Garfield Park Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in East Garfield Park

Areas of Practice in East Garfield Park

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Focused on legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Scald Wounds

Offering specialist legal assistance for victims of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Medical Incompetence

Offering experienced legal support for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Commodities Liability

Managing cases involving problematic products, supplying specialist legal support to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble & Tumble Injuries

Professional in dealing with tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking justice for their losses.

Neonatal Traumas

Extending legal help for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Incidents: Concentrated on guiding clients of car accidents obtain appropriate compensation for damages and destruction.

Motorbike Crashes

Committed to providing representation for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

18-Wheeler Incident

Providing adept legal assistance for drivers involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for hurts.

Building Mishaps

Dedicated to assisting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or misconduct.

Brain Traumas

Specializing in extending dedicated legal support for patients suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Traumas

Proficient in addressing cases for clients who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Incidents

Expert in legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering recovery.

Unjust Death

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and expert legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Backbone Injury

Dedicated to supporting victims with spine impairments, offering professional legal services to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer