Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in East Garfield Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

At Carlson Bier, we understand the emotional and physical pain associated with spinal cord injuries. Our dedicated team of specialized attorneys regularly handles complex, high-stake personal injury cases stemming from spinal cord damage in East Garfield Park area. We appreciate the unique legal challenges that are involved in these extraordinary circumstances and bring exceptional expertise to navigate you through them for a full restitution claim. Over the years, our recognition affirms us as top-tier advocates who earnestly fight for justice, striving beyond standard compensation expectations for our clients’ wellbeing while respecting Illinois laws fully. With an impressive record of securing fair settlements and verdicts that truly reflect your immediate needs and future care often overlooked by insurers; it’s evident Carlson Bier is indeed your best consideration for representation after a spinal cord injury ordeal. It’s time to trust professionals who prioritize your recovery journey – advocating fiercely yet compassionately on your behalf when you’re most vulnerable – let us shoulder this burden so you can focus on healing as we relentlessly fight for what you deserve.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in East Garfield Park Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we define ourselves as a dedicated and proficient personal injury attorney group based in Illinois. One area of specialization that is significantly tackled by our experienced team of specialists involves spinal cord injuries, an extremely sensitive matter with potentially life-altering implications.

Spinal cord injury predominantly arises from unforeseen accidents or vicious acts of violence and can result in partial or full loss of motor control and sensation. These incidents can overwhelm the affected individuals both physically and emotionally. Nonetheless, at Carlson Bier, we stand tall to alleviate your misery and strive for justice relentlessly.

Foremost, it’s essential to understand that spinal cord injuries broadly fall into two categories: complete injuries where there is total loss of function below the level of injury; and incomplete injuries where some sensory or motor functions remain intact below the level of injury. Knowing this basic distinction helps victims grasp better their condition and what sort of legal counsel they might require in pursuing compensation claims.

The extensive impact on quality of life following spinal cord injury cannot be underestimated. It ranges from physical challenges such as paralysis or weakness in parts of the body, changes in sexual function, pain, amongst others to psychological issues like depression or anxiety induced by sudden lifestyle adjustments post-injury. At Carlson Bier, we advocate fiercely for clients who have fallen victim to these harsh circumstances due to negligence or intentional harm done by another party.

Particular points worth noting about spinal cord injuries include:

• The manifestation varies widely depending on the severity (minor vs. severe)

• Medical costs incurred are often extremely high due to lengthy hospitalizations

• Significant alterations may be required at home for accessibility

• Substantial losses may occur relating to earning capacity

• Vocational rehabilitation therapy might necessitate additional costs

Amidst all these devastating elements lies rich scholarly research indicating lifetime costs associated with living with a typical spinal cord injury could range substantially from three-quarters to several million dollars depending on age during infliction and severity. At Carlson Bier, we believe you should not have to shoulder this burden on your own when the injury resulted from someone else’s wrongdoing.

Having an unyielding personal injury attorney by your side through these tribulations could be of paramount importance towards securing a reasonable settlement that adequately covers immediate as well as long-term medical costs, lost wages, home adjustments expenses, pain suffering, among other considerations. Our attorneys at Carlson Bier meticulously examine every aspect pertaining to your situation to mount a solid case aimed at winning you maximum compensation.

We comprehend how intimidating pursuing legal recourse can seem for victims who are already grappling with considerable distress arising from spinal cord injuries. We therefore simplify legal jargon into digestible knowledge empowering our clients throughout the entire process. Highlighting all possible options and potential outcomes serves as an integral element guiding our approach in ensuring crystal clear communication devoid of ambiguity about where the case stands at any given point.

At Carlson Bier, we honor our commitment to serving justice sincerely by operating strictly within Illinois law and adhering faithfully to its prevailing jurisdictional prerequisites. As such, we only endorse locations where our physical offices exist—thereby affirming utmost integrity while precluding any deceptive advertising practices.

Navigating through life following a devastating injury requires more than resilience; it demands reliable allies who will fight for fairness tirelessly on your behalf without compromising integrity or authenticity. Allow Carlson Bier’s legal workforce to guide you through these challenging times and ensure justice is served regarding spinal cord injuries endured out of someone else’s negligence or conscious harmful action.

If what has been highlighted resonates with your current circumstance related to spinal cord injuries and necessitate professional intervention, consider connecting with one of the experienced personal injury attorneys at Carlson Bier today. Click on the button below now and find out exactly how much compensation for damages you might be entitled based on specific facts surrounding your unique situation.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For East Garfield Park Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in East Garfield Park

Areas of Practice in East Garfield Park

Bicycle Accidents

Focused on legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or risky conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Supplying expert legal support for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Physician Malpractice

Offering specialist legal support for persons affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Fault

Addressing cases involving dangerous products, supplying professional legal assistance to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Nursing Home Neglect

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble & Fall Injuries

Professional in dealing with trip accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking compensation for their injuries.

Childbirth Damages

Supplying legal guidance for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Motor Mishaps

Mishaps: Dedicated to helping victims of car accidents obtain reasonable compensation for injuries and harm.

Bike Mishaps

Specializing in providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Truck Collision

Offering specialist legal assistance for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for injuries.

Building Site Incidents

Concentrated on assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Brain Damages

Expert in offering specialized legal services for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Damages

Skilled in handling cases for victims who have suffered damages from dog bites or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Committed to legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Loss

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and experienced legal support to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Damage

Focused on supporting individuals with paralysis, offering dedicated legal services to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer