FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in East Hazel Crest

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with dog bite injuries in East Hazel Crest, consider the legal expertise and dedicated service of Carlson Bier. Specializing in personal injury law, our seasoned attorneys are devoted to offering premier legal representation for victims of canine attacks. We understand how traumatic such an experience can be and we strive to mitigate its overwhelming effects through scheduling timely appointments, providing clear communication about your case’s progress, and pursuing maximum compensation for your physical injuries and trauma. Leveraging extensive knowledge of Illinois’s intricate dog bite liability laws, Carlson Bier strives to best serve their clients by achieving favorable resolutions at a swift pace. You deserve compassionate representation from a firm that prioritizes you – it’s not just about winning cases; it’s also about helping people on their journey towards recovery. On experiencing the daunting impact of a dog bite incident in East Hazel Crest or any location within Illinois – allow us at Carlson Bier make this process less stressful while securing justice for you.Remember-providing stellar advocacy is just part of what we do: letting clients know they’re valued is entirety!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in East Hazel Crest Illinois

At Carlson Bier, your legal concerns are our priority. As a renowned personal injury law firm in Illinois, we present to you the urgent issue of Dog Bite Injuries. When it comes to such injuries, the aftermath is often traumatic; both physically and emotionally.Alleviating your distress by securing a fair compensation for you is significantly important to us.

Experience teaches us that dog bites can result in severe injuries with long-term implications. Numerous victims suffer not only deep flesh wounds but also grave emotional turmoil as an outcome of these trying situations.Additionally, dog bites can trigger infections like rabies or cause considerable scarring needing multiple plastic surgeries.In worse cases, some people contract psychological disorders post-incident.

The critical part lies in understanding that if you’ve been bitten by someone else’s dog, you’re entitled to financial reparation from the person responsible for controlling the canine when the bite occurred. While no monetary value can truly equate the pain suffered, it helps become instrumental in covering medical expenses and income lost due to time away from work.

To strengthen your claim after a dog bite incident:

• Secure evidence: Taking pictures from different angles showcasing the severity of injury could prove beneficial during case proceedings.

• Obtain witness information: Names and contact details of anybody who witnessed the occurrence can play salient role in affirming liability.

• Hire experienced representation: Lawyers with extensive experience dealing with similar incidents forecast probable defensive tactics and strategize accordingly.

Carlson Bier advocates strive to ensure our clients receive maximum compensation owed based on Illinois state laws.Given that these laws could be inherently complex,it takes skilled attorney representation like ours,to help navigate through them efficiently.Oftentimes,dog owners or their insurance companies attempt blaming victims for provoking dogs or being at wrong place,wrong time.We endeavor fiercely against such defense strategies while upholding your best interests resolution-orientedly.

In addition to navigating statutory complexities surrounding personal injury claims involving a pet attack,the details of your unique case are extremely crucial to us.Your hospital records,doctor diagnoses,witness statements,pictures of injury-a meticulous compilation of these elements forms a comprehensive claim for maximum compensation.Whether it’s dealing with medical providers or insurance agents,Carlson Bier attorney group follows through every step ensuring you receive a fair resolution.

Our Illinois based law firm is exclusively personal injury focused.This indispensably equips us with deepened expertise essential in handling complex cases surrounding Dog Bite Injuries.We comprehend the enormous strain injuries inflict on victims and their families.Thus we strive to ease burdens by pursuing all available resources and avenues proactively until justice is served!

Navigating dog bite liability laws without professional guidance can add unnecessary stress to an already traumatizing situation.Choosing Carlson Bier ensures that you won’t have to go through this process alone.Our rigorous work ethic,diligent practices,integrated approach,numerous success stories pay testament to our steadfast commitment in securing rightful compensations on behalf of our clients.

Now that you’re aware about intricacies revolving around Dog Bite Injuries,it’s time we help assess what your specific case could potentially be worth. Unwavering pursuit of rights wouldn’t get any better than having a dedicated firm like Carlson Bier guide you throughout. As a next prudent step,click on the button below.Let us offer assistance towards understand how much justice might owe you! Trust Carlson Bier,today and always.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For East Hazel Crest Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in East Hazel Crest

Areas of Practice in East Hazel Crest

Cycling Accidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or risky conditions.

Burn Damages

Extending adept legal assistance for patients of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Healthcare Misconduct

Providing experienced legal advice for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Obligation

Managing cases involving defective products, offering adept legal guidance to victims affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Neglect

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to neglect in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble & Trip Accidents

Skilled in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking restitution for their suffering.

Childbirth Harms

Offering legal support for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Auto Incidents

Incidents: Devoted to aiding sufferers of car accidents secure fair recompense for wounds and losses.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for bikers involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Big Rig Incident

Delivering expert legal advice for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for losses.

Worksite Incidents

Concentrated on representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Brain Harms

Specializing in delivering expert legal advice for clients suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Traumas

Adept at dealing with cases for clients who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Committed to legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Demise

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and experienced legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Spine Damage

Committed to advocating for persons with spinal cord injuries, offering dedicated legal support to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440