FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in East Hazel Crest

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one has suffered a Spinal Cord Injury in East Hazel Crest, seeking legal representation from Carlson Bier is the right decision. As a prominent firm based in Illinois, Carlson Bier specializes in personal injury law. Their proficiency extends particularly to cases involving spinal cord injuries where they complement the complexities of medical undertakings with thorough legal expertise. Ensuring their clients best interests are prioritized, they navigate the often-complex realm of personal injury claims and insurance settlements seamlessly eliminating added stress to an already challenging situation. At Carlson Bier, they believe everyone deserves quality representation following such traumatic experiences; assisting individuals reclaim their financial stability and regain control over their lives post-injury has become our recurring accomplishment story throughout Illinois state. Combining personalized attention with fierce advocacy backed by comprehensive knowledge about spinal cord injuries make them trustworthy allies who tirelessly pursue justice for those stricken by unfortunate circumstances. Choose Carlson Bier: Painstakingly fighting for your deserved settlement while easing your path towards recovery.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in East Hazel Crest Illinois

At Carlson Bier, your health and recovery are our top priority. As an esteemed law firm in Illinois, we specialize in personal injury cases – specifically those involving spinal cord injuries. Tragically, these are often life-altering circumstances that can lead to significant pain, loss of function, or even paralysis. They may arise due to a variety of situations such as automobile accidents, slips and falls, sports injuries or acts of violence. We understand the emotional distress and financial burden associated with these incidents which is why achieving justice for you is so critical.

Spinal cord injuries fundamentally disrupt the communication between your brain and the rest of your body parts that control sensation and movement. Experiencing them not only damages your physical well-being but also impairs your mental capacity significantly:

– It causes either complete or incomplete loss of motor control and sensation.

– It paralyzes some specific body parts making it unable to move.

– Lastly, it disrupts essential body functions like breathing and bowel control.

When dealing with legal processes concerning spinal cord injuries, there are crucial aspects worth highlighting:

• Proving Negligence: The first step in such cases involves proving that this injury was as a result of someone else’s negligence.

• Assessing Damages: Both economic (like medical expenses) and non-economic (pain & suffering) are taken into account.

• Seeking fair compensation: Once the above two have been established convincingly; then one can seek appropriate compensation for their pain & hardship.

Navigating through complex legalities while focusing on recuperation could be truly daunting. This is where our team steps up – composed of highly skilled personal injury attorneys specializing in spinal cord trauma litigation under Illinois law. Our expert knowledge enables us to guide our clients effectively through each stage; right from gathering cogent evidence backing up claims to negotiating aggressive settlements with insurance firms or taking the case to court if necessary, so you can focus solely on healing.

At Carlson Bier, we are driven to ensure that you receive full and fair compensation. We endeavor to secure the restitution for current medical costs, future medical care (including therapies and rehabilitation), loss of earning capacity as well as the emotional distress experienced due to trauma.

Client confidence is one of our top most priorities which is why we operate on a contingency fee basis. Simply put, if we do not win your case or obtain a settlement on your behalf, you owe us nothing. This indicates our commitment towards successfully resolving our clients’ cases while minimizing any risk or financial strain for them.

Taking legal action in such devastating situations may seem complex and overwhelming but remember; seeking justice isn’t merely about receiving adequate recompense for the damages incurred but it’s also essential in preventing similar future incidences that could harm others.

At Carlson Bier, we don’t just offer legal support; we offer reassurance – reassurance that you’re not alone in this daunting journey. Our dedicated team will be by your side – fighting tirelessly for your rights every step of the way, embodying professionalism while embracing empathy wholeheartedly.

Don’t continue suffering silently after enduring a spinal cord injury due to negligence – You deserve better! Reclaim your life with our expert guidance at Carlson Bier today. Our reputation speaks volumes about our dedication and persistence in achieving outstanding results for those grappling with exceedingly challenging circumstances like these.

Wondering how much your case might be worth? We ardently encourage you to click on the button below right now – get an estimate instantly! Remember, seeking knowledgeable legal help immediately post the incident can truly turn around your situation and instill hope even out of despair so act now without delay!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For East Hazel Crest Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in East Hazel Crest

Areas of Practice in East Hazel Crest

Bike Accidents

Specializing in legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or dangerous conditions.

Burn Wounds

Giving specialist legal advice for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Clinical Malpractice

Offering dedicated legal representation for clients affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Fault

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, delivering expert legal support to consumers affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Malpractice

Defending the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble and Trip Accidents

Expert in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to persons seeking compensation for their damages.

Childbirth Traumas

Providing legal assistance for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Accidents: Committed to assisting individuals of car accidents get just remuneration for wounds and impairment.

Motorcycle Crashes

Focused on providing legal support for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

Trucking Collision

Extending professional legal representation for persons involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for damages.

Construction Site Crashes

Focused on defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Neurological Harms

Focused on extending professional legal representation for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Damages

Proficient in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Specializing in legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Wrongful Demise

Working for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and expert legal services to ensure redress.

Neural Injury

Committed to assisting patients with vertebral damage, offering professional legal representation to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​