...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Bicycle Accidents in Edinburg

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the wake of a bicycle accident, you need legal expertise that is focused, experienced and unwavering. That’s where Carlson Bier steps in; an acclaimed personal injury law firm offering adept representation tailored just for your situation. Specializing in navigating complex bicycle accidents cases while dedicated to protecting victims’ rights ardently, their attorney group has built a trustworthy reputation based on results. They employ strategic negotiation skills coupled with knowledge of Illinois laws to get clients the compensation they merit. Their impeccable record defending victims even from Edinburg speaks volumes about their expansive reach in providing astute legal support across diverse jurisdictions without compromising quality or satisfaction levels.

Carlson Bier rises above as a beacon amidst angst and confusion post-accidents; prioritizing your recovery whilst striving towards getting deserved justice served swiftly yet efficaciously! Trust them as the vanguard spearheading your case with fierce determination & unrivaled focus; after all, at its heart Carlson Bier remains committed to serving justice one client at a time.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Edinburg Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our team of accomplished personal injury attorneys is dedicated to representing the rights and interest of individuals involved in bicycle accidents within the state of Illinois. As a testament to our commitment, we strive to deliver comprehensive educational content, detailing intricate aspects related to injuries caused in bicycle-related mishaps. By firmly placing client education at the forefront of our practice, we believe that understanding your case is an essential first step towards making informed decisions and formulating effective legal strategies.

In Illinois, cyclists hold an equivalent right to share the road with motorists, along with an identical duty regarding observing traffic laws. However, circumstances causing bicycle accidents notably differ from other forms of motor vehicle collision due to factors such as the reduced visibility and unprotected exposure experienced by bicyclists. These variance often translates into unique challenges when seeking compensation for incurred damages in personal injury cases stemming from these incidents.

Primarily associated key considerations include:

• Identification – Drivers frequently argue that they didn’t see the cyclist on account of their lesser physical presence relative to larger vehicles or because the incident occurred during low-light conditions.

• Road conditions – The effect of potholes or inadequate road maintenance often compounds exponentially for cyclists compared to drivers ensconced within a protective frame.

• Evasive action – Cyclists have fewer choices when it comes to evading danger as swerving might lead them into opposing traffic while slamming breaks could induce falls.

These elements undoubtedly heighten complexities inherent in bicycling accident cases where careful examination can make a profound difference during legal proceedings.

When navigating through this challenging terrain after experiencing a biking accident, empowering yourself with professional guidance largely enhances prospects for securing ample compensation. At Carlson Bier, our seasoned attorneys excel through astute attention given towards individual cases which aids toward holistic representation tailored aptly according to particular situations. We champion exceptional service provision grounded upon meticulous investigation and expert analysis designed specifically around details pertaining to individual cases.

Understanding that every incident carries its own exclusive circumstances, our lawyers will collaboratively work with you in order to ensure your every concern is adequately addressed. Going beyond conventional duties associated with legal representation, we will also assist towards managing bills, negotiating with insurance companies and providing access to quality medical care where required.

Devising an impactful start towards litigation involved in bicycle accident cases begins from the point of incident itself. If possible, under initial response measures:

• Immediately notify police and if feasible, keep all involved parties at the scene until police arrive.

• Seek medical attention promptly even when injuries seem minor as some could manifest subsequently over time.

• Gather information including names, contact details as well related insurance particulars from all people involved while also making a note of witness identities present on scene.

• Avoid admitting fault or offering extensive commentary regarding the accident without first consulting with a lawyer.

By following this advice promptly after an accident can provide significant assistance going forward during potential litigations.

At Carlson Bier, our worry-free consultation service ensures that you rest easy knowing that professional guidance is just one simple click away. Our steadfast commitment remains focused on alleviating stress by helping citizens throughout Illinois understand their rights and options available when accidents occur. We welcome the opportunity to demonstrate how our team’s expertise can help solidify your claim’s standing amidst the competition prevalent today within personal injury law domain.

Remember – learning more about your case directly impacts decisions critically influencing outcomes. Why wait? Click the button below right now to learn what your case may be worth. Let Carlson Bier safeguard both – your rights and peace of mind as we guide you through these challenging times together!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Edinburg Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Edinburg

Areas of Practice in Edinburg

Cycling Incidents

Expert in legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Scald Wounds

Offering adept legal help for people of serious burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Hospital Negligence

Delivering professional legal services for victims affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Merchandise Liability

Handling cases involving defective products, supplying professional legal assistance to individuals affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Abuse

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble & Stumble Mishaps

Adept in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking compensation for their damages.

Infant Damages

Delivering legal guidance for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Incidents: Devoted to supporting sufferers of car accidents secure just settlement for hurts and damages.

Motorbike Collisions

Dedicated to providing legal support for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Trucking Mishap

Providing adept legal support for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for damages.

Worksite Collisions

Dedicated to advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Cognitive Injuries

Dedicated to ensuring dedicated legal advice for victims suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Wounds

Adept at dealing with cases for victims who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Crashes

Dedicated to legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Death

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and expert legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Neural Trauma

Focused on defending victims with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal services to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​