FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in El Paso

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Involved in a pedestrian accident in El Paso? The team at Carlson Bier has built an extensive reputation and proven track record for representing victims of such incidents. Pedestrian accidents often result in serious physical injuries, emotional distress, medical costs, and loss of income which can feel overwhelming. Our experienced attorneys at Carlson Bier understand the intricacies involved as we meticulously handle each case with strong determination to pursue fair compensation on our client’s behalf. We possess the intricate knowledge of Texas law required to tackle these types of cases successfully while prioritizing professionalism and compassion. With vast experience related specifically to pedestrian accidents, our group is unrivaled when it comes to advocacy for your rights after an unfortunate event like this one occurs unexpectedly on streets or intersections anywhere within El Paso city limits. Choosing Carlson Bier means entrusting your case into capable hands that will tenaciously champion your interests without compromise!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in El Paso Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are dedicated to representing victims of pedestrian accidents in Illinois. When you or your loved ones face the aftermath of a pedestrian accident, your world can turn upside down with hospital bills piling up and income slowing due to injury-related limitations. Our skilled team stands by you, offering personalized legal assistance during this challenging time.

Pedestrian accidents often result from negligence or recklessness on the part of motorists. These incidents may involve a driver who is drunk, distracted by using a mobile phone while driving, or disobeying traffic signals and signs. The consequences of these tragic events leave victims suffering from life-altering injuries such as spinal cord trauma, brain damage, fractures, and in some cases wrongful death.

Your rights after a pedestrian accident should never be neglected nor overlooked:

– You have the right to safety as a pedestrian.

– You have the right to demand responsibility from reckless drivers.

– And more importantly, you have the right for compensation if you become an unfortunate victim.

Legal processes following these accidents can often be complicated and demanding for those unacquainted with Illinois road laws and personal injury claims. At Carlson Bier we understand these intricacies clearly — utilizing our robust legal expertise honed over years of practice in Illinois to work assiduously towards getting reparations that match your losses.

Among many factors that set us apart include:

– Our extensive knowledge handling personal injury calms: We offer comprehensive legal services aimed at securing maximum compensation for damages inflicted upon pedestrians involved in motor vehicle collisions.

– Legal representation tailored to individual client needs: Each case is unique; so is every client’s story. We provide case-specific advice based on our thorough analysis of your unique scenario.

– Personal dedication & expert litigation capabilities: Right from negotiation stages through trials (if necessary), we remain dedicatedly invested in advocating for your best interests.

As advocates for justice against negligence-induced harm on travel pathways around Illinois cities and suburbs, Carlson Bier attorneys devote enormous care and attention to each stage of your case. We meticulously gather evidence, identify liable parties, assess damages incurred — including medical costs, loss of income during the recovery period or potential future earnings in cases involving serious injury.

We then factor these findings into crafting a strategic legal plan aimed at achieving the best possible outcome for you: be it securing amicable settlements through negotiation or aggressively advocating on your behalf at trial to achieve the judgment you deserve. Our proven track record attests to our commitment towards ensuring not just any settlement, but one that wholly redresses your predicament.

Moreover, we operate on a contingency basis meaning if we don’t win compensation for you; you owe us nothing. This is our no-win, no-fee assurance so that financial constraints do not stand in the way of justice seeking victims of pedestrian accidents.

In Illinois where commuting by foot is commonplace due to our rich urban infrastructure and delightful suburban landscapes, knowing what actions to take post-incidence might make all the difference between suffering silently and gaining rightful restitution for your detrimental experience.

If you’ve been injured in an accident as a pedestrian owing to someone else’s negligence or recklessness, time is of immense essence. Taking prompt action ensures preserving crucial evidence and testimonies which strengthen your stance when seeking reparation.

And when this stage arises — having adept legal counsel by your side matters significantly too! The experienced team of personal injury attorneys at Carlson Bier remain ready at every juncture providing requisite guidance throughout these complicated processes with compassion & dedication!

So why wait? Simply click on the button below and discover how much your case could potentially be worth. Let’s embark upon this journey towards justice together with Carlson Bier — because every step counts when regaining control over altered lives post-pedestrian mishaps!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For El Paso Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in El Paso

Areas of Practice in El Paso

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Proficient in legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or perilous conditions.

Fire Injuries

Supplying specialist legal help for victims of major burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Healthcare Carelessness

Delivering expert legal advice for persons affected by hospital malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Fault

Addressing cases involving problematic products, offering expert legal support to victims affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Malpractice

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble & Fall Accidents

Specialist in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking compensation for their suffering.

Childbirth Traumas

Extending legal guidance for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Accidents

Incidents: Focused on assisting victims of car accidents receive fair remuneration for damages and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Expert in providing representation for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Big Rig Mishap

Providing specialist legal representation for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just compensation for losses.

Building Incidents

Concentrated on assisting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Brain Harms

Dedicated to offering dedicated legal services for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Harms

Expertise in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from dog bites or creature assaults.

Jogger Accidents

Focused on legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Unjust Fatality

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and adept legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Dedicated to supporting clients with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​