FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in Elgin

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When seeking expert representation in Products Liability cases, Carlson Bier emerges as the leading choice. As an established personal injury law firm in Illinois, we hold a profound understanding of the state’s complex legal landscape. Our seasoned attorneys have continually demonstrated their acumen by successfully litigating numerous products liability claims for our clients. We’re deeply committed to preserving every client’s rights and provide nothing less than exceptional service marked by diligence and professionalism.

Our wealth of experience dealing with defective or dangerous products places us at a vantage point when it comes to understanding their varied effects on consumers’ lives. With Carlson Bier by your side, you can be certain that any form of negligence undertaken by manufacturers will not go unnoticed or unchallenged.

Choosing Carlson Bier ensures access to legal counsel dedicated to aligning any restitution with the severity of damages incurred—financial or otherwise—from defective merchandise. Our aggressive yet ethical approach assures secure navigation through all stages of litigation as well as negotiation procedures involved in these cases. Your search for outstanding Products Liability legal assistance ends at Carlson Bier.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Elgin Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are committed to representing individuals who have suffered injuries as a result of defective or dangerous products. As Illinois-based personal injury lawyers, we possess an in-depth understanding of the complexities surrounding product liability claims and employ proven strategies that maximize our clients compensation.

Product Liability Law in Illinois involves a complex array of federal and state laws designed to protect citizens from unsafe products. Whether it’s faulty household items, tainted food products, or hazardous medical devices, manufacturers can be held liable if their goods cause harm due to manufacturing defects, design flaws, or insufficient warnings.

Understanding that each case is unique and taking into account its specifics is the backbone of our practice. We identify whether your injury was caused by negligence (such as improper assembly), strict liability (meaning the product was inherently dangerous), or breach of warranty (failure to uphold claimed product quality). This rigorous assessment allows us to build a formidable case on your behalf.

Key points in Products Liability law include:

– The Duty To Warn: Manufacturers must provide sufficient warning about potential risks associated with using their products.

– Strict Product Liability: A manufacturer may be held responsible for injuries resulting from defects despite not being negligent.

– Establishing Fault: Crucial in these cases is proving that the product indeed caused the injury, also considering whether misuse played any role.

The team at Carlson Bier understands these facets thoroughly and will expertly navigate them while building your claim. Our prowess sees us handling a broad range of product liability cases including but not limited to auto parts defects, harmful drugs or medical devices, defective child safety seats and toys, equipment malfunctions and construction site accidents.

Navigating litigation can be daunting; this is why you need experienced legal representation like ours at Carlson Beir. With exceptional acumen for substantiating claims laid against companies big and small alike -sometimes found across various states-, we do not back down until justice has been duly served. Our vast resources ensure exhaustive investigations into your case, obtaining expert testimonies when necessary and diligently preparing for trials.

Your rights as a consumer must be protected. If you or a loved one has been injured due to a defective product, it is essential to contact an experienced personal injury lawyer promptly. Time limitations apply to these claims under Illinois law; therefore acting swiftly can mean the difference between ample compensation and none at all.

Fight back against negligent product manufacturers with Carlson Bier; let us put our skills, knowledge, and dedication to work for you! We firmly believe that when products fail and cause harm, someone needs to answer for that—and it isn’t you!

It’s time to take action!. We want you to understand fully what your claim could potentially bring as far as relief goes so we invite you click the button below – let’s perform a free assessment of your case value right away! Our dedicated team will warmly welcome any queries and aim for utmost transparency while doing so. Trust in Carlson Bier – expertise in execution coupled with compassion at heart- shaping victories because ‘Your Justice Is Our Priority’.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Elgin Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Elgin

Areas of Practice in Elgin

Bike Crashes

Expert in legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Giving skilled legal assistance for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Clinical Incompetence

Extending expert legal advice for persons affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Commodities Fault

Taking on cases involving defective products, offering professional legal help to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Misconduct

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip & Stumble Accidents

Expert in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to victims seeking restitution for their injuries.

Childbirth Wounds

Extending legal help for families affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Collisions

Mishaps: Concentrated on guiding individuals of car accidents secure fair settlement for hurts and harm.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Expert in providing representation for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for damages.

Semi Incident

Ensuring expert legal services for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for losses.

Construction Site Mishaps

Concentrated on assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or misconduct.

Head Damages

Focused on offering compassionate legal advice for patients suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Injuries

Expertise in addressing cases for individuals who have suffered wounds from puppy bites or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Focused on legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Death

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and skilled legal representation to ensure restitution.

Vertebral Damage

Committed to defending patients with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal support to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440