Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Elmhurst

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with severe dog bite injuries in Elmhurst, the eminent and reliable Carlson Bier law firm is your top choice for legal representation. The attorneys at Carlson Bier have an extensive success record of handling these specialized personal injury cases – which require advanced knowledge and experience within this complex realm of law. Our compassionate approach is coupled with aggressive litigation skills, as we fervently protect our clients’ rights to compensation. We understand that a dog bite incident can result in not just physical trauma, but emotional distress as well. This lasting impact highlights the necessity for skilled legal support to ensure justice is served efficiently and effectively on your behalf. Let us alleviate some of your stress during this challenging time by providing you high-quality professional guidance every step along the way till recovery of damages due to dog bites injuries be it medical expenses, loss of wages or pain & suffering damages among others.In choosing us you are engaging unmatched advocacy from a reputable team dedicated solely to bettering your life post-trauma caused due to irresponsible pet owners.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Elmhurst Illinois

Welcome to the website of Carlson Bier, a premier personal injury law firm based in Illinois. Our dedicated team of attorneys specializes in various areas pertaining to personal injury law, one key aspect being Dog Bite Injuries. These incidents can be distressingly frequent and potentially devastating both physically and mentally.

We believe it is essential to understand that dog bite injuries are not just a trivial matter. They can result in severe disfigurement, nerve damage, infections, psychological trauma and in some extreme cases even death. And certainly not to be overlooked is the financial burden borne by victims and their families for medical costs including surgeries and long-term therapies.

• Significant pain & suffering

• Disfigurement

• Nerve Damage

• Serious Infections

• Psychological Trauma

Above points reflect the potential aftermath of what initially may seem like a minor incident involving animal behavior; but when left unattended or improperly handled can transcend into seriously life altering circumstances.

Among our many undertakings as your designated legal representation, we will meticulously gather all relevant evidence which will reinforce your claim. This typically includes acquiring photographs of injuries, corresponding medical records indicative of your treatment history for said injuries, statements from eyewitnesses (if any), along with other pertinent information.

It is alarming how frequently misunderstandings about who’s at fault ensue during these painful experiences; this misconstrued notion often supplants onto the victim themselves. The truth being far from it as under almost all circumstances dog owners are legally responsible when their pets harm others; regardless if the attack took place on public property or private premises excluding owner’s residence.

They could be held accountable under two doctrines:

• Negligence: fails to uphold reasonable care standard in preventing situation.

• Statutory Strict Liability: owner culpable irrespective of prior knowledge regarding pet’s aggression.

Our unrivaled experience handling cases akin ensures you will receive legal guidance informed by years worth expertise navigating such complex terrain thereby granting you peace of mind over a successful outcome.

Relying on professional representation for your dog bite injury case, as specialized personal injury Attorneys like our firm Carlson Bier can ensure that your rights are properly represented, offering you the best possible chance at receiving full compensation. Victim’s relief is not simply restricted to reimbursing medical expenses but also includes pain and suffering compensation, lost income restitution, cosmetic surgery costs and psychological counseling if needed.

There isn’t a clear methodology to gauge the means by which this form of Personal Injury Attorneys calculate damages awarded in such cases however be assured that it will primarily depend upon severity and long-term repercussions of injuries inflicted; ensuring amount correlates with just retribution for endured hardship.

Utilizing services encompassed within scope of attorneys warrants free from prohibitive fees until winning verdict or agreeable settlement has been reached. This permits those initially hesitant due to financial constraints access high-value legal counsel irrespective their economic situation.

We stand committed towards educating individuals about their legal rights whilst providing compassionate guidance borne out extensive experience navigating challenging terrain typified within personal injury law landscape.

Our mission at Carlson Bier is to alleviate as much stress from these unfortunate events by pairing unmatched professionalism alongside deeply vested interest in every client’s welfare; lending way towards restoration normality they earnestly seek following tumultuous happenings outside realm control.

Discover how much other victims we have helped recovered – millions to be precise – when faced under similar circumstances by clicking on button conveniently located below page directing you find out what may potentially recuperate through comprehensive assessment afflicted condition rendered by capable hands aboard Illinois’ Carlson-Bier dedicated staff aiming restore justice while procuring requisite restitution necessary aid recovery process ensuing relentless pursuit rightful vindication.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Elmhurst Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Elmhurst

Areas of Practice in Elmhurst

Cycling Mishaps

Dedicated to legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Burn Burns

Supplying expert legal services for sufferers of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or negligence.

Clinical Negligence

Providing expert legal support for patients affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Fault

Dealing with cases involving defective products, providing skilled legal help to customers affected by harmful products.

Nursing Home Mistreatment

Defending the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Trip and Fall Incidents

Adept in dealing with trip accident cases, providing legal services to victims seeking compensation for their suffering.

Infant Damages

Offering legal assistance for kin affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Car Crashes

Collisions: Committed to guiding sufferers of car accidents receive appropriate recompense for damages and impairment.

Motorcycle Collisions

Dedicated to providing legal support for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

18-Wheeler Incident

Offering specialist legal services for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for damages.

Construction Site Accidents

Dedicated to representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Neurological Injuries

Expert in providing expert legal services for patients suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Traumas

Expertise in dealing with cases for people who have suffered harms from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Specializing in legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Unfair Death

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and professional legal services to ensure compensation.

Neural Injury

Specializing in supporting individuals with spinal cord injuries, offering expert legal guidance to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer