FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Bicycle Accidents in Elwood

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’ve experienced a bicycle accident in Elwood, it’s essential to have an adept legal team at your side. Carlson Bier is that firm. Our expertise spans years in advocating for injury victims, more specifically those involved in cycling incidents. We understand the intricacies of Illinois road laws and bike regulations better than anyone else and are committed to securing just compensation for our clients’ emotional distress, physical harm, medical bills, property damage or any other incurred losses due to negligent drivers or unsafe road conditions.

We comprehend biking isn’t merely about recreation; for many Elwood individuals it’s either a favored mode of transport or treasured pastime thus stick up consistently and tenaciously as one should after being wronged. At Carlson Bier we aren’t only asserting damages; we’re affirming every cyclist’s right to safely share the roads.

Our robust attorney-client relationships attest that Carson Bier remains unrivaled within its practice field – indicating our impressive portfolio outcome assertions with consistency.

Turn adversity into recovery by relying on Carlson Bier –providing expert personal injury lawyers who will champion your cause from start till finish.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Elwood Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we fully acknowledge the unique challenges that come with bicycle accidents. Illinois is home to scores of cycling enthusiasts as well as a vast populace using bicycles as their primary mode of transportation. The merging paths of motorists and bicyclists on busy roads sometimes culminate in unfortunate accidents, often leading to severe physical harm to the more vulnerable party – the biker.

Understanding Illinois law governing such incidents is crucial. This statute views cyclists equally with other roadway users. They have the same responsibilities and rights as any other motorist on the road system under 625 ILCS 5/11-1502, barring certain limitations. It’s an imperative piece of knowledge that weather conditions alone cannot absolve drivers’ duty to exercise due care at all times, including around bicyclists.

We have streamlined some key facts about liability in bike accidents:

– A cyclist may hold a driver liable if it can be proved that their negligence led directly or indirectly to injury inflicted upon the biker.

– Injury types often seen include head trauma, spinal injuries, fractures, or abrasions which could result in hefty medical bills.

– The cyclist must show evidence that they sustained these injuries due to someone else’s negligence and it wasn’t by any fault of theirs.

Another distinct aspect connecting you closely with Carlson Bier would be our vast experience working on settlement negotiation after being struck by uninsured or underinsured motorists (UM/UIM). These cases require an extra layer of legal expertise since victims struggle against both their physical pain and uphill battle for rightful dues.

Remember:

– UM/UIM makes up a portion of your own insurance coverage acting like ‘proxy’ insurers when you’re hit by an uninsured driver.

– Consequently, your insurance company might defend vigorously against payment even though they owe it rightly under policy terms.

Our attorneys are skilled navigators through dense legislation ensuring every avenue explored thoroughly before agreeing upon settlements outside courtrooms where adjusting firms can undervalue their claims. Carlson Bier is your ally and we help you dealing with all these intricacies associated with bicycle accidents.

We also handle wrongful death suits in the event a loved one has been fatally injured due to a biking accident caused by negligent drivers. We recognize that no compensation could fill the void left by a devastating loss of a family member, but it’s our commitment to get justice served strongly while ensuring recovery of damages so you wouldn’t be financially burdened during these sensitive times.

Being informed about what goes into building a strong case post-accident forms the crux of surviving the aftermath:

– Always contact authorities right after an accident happens

– Record witness accounts if there are any available at the scene.

– Note specifics like where or how exactly did it happen or vehicle involved

– Capture pictures on lens as they make for stronger evidence.

Inch yourself closer towards reclamation today using this sound guidance offered by our verified professionals, who underpin folio built through years of dedication. Our unyielding commitment stretches beyond offering robust legal services; empathy remains at its heart through understanding your pain and losses not only as attorneys but also fellow community members.

The determination to uphold diligence regardless of case complexity sets us apart decisively from other law firms. At Carlson Bier, attention bestowed upon detail is profound paired with seasoned dexterity transforming strong cases into winning ones.

Carry the wisdom gained here forward and seize control back into your lives from debilitating consequences of unfortunate bike accidents disrupting them suddenly. Click on the button below to discover how much your case maybe worth in actuality unbiasedly dictated by skilled expertise, not read off standard charts printed out perennially during similar situations encountered earlier. Stand up powerfully against adversity supported firmly by fierce advocates fighting multilayered battles surpassed only via persistence earned relentlessly over time here at Carlson Bier – secure fair restitution befitting wrongdoing suffered staunchly.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Elwood Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Elwood

Areas of Practice in Elwood

Bike Accidents

Proficient in legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or unsafe conditions.

Fire Wounds

Offering skilled legal services for victims of serious burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Hospital Incompetence

Ensuring specialist legal representation for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Merchandise Responsibility

Managing cases involving unsafe products, delivering skilled legal assistance to clients affected by harmful products.

Senior Neglect

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall & Trip Occurrences

Adept in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking restitution for their harm.

Infant Wounds

Supplying legal help for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Accidents: Focused on helping victims of car accidents gain appropriate payout for damages and harm.

Motorbike Incidents

Expert in providing legal advice for bikers involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

18-Wheeler Crash

Providing adept legal advice for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for injuries.

Construction Accidents

Committed to defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Head Harms

Expert in offering expert legal services for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Injuries

Expertise in handling cases for victims who have suffered harms from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Jogger Mishaps

Committed to legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering recovery.

Unjust Loss

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and adept legal assistance to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Expert in representing individuals with backbone trauma, offering specialized legal guidance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​