...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Bicycle Accidents in Emden

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When navigating the complex aftermath of a bicycle accident, an expert attorney is indispensable in securing your rightful compensation. Carlson Bier has a stellar track record for such advocacy and safeguards vehicular accident victims with deftness. With long-standing experience that stretches across Illinois, including Emden, our firm offers qualified expertise in unraveling the multifaceted intricacies attached to personal injury cases linked with bicycling mishaps. Our skilled legal team unrelentingly fights to vindicate your rights against responsible parties and insurance companies often intent on minimizing their liabilities. As pioneers in this specialized field of law, we recognize every unique detail corresponding to bicycle safety laws pertinent to Emden cyclists specifically as well as broadly across Illinois — we leverage this nuanced awareness vigilantly for maximum results. By choosing Carlson Bier as your representatives following a cycling incident, you’re setting course towards assured justice underscored by personalized service & unwavering commitment; envision us not just serving clients from Emden or throughout Illinois- consider us architecting pathways tailored towards accorded justice anywhere it’s warranted within state confines.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Emden Illinois

The Carlson Bier law firm, an established Illinois-based team of skilled personal injury attorneys, has developed an unshakable reputation for providing comprehensive services in various realms of personal injury cases with Bicycle Accidents being a vital area of focus. Alongside our relentless pursuit for justice, we believe that knowledge is power – hence equipping you with sufficient understanding on the matter serves as a substantial underpinning to achieving credible outcomes.

Bicycle accidents occur more frequently than most anticipate and those instances can result is severe injuries that extend beyond scratches and bruises. Having years of professional experience dealing these specific types of cases, we echo the importance of knowing your rights as a cyclist on Illinoian roads. To achieve this, we’ve outlined key factors pertaining to the concept:

• Rights and Duties: Under Illinois laws, bicyclists are given the same rights and duties applicable to drivers of any other vehicle. This implies that while cyclists ought to abide by traffic regulations, they’re equally eligible for protection from harm caused by others’ negligence.

• Common Causes: Understanding common causes such as vehicle collisions due to driver’s negligence or trespassing bicycle lanes can help cyclists stay vigilant leading to possible prevention.

• Appropriate Legal Recourse: Owing to each case’s unique nature and complexity level; suitable legal recourse varies – ranging from compensation claim for medical bills or claiming damages against negligent drivers.

• Importance Aren’t Necessarily Small Claims: Depending upon the accident circumstances, settlements can venture into thousands or millions.

With Carlson Bier at your side you’re not just leveraging indomitable legal assistance but also thoughtful guidance about when consulting attorney becomes necessary following a bicycle accident. Filing personal injury claims become essential if you’ve sustained serious injuries requiring costly medical attention or lost wages due to inability work post-accident.

A glimpse at situations necessitating consulting an attorney:

1) If third party liability insurance claim seems feasible

2) Formulating appropriate legal strategies to counter defense claims.

3) Whenever you are unsure about the nuances of negotiating with insurance companies.

We at Carlson Bier highlight one cardinal rule: Early consultation avoids legal pitfalls. Connect with us as soon as possible post-accident, enabling us to provide optimal assistance during those initial critical moments where insurance companies might want to minimise or evade their liability.

Towards making process smoother for our clients, we offer free case evaluation services – helping victims comprehend on whether they qualify for compensation. Every claim comes accompanied by a Statute of Limitations which indicates that lawsuit should be filed within an established timeframe since the injury occurred or was discovered. In Illinois typically it’s 2 years from accident date but exceptions do exist depending upon certain criteria such distinguishing adults from minors.

Choosing Carlson Bier as your personal injury attorney in bicycle accidents ensures you tap into deep knowledge pool, meticulous attention towards understanding each client’s unique concerns and unwavering commitment for securing just restitution that reflects true scale of loss endured by victims. For someone who has recently incurred such losses trust us with turning this trying phase into an opportunity for striking back at injustices meted out inadvertently by system loopholes.

In conclusion, knowledge coupled with measured legal advice is step one in the direction of obtaining rightful resolution. Ready to take charge of your situation? Click on the button below and let’s define what winning means to you starting with gauging how much your case can potentially claim ensuring favorable outcomes! Carve a new path today by empowering yourself through informed choices guided expertly by Illinois-based team at Carlson Bier law firm. Ignite possibilities now!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Emden Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Emden

Areas of Practice in Emden

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Proficient in legal advocacy for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or risky conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Offering adept legal advice for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or negligence.

Hospital Negligence

Ensuring specialist legal services for persons affected by physician malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Accountability

Addressing cases involving unsafe products, supplying professional legal help to customers affected by faulty goods.

Aged Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip & Stumble Injuries

Expert in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking redress for their harm.

Newborn Wounds

Providing legal aid for loved ones affected by medical malpractice resulting in infant injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Incidents: Focused on helping clients of car accidents get reasonable remuneration for injuries and losses.

Scooter Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal support for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Trucking Crash

Delivering specialist legal assistance for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just claims for harms.

Construction Site Incidents

Engaged in assisting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Head Harms

Committed to extending professional legal support for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Harms

Expertise in addressing cases for individuals who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Crashes

Focused on legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Passing

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and adept legal representation to ensure redress.

Vertebral Impairment

Focused on assisting persons with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal support to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​