...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Emden

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with the aftermath of a dog bite injury in Emden, it is essential to have proficient legal guidance. That’s where Carlson Bier comes into play – an esteemed personal injury lawyer firm rooted in Illinois with expertise in handling such cases effectively. Our seasoned attorneys understand how traumatic these incidents can be and strive tirelessly to ensure victims receive necessary compensation. With our meticulous knowledge of Illinois dog bite law, we aid you through the complicated process while ensuring complete legal compliance. We’ve earned recognition for consistently securing favorable verdicts, instilling confidence that your case is handled adeptly by reliable professionals who prioritize clients’ needs above all else.

Choosing Carlson Bier means opting for knowledgeable lawyers committed to reputable advocacy—offering profound insights gained from years of experience representing similar cases across Illinois—including Emden-related dog bite injuries. Although every case is unique, our dedicated approach remains consistent: fighting relentlessly on behalf your rights and ensuring justice served!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Emden Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are dedicated to providing legal assistance and representation for individuals who have suffered personal injuries. A significant focus of our practice revolves around helping victims of dog bite incidents navigate the often complex legal landscape to seek rightful compensation. Based in the heart of Illinois, our seasoned team brings together a wealth of experience, intricate knowledge of personal injury law, and an unwavering commitment to pursuing justice on behalf of our clients.

Dog bites can lead to severe injuries that may require immediate and ongoing medical attention. By their very nature, such incidents can result in physical trauma including lacerations, puncture wounds or broken bones. In addition to possible infections that could set in following such attacks – rabies being among the most well-known yet not exhaustive list. In extreme circumstances, plastic surgery might be required to effectively address subsequent disfigurement.

Moreover, traumatic encounters like these harbor an often-underestimated potential for causing significant psychological distress too; confrontations with aggressive dogs can leave deep emotional scars far outlasting visible wounds. This includes disorders like post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety issues and related conditions that could hamper everyday life if left untreated.

Key aspects concerning Dog Bite Injury cases include:

– Strict Liability: Illinois follows the strict liability doctrine when it comes to dog bite cases which holds owners directly accountable for any injuries caused by their pets.

– Negligence claims: If the owner was aware of his/her pet’s violent tendencies but failed in restraining it from attacking, negligence claims hold good.

– Statute limitations: In Illinois, you generally have two years from the date 
of injury to file a lawsuit based on a personal injury claim.

The funds garnered through successful litigation don’t just cushion against financial blows arising from sky-high hospital bills; they offer sufferers some semblance of closure and peace when wrangling through arduous recovery processes marred by painful memories. Our expertly curated strategies strive to bring maximum restitution, ensuring future medical costs and mental health treatment are well covered along with losses incurred due to inability to earn during rehabilitation periods.

Despite suffering through such harrowing experiences, many victims hesitate in pursuing legal action often due to the misconception of burdensome expenses. This is where Carlson Bier steps in. Understanding our client’s needs stands paramount for us hence we operate on a contingency fee basis. In simple terms, we charge no upfront fees; our compensation comes only from the settlement or verdict achieved through successful representation. It’s this commitment laced with robust professionalism that sets us apart as an acutely client-centric law firm of choice.

Since every case has its own unique facts and elements, it is absolutely critical to have your specific situation reviewed by professional attorneys with a specialty in dog bite injuries – like we have at Carlson Bier. Tackling each case with utmost dedication, agility, and meticulousness, we consistently endeavor towards driving valuable outcomes for those grappling with the consequences of unforeseen animal attacks.

Rest assured, when you choose Carlson Bier as your legal advocate following a traumatic incident such as a dog bite attack,you align yourself with profound expertise and unyielding pursuit of justice which ensures compelling representation aimed at securing optimal compensation suited best for your comprehensive recovery.

Now that you’ve armed yourselves with vital insights regarding Dog Bite Injuries under Illinois Law and acquainted yourselves with how Carlson Bier could potentially make a difference given their zealous focus on personal injury claims – isn’t it time you took stock of where things lie? Dispelling doubts surrounding potential payouts stemming from lawsuits constitutes an essential step in this journey towards healing. Waiting down below is exactly what you need — Button marked ‘Find Out How Much Your Case Is Worth’. Go ahead! Click,it might just open up pathways leading towards much-deserved relief & fortuity seldom considered possible post facing such adversity.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Emden Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Emden

Areas of Practice in Emden

Cycling Collisions

Focused on legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Providing specialist legal help for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Medical Misconduct

Extending experienced legal assistance for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Obligation

Dealing with cases involving dangerous products, delivering expert legal guidance to customers affected by harmful products.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring protection.

Fall & Stumble Injuries

Expert in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking recovery for their suffering.

Neonatal Traumas

Offering legal aid for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Crashes: Focused on assisting individuals of car accidents secure equitable recompense for damages and harm.

Motorcycle Accidents

Focused on providing legal advice for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

Big Rig Accident

Delivering adept legal support for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just claims for injuries.

Construction Site Mishaps

Committed to representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Impairments

Specializing in delivering specialized legal assistance for persons suffering from head injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Damages

Skilled in handling cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Accidents

Focused on legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Undeserved Fatality

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and experienced legal support to ensure compensation.

Neural Injury

Specializing in defending persons with backbone trauma, offering specialized legal guidance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​