FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Emden

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When unfortunate pedestrian accidents occur in Emden, Illinois, Carlson Bier is the dependable law firm that steps in with unmatched expertise and professionalism. Our proven track record exhibits our capability to handle complex personal injury cases efficiently and deliver results beyond expectation. At Carlson Bier, we advocate relentlessly for victim’s rights while ensuring they receive fair compensation to cover their medical bills, lost wages, and pain or trauma suffered. Pedestrian accident legal ramifications can be complicated; however, our team possesses a deep knowledge base on Illinois state laws governing such cases providing clients peace of mind during challenging times. As skilled negotiators with a critical eye for details vital for case progression towards favorable outcomes – trust your situation within the competent hands at Carlson Bier—for us every client matters whether from bustling Chicago or quaint Emden town—and every encounter aims to make you feel heard and valued because your recovery remains our ultimate mission.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Emden Illinois

At Carlson Bier, as experienced personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, we understand the intricacies and complexities of pedestrian accidents. Pedestrian accidents occur when an individual walking or running is struck by a motor vehicle. Often resulting in significant injuries or even fatalities, these incidences are unfortunately common occurrences on our state’s roads.

Understanding the nature and dynamics of pedestrian accidents is key to navigating the ensuing legal process. Negligence often plays a central role in these incidents. In many cases, drivers fail to yield right-of-way to pedestrians at crosswalks or intersections; they may be distracted due to mobile phone usage, or driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs.

Key factors surrounding upholding safety laws for pedestrians include:

• Drivers must stop for pedestrians within a marked crosswalk.

• Drivers should never overtake vehicles stopped at crosswalks as these could be yielding way to crossing pedestrians.

• At non-intersection locations, vehicles have the right of way.

• When sidewalks are unavailable, pedestrians should walk on the left side of roads facing traffic.

Despite these established guidelines designed with public safety in mind unacceptable instances of pedestrian-related harm still persist. That’s where we come into play: providing compassionate representation and going above and beyond in pursuit of achieving justice for our clients who have suffered as victims of such negligence.

We deeply empathize with our clients who have found themselves burdened with high medical costs, long-term health complications, loss of income due to an inability work post-accident among other issues connected to their ordeal. Our commitment goes beyond just courtroom victories; we strive tirelessly towards enabling recovery both physically and financially for our clients.

In terms of seeking compensation after enduring hardship caused by a pedestrian accident, it’s important to note that every case is unique. It’s our mission at Carlson Bier not only to guide you step-by-step through this complex process but also diligently maximize your entitled compensation while safeguarding your rights.

In the immediate aftermath of a pedestrian accident remember to:

• Ensure safety by moving out of traffic, if possible.

• Call 911.

• Seek medical attention regardless of the apparent severity of injuries.

• Remain at the scene until law enforcement arrives and cooperatively answer their questions.

• Document personal recollection about incident details as accurately as possible including photos or videos, if feasible.

• Never admit fault at the scene under any circumstances.

We believe it’s crucial that victims understand these steps. However, this information should not replace professional legal advice. Remember your advocates at Carlson Bier are here specifically to lend our expertise in such dire situations.

Collaborating with us ensures assertive protection against insurance companies who often attempt minimizing claims or even denying them altogether. Rest assured knowing that every decision made during representation will be informed to pool strategies best designed towards winning your case thereby ensuring needed compensation for recovery and restoration.

Navigating post-accident complexities can undoubtedly be overwhelming; at Carlson Bier we make it our utmost endeavor transforming an understandably difficult time into a carefully guided process effectively relieving you from mounting pressures letting you focus solely on healing.

Take control over your situation today by clicking on the button below. Let’s start exploring how much your case is worth together because you very well deserve exacting full justice! Remember, we’re dedicated to delivering what’s right meaning results signaling rectification and repair of invisible damages inflicted upon unsuspected lives sooner than later! Our mission remains unfazed: Commitment, compassion and care because exactly while defending for those unable defending themselves justice always prevails!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Emden Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Emden

Areas of Practice in Emden

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Expert in legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Scald Traumas

Extending professional legal support for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Physician Malpractice

Ensuring professional legal support for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Commodities Fault

Addressing cases involving dangerous products, supplying adept legal assistance to clients affected by harmful products.

Senior Misconduct

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Fall & Fall Incidents

Professional in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal services to victims seeking redress for their injuries.

Infant Injuries

Extending legal aid for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Mishaps

Mishaps: Focused on helping victims of car accidents receive appropriate remuneration for damages and losses.

Motorbike Collisions

Expert in providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Big Rig Incident

Delivering adept legal advice for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for hurts.

Construction Site Collisions

Concentrated on assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Cognitive Harms

Expert in offering expert legal representation for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Harms

Expertise in tackling cases for victims who have suffered harms from dog attacks or animal assaults.

Jogger Accidents

Focused on legal support for joggers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering recovery.

Unwarranted Loss

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and experienced legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Backbone Harm

Dedicated to defending victims with spinal cord injuries, offering professional legal support to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​