FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Emden

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a spinal cord injury can turn life upside down. In these challenging times, ensure you have top-tier legal representation in Emden by choosing Carlson Bier, an esteemed Illinois Personal Injury Attorney group particularly proficient in handling Spinal Cord Injuries cases. Known for their thorough understanding of the complexities surrounding such issues and dedicated approach, Carlson Bier takes pride in advising clients with compassion and consideration – always putting your interests first. Attentively navigating every detail of your case, they fight tirelessly to achieve just outcomes. Incisive legal strategies tailored specifically for Spinal Cord Injury sufferers provide the best possible chance at compensation that truly reflects their pain and loss. Unlike many law firms who prioritize volumes over quality service, Carlson Bier dedicates time necessary to understand personal stories behind each claim – enhancing chances of success significantly more than generic methodologies could hope to accomplish; making them optimal choice when seeking experienced representation regarding Spinal Cord Injuries within Emden’s jurisdiction.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Emden Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury and have built a solid reputation as fierce advocates for victims of spinal cord injuries. As experienced attorneys based in Illinois, our legal team uses their extensive knowledge and practical insights to fight relentlessly for justice on behalf of our clients.

Spinal cord injuries can result not only in significant physical harm but also often present a myriad of emotional challenges and financial stress. These injuries occur when there is any damage to the spinal cord that blocks communication between the brain and the body, leading to long-term complications that drastically affect one’s quality of life.

Here are key details to consider regarding such an injury:

– The severity: Spinal cord injuries range from incomplete, where some sensory or motor function below the injured area remains intact, to complete, where all functioning is lost.

– Causes: Most commonly caused by accidents like auto collisions, severe falls, sporting incidents or violent encounters.

– Long-term effects: Besides loss or reduced mobility; individuals may experience secondary conditions including respiratory difficulties, bladder inconsistencies among others.

Understanding these essential factors helps provide perspective on how devastating this form of personal injury can be.

Our dedicated legal team at Carlson Bier has extensive insight into intricacies involved in such cases and follows a comprehensive approach when representing victims of spinal cord injuries. We diligently gather substantial evidence against the party at fault while ensuring your medical expenses are accurately calculated in line with future costs implied by lifestyle adjustments necessitated by your condition. At the same time, our empathetic staff provides support while navigating through this challenging period veering you towards light during dark moments.

We believe it’s important you understand statutes encompassing personal injury laws within Illinois jurisdiction – specifically ones pertaining to spinal cord injuries. Our state abides by modified comparative negligence rule which constitutes that if you’re found partially responsible for your accident; your compensation would be reduced in proportionality. A statute limitation also exists indicating that claims must be filed within 2 years from the date of injury thus acting promptly taking legal action is vital.

Carlson Bier’s goal is to ensure victims of spinal cord injuries receive appropriate compensation for their suffering. These settlements help cover significant medical costs, lost wages due to incapacity to work, regain stability and strive towards a new normal encompassing their disabilities.

Don’t let your courage waiver in seeking justice. When you choose Carlson Bier, you’re choosing experienced attorney force prepared tirelessly striving towards achieving maximum compensation for your losses.

Navigating the path toward legal remedy may seem daunting; however our dedicated team consistently provide guidance steering you through complex laws mapping out digestible pathways enabling full comprehension every step of the journey.

We invite you now to take crucial next step in your quest for justice. Evaluate the potential value of your case with us by simply clicking on button below offering information around possible monetary settlement associated with your distinct circumstance. Begin this important journey today with Carlson Bier – Your committed partner advocating fair recompense ensuring brighter prospects breaking dawn on clouded aftermaths of unfortunate incidents involving spinal cord injuries.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Emden Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Emden

Areas of Practice in Emden

Bicycle Accidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or risky conditions.

Scald Traumas

Giving skilled legal advice for people of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Clinical Carelessness

Delivering experienced legal representation for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving defective products, offering adept legal services to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring protection.

Fall & Tumble Injuries

Professional in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking redress for their damages.

Infant Wounds

Offering legal help for families affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Car Mishaps

Accidents: Focused on aiding patients of car accidents gain appropriate settlement for hurts and impairment.

Bike Mishaps

Specializing in providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

18-Wheeler Accident

Delivering experienced legal advice for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for hurts.

Worksite Mishaps

Dedicated to supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Head Injuries

Focused on offering dedicated legal services for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Damages

Adept at dealing with cases for clients who have suffered traumas from dog bites or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Focused on legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Unfair Fatality

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and adept legal support to ensure justice.

Neural Harm

Committed to supporting persons with backbone trauma, offering professional legal support to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440