...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Enfield

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re in Enfield and have experienced a dog bite injury, the expertise of Carlson Bier could be invaluable to your situation. As Illinois-based personal injury attorneys, we specialize in representing victims of dog bites. Dog bite injuries can result in significant financial burdens due to medical expenses and lost income during recovery. Moreover, these incidents often lead to emotional trauma that should not be underestimated or overlooked. At Carlson Bier, we aggressively fight for your right to compensation as per Illinois law. We possess an intricate understanding of these complex legalities which enables us to strategize effectively on behalf of our clients. Our team is dedicated to providing exceptional representation while prioritizing open communication and empathy throughout the course of each case’s genuinely personalized service delivery process because at Carlson Bier we believe every victim deserves their day justice.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Enfield Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are esteemed to acknowledge our expertise as personal injury attorneys in Illinois. A key area under our portfolio covers Dog Bite Injuries, a unfortunately common event that echoes traumatizing consequences for victims. These incidents not only result in physical pain but often lead to emotional distress and financial burdens. We believe it’s essential for everyone to understand their rights and the legal pathway should they become victims of such unfortunate circumstances.

Dog bite injuries can range from superficial skin wounds to severe life-threatening injuries or infections caused by bacteria present in the animal’s mouth. The severity of such incidents underscores why you need proficient lawyers like ourselves at Carlson Bier who maintain an up-to-date knowledge base on this niche within personal injury law.

– Illinois has specific laws concerning dog bites: According to state law, a dog owner is liable if their dog attacks without provocation while the person is conducting themselves peacefully in any place where they may lawfully be.

– Timeframe matters: Our state provides two years from the date of harm for filing a lawsuit involving personal injuries including dog bites. Prolonged delay could foreclose your chances entirely due to statutes’ limitations.

– You could be compensated: Depending on individual case details, you could potentially recover costs of medical bills, lost wages if unable work during recovery period, damages pertaining to pain and suffering among others with expert representation.

Our team at Carlson Bier tailors every dog bite incident case uniquely after thorough review and analysis as no two cases are identical – each having its own specificity requiring personalized litigation approach from experienced legal professionals such as ours.

We also cater heavy emphasis towards educating our clients during free consultations so they have clear understanding about complexities involved which range from investigating premise liability (wherein owners of premises where dogs dwell might bear responsibility) down streamlining compensation claims vis-a-vis negligent parties thereby ensuring optimal outcomes through meticulous strategizing based upon proficiency built over years across diverse dynamic scenarios hence making us premier choice for representation during such stressful times.

Moreover, being victim of dog bite does not only involve tackling physical toll but it also brings associated psychological impacts that might have long term effects impacting quality of life. With Carlson Bier by your side, we assure to take steps towards comprehensive recovery including monetary compensation for mental anguish and associated emotional turbulence along with covering medical costs thereby playing significant role in bringing lives back on track post-incident.

Lastly, taking into account the trauma you have endured due to a dog bite injury – we wish to extend our support beyond just legal guidance. Our commitment lies in advocating tirelessly for your best interests and ensuring you receive the just compensation you deserve. To assess the significant worthiness of your case, click the button below without any obligation. Remember, time is crucial for obtaining fair redressal hence act promptly before this opportunity recedes given stringent statutes’ limitation constraints applicable under Illinois Law. The trusted team at Carlson Bier is ready to help – because when it comes to handling personal injuries caused by dog bites, every moment counts towards building a winning case strategy!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Enfield Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Enfield

Areas of Practice in Enfield

Bicycle Mishaps

Dedicated to legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Burn Wounds

Offering professional legal support for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Physician Incompetence

Providing specialist legal services for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Fault

Taking on cases involving problematic products, providing specialist legal assistance to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Neglect

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Trip & Stumble Accidents

Adept in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking restitution for their losses.

Neonatal Damages

Delivering legal help for kin affected by medical incompetence resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Crashes: Devoted to assisting individuals of car accidents gain equitable recompense for hurts and harm.

Motorbike Collisions

Committed to providing representation for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for losses.

Semi Incident

Delivering expert legal services for individuals involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for losses.

Building Incidents

Committed to assisting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Cerebral Traumas

Committed to offering specialized legal advice for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Injuries

Expertise in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or beast attacks.

Jogger Mishaps

Focused on legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Unjust Demise

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and expert legal assistance to ensure fairness.

Spinal Cord Injury

Dedicated to supporting patients with spinal cord injuries, offering dedicated legal support to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​