...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Equality

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Have you, or someone close to you, been affected by a dog bite injury in Equality? At Carlson Bier, we understand the gravity of such situations. We specialize in working with victims of dog bites and helping them navigate through complex legal processes for compensation. As experienced Dog Bite Injuries attorneys based in Illinois, our team has amassed vast expertise and insight into dealing with animal-related offense laws that are frequently evolving and diversifying.

Our committed approach is centered around fighting tenaciously for your rights while offering compassionate assistance during these trying times. What sets us apart at Carlson Bier is our wealth of experience – dedicated solely to personal injury lawsuits pertaining to Dog Bite Incidents. Our attorney group profoundly comprehends Illinois law nuances related to such incidents terrior-specific regulations which allows us to provide expert counsel tailored precisely for your situation.

Don’t face this grueling ordeal alone; get the trusted representation that only Carlson Bier can provide. Reach out today – let’s discuss how we can mitigate damage together.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Equality Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in a wide scope of personal injury law practices covering all corners of Illinois. Our commitment to understanding the specifics of your case and particular realm of law equates to direct, personalized guidance for you. One such area that often goes unnoticed but is vitally important regards dog bite injuries.

A major part of our responsibility as your designated lawyer involves educating you about the details surrounding your situation. With this information at hand, you can make informed decisions with clarity and confidence. Dog bites may seem straightforward on the surface, but there are several aspects involved in these types of cases.

Firstly, it’s crucial to understand that owners can be held liable if their pet inflicts harm or injury onto others unprovoked – especially when they have knowledge of their dog’s aggressive tendencies. This typically falls under what’s called ‘strict liability.’ If a dog owner has been negligent by not following leash laws or failed to control the animal in situations where an attack could occur, they might be held liable for damages caused by their pets.

A significant point worth mentioning is ‘stay statute,’ part of the Illinois Animal Control Act which sets out rules relating to injuries inflicted by dogs. As per this act, if a person sustains injuries due to an unprovoked attack or assault by someone else’s dog while they were conducting themselves peacefully and were rightfully on public property (or lawful private premises), the individual has the right to obtain full compensation from the owner or keeper responsible for that canine.

Should a lawsuit be necessary after trying different settlement options explicitly provided under this law , plaintiffs need demonstrating key factors:

– The defendant owned the dog.

– The plaintiff was conducting himself peacefully.

– The plaintiff did not provoke the dog.

-Time and location being either on public property or was legally present on private premises during assault/attack

Obtaining medical records detailing any physical cruelty endured will prove beneficial in court along with photographs and documentation of related medical bills.

Emotional distress is another facet to consider in dog bite lawsuits. The mental trauma inflicted by these experiences can be long-lasting, affecting one’s overall quality of life substantially. Loss of earning capacity is a critical point too – if the attack resulted in such physical or psychological impairment that the victim could no longer work as effectively or at all.

While operating within Illinois, it should be noted we definitely care about locales large and small throughout state boundaries but Carlson Bier does not have any physical offices located in Equality for transparent clarity sake.

Dog bites are more than just an unfortunate incident; they can lift heavy tolls emotionally, physically, and financially— leading sometimes to severe consequences which need addressing legally for justice’s rightful action. Having a knowledgeable personal injury attorney such as those at Carlson Bier on your side increases prospects exponentially towards successful case outcomes duly noted& apprised if sought after.

Navigating through legal complexities around dog bite injuries can understandably be daunting but seeking rightful restitution becomes immeasurably manageable with our skilled team guiding your path to justice closely.

So what next? To obtain insights into how much compensation you may rightfully claim on account for sustained harm due these canine encounters , click the button below. Rest assured you’re taking substantial steps toward a decisive victory armed with indispensable knowledge pooled from years of experience the attorneys at Carlson Bier possess .

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Equality Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Equality

Areas of Practice in Equality

Bike Collisions

Specializing in legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or perilous conditions.

Thermal Damages

Extending professional legal advice for people of major burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Medical Misconduct

Delivering experienced legal support for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Responsibility

Addressing cases involving faulty products, providing specialist legal support to customers affected by defective items.

Elder Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble and Fall Mishaps

Specialist in dealing with tumble accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking recovery for their injuries.

Neonatal Wounds

Extending legal assistance for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Collisions: Committed to helping clients of car accidents receive fair settlement for harms and destruction.

Motorcycle Incidents

Expert in providing legal advice for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Semi Accident

Offering experienced legal representation for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for hurts.

Construction Site Incidents

Focused on advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Brain Damages

Dedicated to extending expert legal advice for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Traumas

Adept at dealing with cases for clients who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Focused on legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Fatality

Striving for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and experienced legal services to ensure restitution.

Neural Damage

Specializing in advocating for persons with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal representation to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer