FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Essex

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In all corners of the great city of Essex, dog owners and their neighbors cohabitate in peace. However, unfortunate incidents like dog bite injuries can disrupt this harmony. A mishap could happen to anyone: an innocent child on a playground or a committed postal worker fulfilling their duties. When faced with such distressing events, it’s essential you receive just compensation for medical bills and emotional trauma caused by dog bite injuries.

Carlson Bier Law Firm emerges as the superior choice in these circumstances because our Illinois-based team is highly skilled at handling personal injury cases specifically related to Dog Bite Injuries, possessing extensive knowledge about the statutes governing these situations across different locales including Essex.

Plateaus are alien concepts to us at Carlson Bier; we ceaselessly build upon our expertise which positions us favorably against our counterparts as we comprehensively represent victims who may find legal labyrinths intimidating post-trauma. We assertively advocate for your rights backed up with formidable litigation capabilities so you walk away feeling vindicated.

The need for action could become paramount in your journey towards justice after suffering from a shocking incident like a dog bite injury – Choose Carlson Bier; choose competence and compassion combined into an unrivaled partnership that strives for complete client satisfaction.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Essex Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are dedicated to ensuring that victims of dog bite injuries get the justice they deserve. We understand how traumatic these incidents can be, and we aim to alleviate stress by providing professional personal injury attorney services in Illinois. When confronted with a dog bite situation, many people are unsure about their rights and what legal measures can be taken towards resolution. As experienced professionals, it’s our job to shed light on these matters.

Dog bites pose serious harm — physically, emotionally, and financially. Injuries can range from minor punctures or severe lacerations requiring complex medical treatment; emotionally – trauma could lead to anxiety or fears especially toward animals which might impact everyday life; financially – unpaid work leave for recovery, excessive medical bills among others. It is critical that dog owners are held liable for damages caused by their pets through compliance with Illinois’ strict liability statute regarding dog bites.

This law states that if a dog injures someone unprovoked while the person is legally allowed on the property where the incident occurred, the owner becomes liable for any damages incurred. Damages may include medical bills resulting from treating your injuries such as doctor’s visits, hospital stays or surgeries; lost wages if you miss work due to treatments/recovery time alongside damage assessment addressing pain and suffering along with emotional distress linked to the encounter.

However, hold note of two important exceptions wherein one cannot file a claim: trespassing (illegal invasion) onto privately owned premises without consent/supportive backing of law concerning premise occupation irrespective whether bitten/otherwise injured by an animal present there OR provoking an animal into attacking through aggressive actions and behaviors contradictory of general public protocol translating into similar outcomes mentioned earlier noting responsible party alterations under these circumstances opposing originally stated regulations attributing pet-owner responsibility within ordinary scenario events.

Of course navigating legal waters independently seems daunting hence always advise seeking expertise opinion – enter Carlson Bier at this juncture! Not only well-versed in dog bite injuries and their legal implications, but we also have vast experience negotiating with insurance companies to ensure you get the compensation you deserve, not to forget representing clients in court when necessary. Each case is unique; therefore, your representation should be customized to meet your specific needs.

Precisely due to this belief, we offer a free consultation – an opportunity for us critically assessing incident details forming subsequent course actions including lawsuit filing if eligible; insurance company negotiation tactics encompassing fair settlement offers R.F.A / counteroffer strategy associated concept benefits concerning potential alternative dispute resolution pathways promoting best possible scenario outputs targeting top-tier compensatory retributions justifiable through proven evidence submission extensively focusing on maximal client benefit deliverance regularly observed!

At Carlson Bier, our clients’ rights and welfare are our priority. We work tirelessly toward securing legally fair compensation for dog bite victims under Illinois law sectors while emphasizing personal attention throughout entire process frameworks via clear communication lines respecting individual requisites firmly reinforcing standpoints echoing justice deliverance underscoring deserved party mandates associable proportionality obligations demanding equitable jurisdictional implementations translating into realistically applicable concept embodiments.

To assess your claim’s legal stance minus obligation commitments indicating variable result reassurances impossible guaranteeing at preliminary stages necessitating further investigative analyses exploring valid substantiation retrievable data support evidencing argued justice righteousness — utilize online feature made available reflecting expertise hires commitment towards enhanced user convenience making information accessibility hassle-free instantaneously practical regardless geographical limitation barriers restricting conventional office visits thereby demonstrating modern practice adaptation abilities showcasing forward-thinking attitude hence I encourage clicking button below ascertain value subdivision directly aligning experienced attorney schedule free consultation displaying inquiry guidance determination outlay perspective extension highlighting credible potential results comparatively benchmarked standards relevant discipline topics conclusively linking aspired-achieved objectives consistently! Remember – If it involves personal injury liability revolving around dog bites specifically – Think Carlson Bier: Diligence Personified.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Essex Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Essex

Areas of Practice in Essex

Cycling Incidents

Expert in legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' negligence or unsafe conditions.

Scald Wounds

Extending skilled legal services for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Clinical Malpractice

Providing dedicated legal advice for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Fault

Managing cases involving defective products, delivering expert legal help to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble and Stumble Incidents

Skilled in handling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking restitution for their losses.

Childbirth Traumas

Offering legal aid for kin affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Collisions: Focused on supporting patients of car accidents get appropriate remuneration for harms and losses.

Bike Incidents

Expert in providing legal assistance for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for losses.

Big Rig Mishap

Offering adept legal services for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for injuries.

Construction Site Incidents

Dedicated to assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or recklessness.

Head Injuries

Specializing in providing specialized legal support for patients suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Wounds

Specialized in addressing cases for people who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or animal assaults.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Focused on legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Unwarranted Death

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and expert legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Spine Injury

Specializing in assisting individuals with paralysis, offering specialized legal support to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440