Medical Malpractice Attorney in Eureka

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with medical malpractice issues in Eureka, it’s crucial to engage a trusted and proficient legal partner to represent your interests. The distinguished Carlson Bier law firm is renowned for its expertise in personal injury law and excels markedly within the realm of medical malpractice cases. Our knowledgeable attorneys impose their comprehensive understanding of these complex matters vehemently while representing clients who have suffered from negligent health care providers. We prioritize our client’s needs, ensuring they are thoroughly informed throughout each stage of the process. In Eureka’s vast sea of litigation possibilities, Carlson Bier stands as an experienced beacon offering obstacle management for troubled waters inherent within medical malpractice claims. Winning favorable outcomes on behalf of those damaged by healthcare negligence underscores why we rank among the top considerations when seeking a formidable advocate to unravel delicate intricacies anchored around such challenging cases. For dedicated resilience and insightful direction handling your unique circumstances related to medical malpractices, engaging Carlson Bier cultivates confidence that you are making an optimal choice for competent representation.

About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Eureka Illinois

Carlson Bier, a premier personal injury attorney group based in Illinois, is fundamentally committed to assisting victims of medical malpractice. As an expert legal team in this challenging field, we strive to impart valuable knowledge enhancing your understanding of this critical area and guiding you through its tricky terrain with confidence.

Medical malpractice pertains to situations where healthcare professionals deviate from the proven standards of care and cause harm or injury to patients. The elucidation of it can be highly complex, thus we aim at breaking down these complexities for you in the simplest way.

• There’s negligence: Firstly, for a situation to qualify as medical malpractice, there must be proof that a medical practitioner acted negligently. This means their conduct fell below the acceptable standard of care compared with other reasonably competent practitioners in their field under similar circumstances.

• It caused injury/harm: It’s not enough just proving negligence though, one should also establish that their injuries were directly attributed to this act or omission by the healthcare provider.

• Significant damages resulted: Furthermore, one must show that substantial harm resulted from this negligent behavior such as disability or loss of income; extreme pain/suffering; or significant past and future medical bills.

Demonstrating all three elements collectively tends to be rarely possible without professional help – which is where Carlson Bier steps into your journey towards justice. Our qualified team has years-long experience investigating and litigating these cases on behalf of victims who deserve reparation due to such unexpected medical errors.

The most common types of medical malpractice include misdiagnosis/delayed diagnosis, surgical errors, medication mistakes among others – knowing about them helps respurcefully approach any unfortunate occurrence like these.

• Misdiagnosis/Delayed Diagnosis: Mistakes concerning diagnosis can severely impact a patient’s chances for recovery.

• Surgical Errors: These might entail performing inappropriate procedure/surgery or leaving surgical instruments inside patients’ bodies post surgery, both leading to devastating consequences.

• Medication Errors: These include prescribing wrong medication or incorrect dosage; potentially being lethal in severe cases.

Pursuing medical malpractice claims is often riddled with legislatively and practically challenging bewilderments. Period of limitations, adherence to pre-lawsuit assessment rules and understanding a relatively intricate legislation about specific types of injuries could be dauntingly confounding for anyone without necessary legal skill-set – a sector where our vast expertise comes into distinctly helpful play at Carlson Bier.

Administrative law changes from time to time. Stay informed about these transformations along with knowing detailed specifics around your rights tied with them is cardinal – we make it possible by consistently updating our knowledge database and extending our assistance beyond case representation functions into proactive information dissemination endeavours for victims’ awareness-building.

In the quest toward justice against medical malpractice, you need more than just representation – you require an advocate who listens, supports, fights relentlessly while putting years of experience behind every strategic move designed in pursuit of the right compensation for you. That’s what essentially comprises the Carlson Bier approach relying on persistence, compassion entwined into solid professional acumen striding forward together with you in this legal battle.

Processing through all phases associated with a medical malpractice case can leave one feeling overwhelmed and mentally drained amid already physically challenging times. Thus, let us step up to lighten that burden as your proud representatives imbued with unreserved commitment towards safeguarding your rights and procuring apt reparation warranted by your situation.

Why wait? Unravel instantly the monetary worth obscured behind complexities encircling your case now! Give way to discovering firsthand how effective guidance tethered to authentic concern offered by Carlson Bier empowers winning justified compensation reflecting precise value corresponding optimally asset-wise regarding potential damages inflicted upon you due of said instances. Click the button below now! Allow us at Carlson Bier distill out what precisely you are entitled to – the rightful compensation you potentially possess lawsuit-wise.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Eureka Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Eureka

Areas of Practice in Eureka

Bicycle Crashes

Proficient in legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Flame Traumas

Extending professional legal assistance for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Physician Malpractice

Ensuring specialist legal representation for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Commodities Accountability

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, providing professional legal guidance to consumers affected by harmful products.

Senior Mistreatment

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble & Stumble Injuries

Skilled in dealing with trip accident cases, providing legal support to victims seeking justice for their damages.

Infant Wounds

Supplying legal help for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Incidents: Concentrated on guiding clients of car accidents secure reasonable remuneration for hurts and impairment.

Motorbike Accidents

Expert in providing legal assistance for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

Semi Mishap

Extending specialist legal assistance for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for hurts.

Building Collisions

Committed to defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Cognitive Damages

Dedicated to ensuring dedicated legal representation for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Traumas

Adept at tackling cases for clients who have suffered damages from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Specializing in legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Undeserved Passing

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and expert legal representation to ensure fairness.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Specializing in supporting victims with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal representation to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer