Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Eureka

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Navigating a pedestrian accident claim requires specialized legal expertise. Turn to Carlson Bier, the consummate professionals in this field, well-versed in Illinois’ pedestrians rights and laws. Drawing from our vast experience with personal injury law, we are equipped to present strong arguments for victims of such accidents navigating towards justified compensation. Our rigorous investigation meticulously assembles evidence from every possible angle: scrutinizing report details, interviewing witnesses and consulting industry experts to construct an impregnable case that advocates for your right to full restitution after a traumatic incident on foot.

We understand how devastating such events can be – the pain caused is not only physical but also manifests emotionally through anxiety about mounting medical bills or loss of work income; it’s why we tenaciously pursue fair settlements for our clients’ sake.

As personal injury lawyers working tirelessly towards justice – wherever you might be situated within Illinois state lines – rest assured that entrusting Carlson Bier with your Pedestrian Accident claims is choosing seasoned practice backed by demonstrable success records and unwavering dedication.

About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Eureka Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we pride ourselves in being a leading authority on personal injury law in Illinois. We have a specific focus and extensive experience within Pedestrian Accident cases. In these situations, the complexities that arise are unique and require in-depth knowledge to navigate properly.

Pedestrian accidents occur for numerous reasons. Some of the most significant causes include; distracted driving where a motorist fails to see you due to distractions such as texting or even eating while driving and drunk driving which typically leads to slowed reaction times, impaired judgment, or total loss of control. Other causes can be driver negligence like failing to stop at traffic lights or careless turning amongst others.

These accidents are distressing and often result in severe injuries like broken bones, spinal cord injuries, traumatic brain injuries, cut wounds, head injuries or sometimes even fatalities. These can be overwhelming both emotionally and financially with costs skyrocketing due to medical bills and lost wages.

Our duty at Carlson Bier is ensuring your rights as a victim are protected and upheld after suffering harm from such unfortunate incidents. To this effect:

• We provide consultations – This is critical because it helps us understand the specifics of your case hence customizing strategies tailored towards obtaining fair compensation.

• We conduct thorough investigations – Stone will not go unturned during our inquiries into the accident scene, police reports review plus interviewing witnesses amongst other actions meant for building up sufficient evidence supporting your claim.

• We handle all legal paperwork – The technicality involved while compiling forms is considerably tedious but indispensable towards securing your rightful compensation. As experienced attorneys, we’re skilled at streamlining this process eliminating unnecessary stress on you.

• Negotiations with insurance companies – After filing claims we negotiate rigorously pursuing optimal settlements for our clients. Should these discussions prove fruitless then court action follows closely wherein we dedicate our efforts till justice prevails.

When struggling with grief from accident aftermaths last thing one needs shouldering would be legal burdens. Fortunately, this is where our compassionate team steps in heartily doing everything required helping victims reclaim their lives.

At Carlson Bier we strive for responsive approaches to your legal needs. Unlike larger firms that occasionally juggle between cases at the expense of personal attention deserving for each client ours balances efficiently between quality representation and dedication towards every case.

We believe in transparency hence keeping clients informed on progress made throughout the litigation process. Additionally, we take up a considerable percentage of personal injury cases on contingency basis eliminating upfront payments until successful closure of your lawsuit. By engaging us you can rest assured knowing your attorney won’t get paid unless you do.

Remember, there are limits defined by Illinois statute laws within which you should file lawsuits related with pedestrian accidents failure to comply might dismiss your claim exclusively no matter how legit it sounds. Our proficient attorneys ensure compliance alongside requisite regulations thus safeguarding from possible technicalities jeopardizing successful compensation pursuit.

The time following such an accident can often feel overwhelming; medical appointments, physical recovery- yet amidst all these it’s crucial not forgetting potential financial recovery as well. This deserves immediate attention since waiting too long could significantly affect chances of obtaining rightful settlement meant offsetting economic strain arising after pedestrian accidents

Transform this traumatic experience into a pathway for seeking justice; let Carlson Bier, stand beside you providing unparalleled representation fighting relentlessly till victory day arrives.

Are you a victim of a pedestrian-related accident? You deserve compensation and justice as provided by law! Don’t shoulder this burden alone – leave your case’s particulars to us while focusing solely on healing and recuperation. Do click the button below now to obtain expert advice from our skilled attorneys regarding how much worth does your case pack– because at Carlson Bier every victim counts!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Eureka Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Eureka

Areas of Practice in Eureka

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Focused on legal representation for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or hazardous conditions.

Scald Damages

Offering specialist legal services for victims of grave burn injuries caused by accidents or carelessness.

Clinical Misconduct

Extending dedicated legal services for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Responsibility

Addressing cases involving defective products, extending adept legal services to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip & Trip Incidents

Professional in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking restitution for their losses.

Birth Wounds

Extending legal guidance for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Accidents: Devoted to assisting clients of car accidents obtain appropriate compensation for harms and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Committed to providing legal assistance for bikers involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

Big Rig Mishap

Providing adept legal advice for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful claims for damages.

Building Site Accidents

Focused on assisting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Brain Traumas

Dedicated to extending dedicated legal services for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Wounds

Expertise in tackling cases for individuals who have suffered harms from dog bites or animal assaults.

Jogger Accidents

Expert in legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Fatality

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and expert legal support to ensure fairness.

Backbone Injury

Expert in advocating for clients with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal services to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer