FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Eureka

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

For those involved in life-altering spinal cord injuries events within Eureka, you need the expertise of a firm well-versed in such specialized cases. Carlson Bier is your prime choice in aiding you towards justice and ideal compensation. Our seasoned team encompasses an unmatched depth of knowledge about unique challenges associated with spinal cord injuries claims. We strive to rigorously represent victims, easing their path through legal complexities while they focus primarily on recovery process.

Unparalleled understanding and commitment set us apart at Carlson Bier; we are dedicated to providing relentless advocacy for fair settlements or verdicts. Trusting us allows clients access to financial relief quicker following these incapacitating events – crucial for medical costs, rehabilitation needs, lost income provision and securing quality of life aspects impacted by the injury.

Countless successful results narrate our track record over decades; proof that Carlson Bier delivers outstanding legal representation particularly tailored for spinal cord injuries vicinity. Your satisfaction is paramount as we tirelessly navigate demanding avenues ensuring comprehensive service deliverance till final resolution!

Choose Carlson Bier: enable competent navigation through this tumultuous journey where genuine empathy meets aggressive litigation!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Eureka Illinois

Understanding the complexities and ramifications of spinal cord injuries can be a daunting task. Carlson Bier, an established Illinois law firm specializing in personal injury cases, offers expert knowledge and profound understanding about this severe form of injury. Committed to providing quality legal assistance for those affected by these life-changing incidents, we aim to educate our clients on the intricate details surrounding spinal cord injuries.

Spinal cord injuries are classified into two main categories -complete and incomplete- which dramatically affect your movement, sensation, or control over certain parts of your body. In complete type injuries, there is no function below the level of injury; both sides of the body are equally affected. On the other hand, with incomplete type injuries, some functionality remains below the primary level of injury.

Several factors influence how much damage a spinal cord injury may cause. These include:

– The point at which the spine was injured: Injuries higher up in the spine often result in more significant impairment compared to those lower down.

– The severity of the initial trauma: More forceful traumas often lead to more severe injuries.

– Any secondary complications that occur after the initial trauma: This could include infections or internal bleeding.

Carlson Bier has years of experience representing victims who have suffered from different types of spinal cord injuries resulting from various causes such as auto accidents, workplace accidents, medical malpractice and slip-and-fall incidents. Our adept team works assiduously to ensure our clients receive compensation they rightfully deserve for their medical expenses, pain and suffering, loss of income and future care costs.

Proving liability in a spinal chord lawsuit involves three critical steps:

– Establishing negligence: Through evidence collected about the accident incident can show whether another party’s negligence caused your injury.

– Proving causation: Medical records serve as proof that your health issues stem directly from your accident.

– Ascertain damages: It’s crucial to illustrate how you suffer due to past and future medical costs, lost wages, and pain.

At Carlson Bier, we recognize that spinal cord injuries can lead to a cascade of financial burdens due to medical bills, rehabilitative therapies along with emotional distress stemming from the impact on daily life activities.

Seeking legal recourse is not just about symptom alleviation but also includes rebuilding your life post-injury. The compassionate team at Carlson Bier holds an unwavering commitment to fight for rightful compensation for our clients’ losses and work tirelessly towards enabling them to forge new paths towards recovery.

Understanding your rights in such complex cases is essential – remember each case has unique aspects; thus seeking professional legal advice is recommended.

Your journey towards justice begins here at Carlson Bier. With unparalleled expertise and relentless dedication, we stand as formidable advocates in the realm of personal injury law. If you are dealing with a spinal cord injury unsure about your next course of action or curious about the possible value of your case – take the first crucial step. Click on the button below provide us with few details related to your situation. We will reach out shortly with evaluations pertaining to potential outcomes for your claim. Every setback bears an opportunity for comebacks; let Carlson Bier be your ally amid challenging times supporting you through and beyond obtaining monetary compensation but helping restore elements of everyday normalcy renegotiated amidst the aftermaths of spinal chord injury incidents.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Eureka Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Eureka

Areas of Practice in Eureka

Bike Incidents

Focused on legal support for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or hazardous conditions.

Burn Injuries

Offering adept legal support for sufferers of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or negligence.

Physician Negligence

Ensuring expert legal services for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, providing expert legal guidance to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Misconduct

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Slip and Tumble Mishaps

Expert in handling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking justice for their harm.

Infant Harms

Offering legal guidance for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Collisions

Accidents: Devoted to supporting clients of car accidents gain just settlement for harms and harm.

Motorcycle Crashes

Dedicated to providing representation for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for damages.

Truck Crash

Delivering professional legal advice for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for damages.

Worksite Collisions

Focused on defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or recklessness.

Head Harms

Specializing in extending specialized legal support for patients suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Wounds

Proficient in addressing cases for clients who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Dedicated to legal support for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Passing

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and professional legal guidance to ensure redress.

Backbone Harm

Specializing in supporting patients with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal representation to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​