FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Fairmont City

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with the significant aftermath of dog bite injuries, you want a formidable team by your side. Enter Carlson Bier, an esteemed personal injury lawyer firm in Illinois. We specialize in handling complex cases involving dog bite injuries effectively and strategically to secure justice for our clients. In Fairmont City, we have built an impeccable reputation because of our relentless pursuit for rightful compensation that reflects the full spectrum of damages endured by our clients – physical pain, emotional suffering and financial strain from medical bills. Our dedicated lawyers at Carlson Bier not only bring unrivaled experience but also undeniable compassion as they treat each client’s circumstance uniquely rather than a mere case number. By choosing us to legally represent you against landlords or owners of dogs causing such harm—we ensure meticulous investigation on every detail pertaining to Dog Bite Injuries which equips us to build an ironclad case favoring you! Solicit assistance from Carlson Bier—the right choice when dealing with Dog Bite Injuries—because justice matters!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Fairmont City Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our skilled team of personal injury attorneys specializes in an array of areas including the often overlooked, but serious issue of dog bite injuries. With years of experience practicing law in the state of Illinois, we are fully equipped and ready to help you navigate through such a traumatic event. As recognized experts in this area, we give utmost importance to ensuring our clients have comprehensive understanding about their rights and potential remedies when they become victims of dog bite incidents.

Dog bites can lead to severe injuries that might cause physical pain, emotional trauma, and financial burden due to medical expenses. In worst-case scenarios, it could even result in substantial scarring or disease transmission like Rabies or Tetanus.

There are several important aspects that everyone should know about dog bite laws in Illinois:

• The law imposes ‘strict liability’ on dog owners for injuries caused by their pets. Simply put, it doesn’t matter if the owner knew the dog was aggressive or not; they’ll be held responsible.

• This implies that as long as a person is legally on private property – either as an invitee or contractor – or while in a public setting when bitten by a dog without provocation, they have the right for compensation.

• Additionally, damages do not only cover medical bills but can include lost income from missing work during recovery periods and compensation for psychological distress.

However intricate these procedures may sound; rest assured you will not face them alone: Carlson Bier’s practiced lawyers will guide you throughout your case with expertise acquired over bouts of successful representations clarifying any legal jargon into simple English so that all details are easily comprehended.

No one should feel vulnerable after experiencing such a harrowing incident as being victimized by a negligent pet owner’s animal. At Carlson Bier it’s vital for us that our clients receive justice served on their behalf along with closure enabling them move forward with confidence knowing someone fought valiantly for their cause.

But remember, the success of your claim significantly depends on swift action. In Illinois, there is a general two-year statute of limitations for personal injury claims which includes dog bites. So, it’s crucial to seek legal advice promptly after such an incident has occurred to commune the path towards appropriate medical care and maximum compensation.

At Carlson Bier we do not merely work ‘for’ our clients; we endeavour to work ‘with’ them – maintaining transparent communication; providing strong representation and above all ensuring they feel valued every step along this journey.

We know that as you read through these lines scrolling down this page, countless questions may be filling your mind about the severity of an untoward incident that brought you here today seeking help. Don’t let uncertainty plague your peace anymore: click on the button below for a free case evaluation today. Find out how much your case could be worth without any further delay or obligations. Allow Carlson Bier’s proficient personal injury attorneys unite forces with you in claiming back what is rightfully yours – Peace And Justice!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Fairmont City Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Fairmont City

Areas of Practice in Fairmont City

Cycling Mishaps

Expert in legal representation for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Scald Burns

Extending adept legal assistance for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Physician Incompetence

Providing dedicated legal assistance for patients affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Commodities Obligation

Addressing cases involving defective products, offering adept legal assistance to customers affected by defective items.

Elder Malpractice

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip & Stumble Injuries

Professional in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to victims seeking redress for their injuries.

Newborn Wounds

Delivering legal aid for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Accidents

Crashes: Devoted to guiding victims of car accidents receive just settlement for wounds and harm.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Specializing in providing legal support for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Trucking Accident

Providing adept legal representation for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for hurts.

Building Mishaps

Engaged in assisting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Neurological Traumas

Focused on offering professional legal representation for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Damages

Expertise in managing cases for persons who have suffered harms from puppy bites or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Committed to legal assistance for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Unfair Death

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and experienced legal services to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Injury

Dedicated to representing persons with backbone trauma, offering professional legal assistance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440